Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces
Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces
Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
60 <strong>Basic</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong><br />
Corollary 6.20 Suppose that X and Y are normed spaces and T : X → Y is a<br />
linear map. The following statements are equivalent.<br />
(i) T is continuous at 0.<br />
(ii) T is continuous.<br />
(iii) There is C > 0 such that �Tx� ≤ C�x�, for all x ∈ X.<br />
Proof By the proposition, (i) and (ii) are equivalent, and certainly (iii) implies<br />
(i). We shall show that (i) implies (iii). Let V be the neighbourhood of 0 in Y<br />
given by V = {y ∈ Y : �y� ≤ 1}. The continuity of T at 0 implies that there is a<br />
neighbourhood U of 0 in X such that T(U) ⊆ V. But U contains a ball of radius<br />
r, for some r > 0, so that �x� < r implies that Tx ∈ V, that is, �Tx� ≤ 1. Hence,<br />
for any x ∈ X, with x �= 0, we have that �T(rx/2�x�)� ≤ 1. It follows that<br />
�Tx� ≤ 2<br />
�x� x ∈ X, x �= 0,<br />
r<br />
and this inequality persists for x = 0.<br />
Theorem 6.21 Suppose that Λ is a linear functional on a topological vector<br />
space X, and suppose that Λ(x) �= 0 for some x ∈ X. The following statements<br />
are equivalent.<br />
(i) Λ is continuous.<br />
(ii) kerΛ is closed.<br />
(iii) Λ is bounded on some neighbourhood of 0.<br />
Proof Since kerΛ = Λ −1 ({0}) and {0} is closed in K, it is clear that (i) implies<br />
(ii).<br />
Suppose that kerΛ is closed. By hypothesis, kerΛ �= X, so the complement<br />
of kerΛ is a non-empty open set in X. Hence there is a point x /∈ kerΛ and<br />
V = X\kerΛ is a (open) neighbourhood of x. Let U = V −x. Then U is an open<br />
neighbourhood of 0 and so contains a balanced neighbourhood W, say, of 0. Thus<br />
x+W ⊆ V and so (x+W)∩kerΛ = ∅. The linearity of Λ implies that the set<br />
Λ(W) is a balanced subset of K and so is either bounded or equal to the whole<br />
of K. If Λ(W) = K, there is some w ∈ W such that Λ(w) = −Λ(x). This gives<br />
Λ(x + w) = 0, which is impossible since x + W contains no points of the kernel<br />
of Λ. It follows that Λ(W) is bounded, that is, there is some K > 0 such that<br />
|Λ(w)| < K for all w ∈ W. Hence (ii) implies (iii).<br />
If (iii) holds, there is some neighbourhood V of 0 and some K > 0 such that<br />
V is a neighbourhood<br />
K V we have ε x ∈ V so that |Λ(K ε x)| < K, that is, |Λ(x)| <<br />
|Λ(v)| < K for all v ∈ V. Let ε > 0 be given. Then ε<br />
K<br />
of 0, and if x ∈ ε<br />
K<br />
ε. It follows that Λ is continuous at 0, and hence Λ is continuous on X, by<br />
Proposition 6.19.<br />
Department of Mathematics King’s College, London