24.12.2012 Views

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9: The Dual Space of a Normed Space 105<br />

Remark 9.11 Exactly as above, we see that the map z ↦→ ψ z is a linear isometric<br />

mapping of ℓ 1 into the dual of ℓ ∞ . Furthermore, if λ is any element of the dual<br />

of ℓ ∞ , then, in particular, it defines a bounded linear functional on c 0 . Thus,<br />

the restriction of λ to c 0 is of the form ψ z for some z ∈ ℓ 1 . It does not follow,<br />

however, that λ has this form on the whole of ℓ ∞ . Indeed, c 0 is a closed linear<br />

subspace of ℓ ∞ , and, for example, the element y = (y n ), where y n = 1 for all<br />

n ∈ N, is an element of ℓ ∞ which is not an element of c 0 . Then we know, from<br />

the Hahn-Banach theorem, that there is a bounded linear functional λ, say, such<br />

that λ(x) = 0 for all x ∈ c 0 and such that λ(y) = 1. Thus, λ is an element of the<br />

dual of ℓ ∞ which is clearly not determined by an element of ℓ 1 according to the<br />

above correspondence.<br />

Theorem 9.12 Suppose that X is a Banach space and that X ∗ is separable.<br />

Then X is separable.<br />

Proof Let {λ n : n = 1,2,...} be a countable dense subset of X ∗ . For each n ∈ N,<br />

let x n ∈ X be such that �x n � = 1 and |λ n (x n )| ≥ 1<br />

2 �λ n<br />

�. Let S be the set of finite<br />

linear combinations of the x n ’s with rational (real or complex, as appropriate)<br />

coefficients. Then S is countable. We claim that S is dense in X. To see this,<br />

suppose the contrary, that is, suppose that S is a proper closed linear subspace<br />

of X. (Clearly S is a closed subspace.) By Corollary 7.30, there exists a non-zero<br />

bounded linear functional Λ ∈ X∗ such that Λ vanishes on S. Since Λ ∈ X∗ and<br />

{λn : n ∈ N} is dense in X∗ , there is some subsequence (λnk ) such that λ → Λ nk<br />

as k → ∞, that is,<br />

as n → ∞. However,<br />

�Λ−λ � → 0 nk<br />

�Λ−λ nk� ≥ |(Λ−λ nk )(xnk )|, since �x � = 1, nk<br />

= |λnk (x )|, since Λ vanishes on S,<br />

nk<br />

≥ 1<br />

2 �λ nk �<br />

and so it follows that �λ nk � → 0, as k → ∞. But λ nk → Λ implies that �λ nk � →<br />

�Λ� and therefore �Λ� = 0. This forces Λ = 0, which is a contradiction. We<br />

conclude that S is dense in X and that, consequently, X is separable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!