23.12.2012 Views

Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council

Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council

Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

can be avoided, remedied or<br />

mitigated.<br />

(c) The extent of modification to the<br />

features of importance as identified<br />

for the individual heritage item.<br />

(d) The importance (if any) of the<br />

setting surrounding the heritage<br />

feature.<br />

(e) The impact the proposal has on<br />

the integrity/value of the heritage<br />

item.<br />

(f) The importance attributed to the<br />

heritage item by the wider<br />

community.<br />

(g) Information, advice or opinion<br />

contained in the Heritage Report,<br />

provided with the environmental<br />

assessment of effects including the<br />

policies and requirements of any<br />

specific conservation plan and the<br />

heritage inventory relating to the<br />

heritage item.<br />

(h) The significance of the place to<br />

tangata whenua as advised in a<br />

cultural impact assessment.<br />

21.1.22.8 Demolition (includes partial<br />

demolition)<br />

(a) The extent to which there has<br />

been a change in circumstances that<br />

has resulted in a reduction of the<br />

historical significance of the building<br />

or feature since the building was<br />

evaluated and listed.<br />

(b) The reasons why the heritage<br />

item is proposed to be demolished.<br />

(c) The extent to which the building<br />

can be economically adapted for<br />

X<br />

Associates Ltd recommend that<br />

the building be recorded in<br />

order to mitigate any potential<br />

adverse effects from removing<br />

it from the site.<br />

(c) N/A- the building is proposed<br />

to be removed/demolished.<br />

(d) The site is located in the<br />

Gerenal Zone (ODP) and<br />

Character Precinct (PDP). The<br />

rest of the site is not<br />

maintained/planted in garden.<br />

(e) The proposal is to remove the<br />

heritage item from the site.<br />

(f) The community has expressed<br />

sentimental value to the<br />

history of the site and building.<br />

(g) The Archaeological Assessment<br />

submitted with the application<br />

concluded that although the<br />

building has historical<br />

associations, the archaeological<br />

potential of the building has<br />

been severely compromised by<br />

the condition of the building.<br />

(h) lwi has confirmed that they do<br />

not have any concerns with the<br />

proposal.<br />

(a) The building is listed in<br />

Proposed <strong>District</strong> Plan based<br />

on the local, district and<br />

regional history associated with<br />

the building.<br />

(b) Major modifications to the<br />

building over the years have<br />

erased the original<br />

architectural features.<br />

(c) Based on investigations<br />

undertaken to determine what<br />

original features have remain<br />

237

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!