Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces
Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces
Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
9: The Dual Space of a Normed Space 105<br />
Remark 9.11 Exactly as above, we see that the map z ↦→ ψ z is a linear isometric<br />
mapping of ℓ 1 into the dual of ℓ ∞ . Furthermore, if λ is any element of the dual<br />
of ℓ ∞ , then, in particular, it defines a bounded linear functional on c 0 . Thus,<br />
the restriction of λ to c 0 is of the form ψ z for some z ∈ ℓ 1 . It does not follow,<br />
however, that λ has this form on the whole of ℓ ∞ . Indeed, c 0 is a closed linear<br />
subspace of ℓ ∞ , and, for example, the element y = (y n ), where y n = 1 for all<br />
n ∈ N, is an element of ℓ ∞ which is not an element of c 0 . Then we know, from<br />
the Hahn-Banach theorem, that there is a bounded linear functional λ, say, such<br />
that λ(x) = 0 for all x ∈ c 0 and such that λ(y) = 1. Thus, λ is an element of the<br />
dual of ℓ ∞ which is clearly not determined by an element of ℓ 1 according to the<br />
above correspondence.<br />
Theorem 9.12 Suppose that X is a Banach space and that X ∗ is separable.<br />
Then X is separable.<br />
Proof Let {λ n : n = 1,2,...} be a countable dense subset of X ∗ . For each n ∈ N,<br />
let x n ∈ X be such that �x n � = 1 and |λ n (x n )| ≥ 1<br />
2 �λ n<br />
�. Let S be the set of finite<br />
linear combinations of the x n ’s with rational (real or complex, as appropriate)<br />
coefficients. Then S is countable. We claim that S is dense in X. To see this,<br />
suppose the contrary, that is, suppose that S is a proper closed linear subspace<br />
of X. (Clearly S is a closed subspace.) By Corollary 7.30, there exists a non-zero<br />
bounded linear functional Λ ∈ X∗ such that Λ vanishes on S. Since Λ ∈ X∗ and<br />
{λn : n ∈ N} is dense in X∗ , there is some subsequence (λnk ) such that λ → Λ nk<br />
as k → ∞, that is,<br />
as n → ∞. However,<br />
�Λ−λ � → 0 nk<br />
�Λ−λ nk� ≥ |(Λ−λ nk )(xnk )|, since �x � = 1, nk<br />
= |λnk (x )|, since Λ vanishes on S,<br />
nk<br />
≥ 1<br />
2 �λ nk �<br />
and so it follows that �λ nk � → 0, as k → ∞. But λ nk → Λ implies that �λ nk � →<br />
�Λ� and therefore �Λ� = 0. This forces Λ = 0, which is a contradiction. We<br />
conclude that S is dense in X and that, consequently, X is separable.