SIP JT Williams MS 2010-11 - Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Strategies for Content Area Literacy School Culture • Dale Lamb presentations • Second Step Training All instructional staff Administrators All instructional staff Administrators Strategic Plan 2014-Effective Teachers and Leadership SIP Goal 1 (page ___) * Title I 2009-10 plan * SIP – High Academic Achievement/Effective Educators * Restructuring Plan * Leadership for Turn Around Middle Schools Plan Title I $3,500 October, 2010- June 2010 Title I August 2010- June 2020 Administrative Team Administrative Team • Results-informal/formal observations • Lesson Plans • Reading and Math EOG • AYP Results • Results-informal/formal observations • Lesson Plans • Reading and Math EOG • N.C. Teacher Working Conditions • CM S Teacher Survey • Student Survey • Parent Survey 32
Subject/ Measure # In Membership # Tested Appendix F 2009-2010 NC ABC's PRELIMINARY Summary Results J. T. Williams Middle School % Tested # In Performance Composite # Proficient % Proficient # In Growth Composite # Students Making Growth Growth Sum Average Growth Growth Status High Growth Ratio Grade 6-EOG Math 162 162 100 162 96 59.3 119 99 49.88651 0.41921 MET 4.95 MET Grade 6-EOG Reading High Growth Status 162 162 100 162 62 38.3 115 66 8.15422 0.07091 MET 1.34694 NOT MET Grade 7-EOG Math 180 179 99.4 179 80 44.7 142 66 0.48385 0.00341 MET 0.86842 NOT MET Grade 7-EOG Reading 180 179 99.4 179 47 26.3 139 68 -0.26937 - 0.00194 NOT MET 0.95775 NOT MET Grade 8-EOG Math 171 171 100 171 106 62 127 100 45.89223 0.36136 MET 3.7037 MET Grade 8-EOG Reading Grade 8-EOG Science School Total-EOG Math School Total-EOG Reading School Total-EOG Science School Total-EOC Algebra I School Total-EOG Total School Total-EOC Total School Total-School Composite 171 171 100 171 68 39.8 127 80 18.31495 0.14421 MET 1.70213 MET 171 171 100 171 56 32.7 513 512 99.8 512 282 55.1 388 265 96.26258 0.2481 MET 2.15447 MET 513 512 99.8 512 177 34.6 381 214 26.19981 0.06877 MET 1.28144 NOT MET 171 171 100 171 56 32.7 12 12 100 12 12 100 11 4 -1.22433 -0.1113 NOT MET 0.57143 NOT MET 1197 1195 99.8 1195 515 43.1 769 479 122.46239 0.15925 MET 1.65172 MET 12 12 100 12 12 100 11 4 -1.22433 -0.1113 NOT MET 0.57143 NOT MET 1209 1207 99.8 1207 527 43.7 780 483 121.23806 0.15543 MET 1.62626 MET 33
Page 1 and 2: 2010-2011 CMS SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PL
Page 3 and 4: VISION To empower students with the
Page 5 and 6: John Taylor Williams Middle School
Page 7 and 8: 1. How effective is your school in
Page 9 and 10: We will use Extended Day funds (app
Page 11 and 12: student lexile levels; all teachers
Page 13 and 14: Technology, small class size and co
Page 15 and 16: communication from the school to pa
Page 17 and 18: CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
Page 19 and 20: 5. Implement school-wide content-ar
Page 21 and 22: CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
Page 23 and 24: interim assessments every three to
Page 25 and 26: 2. Increase student leadership oppo
Page 27 and 28: Appendix A JOHN TAYLOR WILLIAMS MID
Page 29 and 30: Appendix C John Taylor Williams Mid
Page 31: TITLE I: HIGH QUALITY & ONGOING PRO
Page 35 and 36: Appendix H John Taylor Williams Mid
Page 37 and 38: Appendix J: Strategies to Attract H
Page 39 and 40: Appendix M - FFA Summer Assessment
Page 41 and 42: of goals/objectives. Reteaching and
Page 43 and 44: DIMENSION B: Student Support Framew
Page 45 and 46: • Before-and after-school tutorin
Page 47: Sub Plan Statement: The SLO (Studen

SIP JT Williams MS 2010-11 - Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?