24.12.2012 Views

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Set δ = min{δ1 ,...,δ n }. Then, for any x ′ i ∈ Ui , 1 ≤ i ≤ n,<br />

t 1 x ′ 1 +···+t n x′ n ∈ s 1 x 1 +V +···+s n x n +V<br />

6: <strong>Topological</strong> <strong>Vector</strong> <strong>Spaces</strong> 57<br />

⊆ s 1 x 1 +···+s n x n +(−z +W)<br />

= W<br />

whenever |t i −s i | < δ and the result follows.<br />

Next, we shall show that the continuity of the linear operations implies that<br />

the space is Hausdorff provided every point is closed.<br />

Proposition 6.10 A topological vector space (X,T) is separated if and only if<br />

every one-point set is closed.<br />

Proof Of course, if T is a Hausdorff topology, then all one-point sets are closed.<br />

For the converse, let x and y be distinct points in a topological vector space X,<br />

and let w = x−y, so that w �= 0. Now, if {w} is closed, X \{w} is open. Indeed,<br />

X \{w} is an open neighbourhood of 0. The continuity of addition (at 0) implies<br />

that there are neighbourhoods U and V of 0 such that<br />

U +V ⊆ X \{w}.<br />

Since V is a neighbourhood of 0, so is −V (because the scalar multiplication M −1<br />

is a homeomorphism) and therefore w −V is a neighbourhood of w (because the<br />

translation T w is a homeomorphism). Any z ∈ w−V has the form z = w−v with<br />

v ∈ V, and so w = z +v. Since w /∈ U +V, we must have that z /∈ U. Therefore<br />

U ∩(w −V) = ∅, and so, translating by y, (y +U)∩(y +w−V) = ∅, that is,<br />

(y +U)∩(x−V) = ∅. Hence x−V and y +U are disjoint neighbourhoods of x<br />

and y, respectively, and X is Hausdorff.<br />

Definition 6.11 A subset A in a vector space X is said to be absorbing if for any<br />

x ∈ X there is µ > 0 such that x ∈ tA whenever |t| > µ, t ∈ K. Setting x = 0, it<br />

follows that any absorbing set must contain 0. An equivalent requirement for A<br />

to be absorbing is that for any x ∈ X there is some λ > 0 such that sx ∈ A for all<br />

s ∈ K with |s| < λ.<br />

Example 6.12 It is easy to see that a finite intersection of absorbing sets is absorbing.<br />

However, it may happen that an infinite intersection of absorbing sets fails to<br />

be absorbing. For example, let X be the linear space ℓ∞ of all bounded complex<br />

sequences. For each m ∈ N, let Am be the subset consisting of those (an ) in ℓ∞ such that |am | < 1<br />

m . It is clear that each Am is absorbing but their intersection<br />

�<br />

m A m , however, is not. Indeed, if x = (x n ) is the sequence with x n<br />

n ∈ N, then sx is not in �<br />

m A m<br />

for any s �= 0.<br />

= 1 for each

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!