24.12.2012 Views

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9: The Dual Space of a Normed Space 109<br />

Proposition 9.22 The unit ball {ℓ : �ℓ� ≤ 1} in X ∗ is closed in the w ∗ -topology.<br />

Proof Let ℓ ν → ℓ in the w ∗ -topology. Then ℓ ν (x) → ℓ(x), for each x ∈ X. But if<br />

�ℓ ν � ≤ 1 for all ν, it follows that |ℓ ν (x)| ≤ �x� and so |ℓ(x)| ≤ �x� for all x ∈ X.<br />

That is, �ℓ� ≤ 1 and we conclude that the unit ball is closed.<br />

We will use Tychonov’s theorem to show that the unit ball in the dual space of<br />

a normed space is actually compact in the w ∗ -topology. To do this, it is necessary<br />

to consider the unit ball of the dual space in terms of a suitable cartesian product.<br />

By way of a preamble, let us consider the dual space X ∗ of the normed space X<br />

in such terms. Each element ℓ in X ∗ is a (linear) function on X. The collection<br />

of values ℓ(x), as x runs over X, can be thought of as an element of a cartesian<br />

product with components given by the ℓ(x). Specifically, for each x ∈ X, let Y x<br />

be a copy of K, equipped with its usual topology. Let Y = �<br />

x∈X Y x<br />

= �<br />

x∈X K,<br />

equipped with the product topology. To each element ℓ ∈ X ∗ , we associate the<br />

element γℓ ∈ Y given by γℓ (x) = ℓ(x), i.e., the x-coordinate of γℓ is ℓ(x) ∈ K = Yx .<br />

If ℓ1 ,ℓ2 ∈ X∗ , and if γℓ1 = γℓ2 , then γℓ1 and γ have the same coordinates so<br />

ℓ2<br />

that ℓ1 (x) = γℓ1 (x) = γℓ2 (x) = ℓ2 (x) for all x ∈ X. In other words, ℓ1 = ℓ2 , and<br />

so the correspondence ℓ ↦→ γℓ of X∗ → Y is one<strong>–</strong>one. Thus X∗ can be thought of<br />

as a subset of Y = �<br />

x∈X K.<br />

Suppose now that {ℓα } is a net in X∗ such that ℓα → ℓ in X∗ with respect to<br />

the w∗-topology. This is equivalent to the statement that ℓα (x) → ℓ(x) for each<br />

x ∈ X. But then ℓα (x) = px (γℓα ) → ℓ(x) = px (γℓ ) for all x ∈ X, which, in turn,<br />

is equivalent to the statement that γℓα → γℓ with respect to the product topology<br />

on �<br />

x∈X K.<br />

We see, then, that the correspondence ℓ � γℓ respects the convergence of nets<br />

when X∗ is equipped with the w∗-topology and Y with the product topology. It<br />

will not come as a surprise that this also respects compactness.<br />

Consider now X∗ 1 , the unit ball in the dual of the normed space X∗ . For any<br />

x ∈ X and ℓ ∈ X∗ 1 , we have that |ℓ(x)| ≤ �x�. Let Bx denote the ball in K given<br />

by<br />

B x = {t ∈ K : |t| ≤ �x�}.<br />

Thentheaboveremarkisjust theobservationthatℓ(x) ∈ Bx foreveryℓ ∈ X∗ 1 . We<br />

equip B x with its usual metric topology, so that it is compact. Let Y = �<br />

x∈X B x<br />

equipped with the product topology. Then, by Tychonov’s theorem, Theorem 3.8,<br />

Y is compact.<br />

Let ℓ ∈ X ∗ 1 . Then, as above, ℓ determines an element γ ℓ<br />

γ ℓ (x) = p x (γ ℓ ) = ℓ(x) ∈ B x .<br />

The mapping ℓ ↦→ γ ℓ is one<strong>–</strong>one. Let � Y denote the image of X ∗ 1<br />

�Y = {γ ∈ Y : γ = γ ℓ , some ℓ ∈ X ∗ 1 }.<br />

of Y by setting<br />

under this map,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!