24.12.2012 Views

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8: Banach <strong>Spaces</strong> 97<br />

� � Tx� ≤ �T��x�. Therefore � � T� ≤ �T�. But since � T is an extension of T we have<br />

that<br />

� � T� = sup{� � Tx� : x ∈ X, �x� ≤ 1}<br />

≤ sup{� � Tx� : x ∈ D(T), �x� ≤ 1}<br />

= sup{�Tx� : x ∈ X, �x� ≤ 1}<br />

= �T�.<br />

The equality � � T� = �T� follows.<br />

The uniqueness is immediate; if S is also a bounded linear extension of T to<br />

the whole of X, then S − � T is a bounded (equivalently, continuous) map on X<br />

which vanishes on the dense subset D(T). Thus S − � T must vanish on the whole<br />

of X, i.e., S = � T.<br />

Remark 8.17 This process of extending a densely-defined bounded linear operator<br />

to one on the whole of X is often referred to as ‘extension by continuity’. If T is<br />

densely-defined, as above, but is not bounded on D(T), there is no ‘obvious’ way<br />

of extending T to the whole of X. Indeed, such a goal may not even be desirable,<br />

as we will see later—for example, the Hellinger-Toeplitz theorem.<br />

We can use the concept of Hamel basis to give an example of a space which is<br />

a Banach space with respect to two inequivalent norms. It is not difficult to give<br />

examples of linear spaces with inequivalent norms. For example, C[0,1] equipped<br />

with the �·� ∞ and � ·� 1 norms is such an example. It is a little harder to find<br />

examples where the space is complete with respect to each of the two inequivalent<br />

norms.<br />

Example 8.18 Let X = ℓ1 and Y = ℓ2 and, for k ∈ N, let ek be the element<br />

ek = (δkm ) m∈N in ℓ1 and let fk denote the corresponding element in ℓ2 . For any t<br />

with 0 < t < 1, let bt = (t,t2 ,t3 ,...). Then {ek : k ∈ N}∪{b t : 0 < t < 1} form<br />

an independent set in ℓ1 , and {fk : k ∈ N}∪{b t : 0 < t < 1} form an independent<br />

set in ℓ2 . These sets can be extended to Hamel bases B1 and B2 of ℓ1 and ℓ2 ,<br />

respectively. Both B1 and B2 contain a subset of cardinality 2ℵ0 . On the other<br />

hand, X ⊆ CN and Y ⊆ CN so we deduce that B1 and B2 both have cardinality<br />

equal to 2ℵ0 . In particular, there is an isomorphism ϕ from B1 onto B2 which<br />

sends ek into fk , for each k ∈ N. By linearity, ϕ defines a linear isomorphism from<br />

ℓ1 onto ℓ2 .<br />

For n ∈ N, let an = �n k=1 1<br />

nek ∈ ℓ1 and let bn = �n k=1 1<br />

nfk ∈ ℓ2 . Then<br />

�an�1 = 1, for all n ∈ N, whereas �bn�2 = 1/ √ n.<br />

We define a new norm |· | on ℓ1 by setting<br />

|x| = �ϕ(x)� 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!