24.12.2012 Views

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60 <strong>Basic</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

Corollary 6.20 Suppose that X and Y are normed spaces and T : X → Y is a<br />

linear map. The following statements are equivalent.<br />

(i) T is continuous at 0.<br />

(ii) T is continuous.<br />

(iii) There is C > 0 such that �Tx� ≤ C�x�, for all x ∈ X.<br />

Proof By the proposition, (i) and (ii) are equivalent, and certainly (iii) implies<br />

(i). We shall show that (i) implies (iii). Let V be the neighbourhood of 0 in Y<br />

given by V = {y ∈ Y : �y� ≤ 1}. The continuity of T at 0 implies that there is a<br />

neighbourhood U of 0 in X such that T(U) ⊆ V. But U contains a ball of radius<br />

r, for some r > 0, so that �x� < r implies that Tx ∈ V, that is, �Tx� ≤ 1. Hence,<br />

for any x ∈ X, with x �= 0, we have that �T(rx/2�x�)� ≤ 1. It follows that<br />

�Tx� ≤ 2<br />

�x� x ∈ X, x �= 0,<br />

r<br />

and this inequality persists for x = 0.<br />

Theorem 6.21 Suppose that Λ is a linear functional on a topological vector<br />

space X, and suppose that Λ(x) �= 0 for some x ∈ X. The following statements<br />

are equivalent.<br />

(i) Λ is continuous.<br />

(ii) kerΛ is closed.<br />

(iii) Λ is bounded on some neighbourhood of 0.<br />

Proof Since kerΛ = Λ −1 ({0}) and {0} is closed in K, it is clear that (i) implies<br />

(ii).<br />

Suppose that kerΛ is closed. By hypothesis, kerΛ �= X, so the complement<br />

of kerΛ is a non-empty open set in X. Hence there is a point x /∈ kerΛ and<br />

V = X\kerΛ is a (open) neighbourhood of x. Let U = V −x. Then U is an open<br />

neighbourhood of 0 and so contains a balanced neighbourhood W, say, of 0. Thus<br />

x+W ⊆ V and so (x+W)∩kerΛ = ∅. The linearity of Λ implies that the set<br />

Λ(W) is a balanced subset of K and so is either bounded or equal to the whole<br />

of K. If Λ(W) = K, there is some w ∈ W such that Λ(w) = −Λ(x). This gives<br />

Λ(x + w) = 0, which is impossible since x + W contains no points of the kernel<br />

of Λ. It follows that Λ(W) is bounded, that is, there is some K > 0 such that<br />

|Λ(w)| < K for all w ∈ W. Hence (ii) implies (iii).<br />

If (iii) holds, there is some neighbourhood V of 0 and some K > 0 such that<br />

V is a neighbourhood<br />

K V we have ε x ∈ V so that |Λ(K ε x)| < K, that is, |Λ(x)| <<br />

|Λ(v)| < K for all v ∈ V. Let ε > 0 be given. Then ε<br />

K<br />

of 0, and if x ∈ ε<br />

K<br />

ε. It follows that Λ is continuous at 0, and hence Λ is continuous on X, by<br />

Proposition 6.19.<br />

Department of Mathematics King’s College, London

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!