Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces
Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces
Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Set δ = min{δ1 ,...,δ n }. Then, for any x ′ i ∈ Ui , 1 ≤ i ≤ n,<br />
t 1 x ′ 1 +···+t n x′ n ∈ s 1 x 1 +V +···+s n x n +V<br />
6: <strong>Topological</strong> <strong>Vector</strong> <strong>Spaces</strong> 57<br />
⊆ s 1 x 1 +···+s n x n +(−z +W)<br />
= W<br />
whenever |t i −s i | < δ and the result follows.<br />
Next, we shall show that the continuity of the linear operations implies that<br />
the space is Hausdorff provided every point is closed.<br />
Proposition 6.10 A topological vector space (X,T) is separated if and only if<br />
every one-point set is closed.<br />
Proof Of course, if T is a Hausdorff topology, then all one-point sets are closed.<br />
For the converse, let x and y be distinct points in a topological vector space X,<br />
and let w = x−y, so that w �= 0. Now, if {w} is closed, X \{w} is open. Indeed,<br />
X \{w} is an open neighbourhood of 0. The continuity of addition (at 0) implies<br />
that there are neighbourhoods U and V of 0 such that<br />
U +V ⊆ X \{w}.<br />
Since V is a neighbourhood of 0, so is −V (because the scalar multiplication M −1<br />
is a homeomorphism) and therefore w −V is a neighbourhood of w (because the<br />
translation T w is a homeomorphism). Any z ∈ w−V has the form z = w−v with<br />
v ∈ V, and so w = z +v. Since w /∈ U +V, we must have that z /∈ U. Therefore<br />
U ∩(w −V) = ∅, and so, translating by y, (y +U)∩(y +w−V) = ∅, that is,<br />
(y +U)∩(x−V) = ∅. Hence x−V and y +U are disjoint neighbourhoods of x<br />
and y, respectively, and X is Hausdorff.<br />
Definition 6.11 A subset A in a vector space X is said to be absorbing if for any<br />
x ∈ X there is µ > 0 such that x ∈ tA whenever |t| > µ, t ∈ K. Setting x = 0, it<br />
follows that any absorbing set must contain 0. An equivalent requirement for A<br />
to be absorbing is that for any x ∈ X there is some λ > 0 such that sx ∈ A for all<br />
s ∈ K with |s| < λ.<br />
Example 6.12 It is easy to see that a finite intersection of absorbing sets is absorbing.<br />
However, it may happen that an infinite intersection of absorbing sets fails to<br />
be absorbing. For example, let X be the linear space ℓ∞ of all bounded complex<br />
sequences. For each m ∈ N, let Am be the subset consisting of those (an ) in ℓ∞ such that |am | < 1<br />
m . It is clear that each Am is absorbing but their intersection<br />
�<br />
m A m , however, is not. Indeed, if x = (x n ) is the sequence with x n<br />
n ∈ N, then sx is not in �<br />
m A m<br />
for any s �= 0.<br />
= 1 for each