24.12.2012 Views

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

106 <strong>Basic</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

Theorem 9.13 For 1 ≤ p < ∞ the space ℓ p is separable, but the space ℓ ∞ is<br />

non-separable.<br />

Proof Let S denote the set of sequences of complex numbers (z n ) such that (z n ) is<br />

eventually zero (i.e., z n = 0 for all sufficiently large n, depending on the sequence)<br />

and such that z n has rational real and imaginary parts, for all n. Then S is a<br />

countable set and it is straightforward to verify that S is dense in each ℓ p , for<br />

1 ≤ p < ∞.<br />

Note that S is also a subset of ℓ ∞ , but it is not a dense subset. Indeed, if x<br />

denotes that element of ℓ ∞ all of whose terms are equal to 1, then �x−ζ� ∞ ≥ 1<br />

for any ζ ∈ S.<br />

To show that ℓ ∞ is not separable, consider the subset A of elements whose<br />

components consist of the numbers 0,1,...,9. Then A is uncountable and the<br />

distance between any two distinct elements of A is at least 1. It follows that the<br />

balls {{x : �x−a� ∞ < 1/2} : a ∈ A} are pairwise disjoint. Now, if B is any dense<br />

subset of ℓ ∞ , each ball will contain an element of B, and these will all be distinct.<br />

It follows that B must be uncountable.<br />

Remark 9.14 The example of ℓ 1 shows that a separable Banach space need not<br />

have a separable dual—we have seen that the dual of ℓ 1 is ℓ ∞ , which is not<br />

separable. This also shows that ℓ 1 is not reflexive. Indeed, this would require<br />

that ℓ 1 be isometrically isomorphic to the dual of ℓ ∞ . Since ℓ 1 is separable, an<br />

application of the earlier theorem would lead to the false conclusion that ℓ ∞ is<br />

separable.<br />

Suppose that X is a normed space with dual space X ∗ . Then, in particular,<br />

these are both topological spaces with respect to the topologies induced by their<br />

norms. We wish to consider topologies different from these norm topologies.<br />

Definition 9.15 The σ(X,X ∗ )-topology on a normed space X is called the weak<br />

topology on X.<br />

Thus, the weak topology is the weakest topology with respect to which all<br />

bounded linear functionals are continuous. This topology is a locally convex<br />

topology determined by the family of seminorms P = {|ℓ| : ℓ ∈ X ∗ }. Since<br />

X ∗ separates points of X, a normed space X is a separated topological vector<br />

space when equipped with the weak topology. A net (x ν ) in X converges to x<br />

with respect to the weak topology if and only if ℓ(x ν ) → ℓ(x) for each ℓ ∈ X ∗ .<br />

Since X ∗ is a linear space, it follows immediately from Corollary 7.9, that any<br />

linear functional on X is continuous with respect to the weak topology on X if and<br />

only if it is a member of X ∗ , i.e., X ∗ is precisely the set of all weakly continuous<br />

linear forms on X. Put another way, this says that every weakly continuous linear<br />

Department of Mathematics King’s College, London

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!