Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces
Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces
Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4: Separation 33<br />
We claim that U and V are disjoint. Indeed, if x ∈ U ∩V, then x ∈ U a ∩V b for<br />
some a ∈ A and b ∈ B. This means that d(x,a) < 1<br />
2 ε a<br />
d(a,b) ≤ d(x,a)+d(x,b)<br />
< 1<br />
2 (ε a +ε b )<br />
≤ max{ε a ,ε b }<br />
and d(x,b) < 1<br />
2 ε b<br />
which is a contradiction. We conclude that U ∩V = ∅, as required.<br />
. Hence<br />
We can give an alternative proof using the continuity of the distance between<br />
a point and a set in a metric space. We recall that if x is any point in a metric<br />
space (X,d) and A is any non-empty subset of X, the distance between x and A<br />
is given by<br />
dist(x,A) = inf{d(x,a) : a ∈ A}.<br />
One shows that x ↦→ dist(x,A) is a continuous mapping from X into R and that<br />
x ∈ A if and only if dist(x,A) = 0. Now suppose that A and B are disjoint<br />
closed non-empty sets in X. Put U = {x ∈ X : dist(x,B)−dist(x,A) > 0} and<br />
V = {x ∈ X : dist(x,B)−dist(x,A) < 0}. Then U is the inverse image of the<br />
open set {t ∈ R : t > 0} under the continuous map x ↦→ dist(x,B) − dist(x,A)<br />
and so is open in X. Similarly, V is open, being the inverse image of the open set<br />
{t ∈ R : t < 0} under the same continuous map. It is clear that U ∩V = ∅. Now,<br />
if a ∈ A, then dist(a,A) = 0. If dist(a,B) were 0, we would conclude that a ∈ B.<br />
But B is closed so that B = B and we know that a /∈ B. Hence dist(a,B) > 0<br />
and so a ∈ U. Thus A ⊆ U. Similarly, B ⊆ V and the result follows.<br />
Theorem 4.4 Every compact Hausdorff space is normal.<br />
Proof Suppose that (X,T) is a compact Hausdorff topological space. We shall<br />
first show that if z ∈ X and F is a closed set not containing z, then z and F have<br />
disjoint neighbourhoods.<br />
For any x ∈ F, there are disjoint open sets U x and V x such that z ∈ U x and<br />
x ∈ V x (by the Hausdorff property). The sets {V x : x ∈ F} form an open cover of<br />
F. Now, F is a closed set in a compact space and so is compact. Hence there is<br />
a finite set J in F such that F ⊆ �<br />
x∈J V x<br />
. Put U = �<br />
x∈J U x<br />
and V = �<br />
x∈J V x .<br />
Then U and V are both open, z ∈ U, F ⊆ V and for any x ∈ J, U ⊆ U x so that<br />
U ∩V x = ∅. Hence U ∩V = ∅.<br />
Now let A and B be any pair of disjoint non-empty closed sets in X. For each<br />
a ∈ A there are disjoint open sets U a and V a such that a ∈ U a and B ⊆ V a , by the<br />
above argument. The sets {U a : a ∈ A} form an open cover of the compact set A<br />
and so there is a finite set S in A such that A ⊆ �<br />
a∈S U a<br />
V = �<br />
a∈S V a<br />
. Put U = �<br />
a∈S U a and<br />
. Then U and V are both open and A ⊆ U and B ⊆ V. Furthermore,<br />
U a ∩V ⊆ U a ∩V a = ∅ and so U and V are disjoint and the proof is complete.