Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces
Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces
Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
42 <strong>Basic</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong><br />
Zorn’s lemma can be shown to be equivalent to Hausdorff’s maximality principle<br />
and the axiom of choice. These are the following.<br />
Hausdorff’s maximality principle Any non-empty partially ordered set contains a<br />
maximal chain, i.e., a totally ordered subset maximal with respect to being totally<br />
ordered.<br />
Axiom of Choice Let {Aα : α ∈ J} be a family of (pairwise disjoint) non-empty<br />
sets, indexed by the non-empty set J. Then there is a mapping ϕ : J → �<br />
αAα such that ϕ(α) ∈ Aα for each α ∈ J.<br />
Thus, the axiom says that we can ‘choose’ a family {a α } with a α ∈ A α , for<br />
each α ∈ J, namely, the range of ϕ. (The requirement that the {A α } be pairwise<br />
disjoint is not essential and can easily be removed—by replacing A α by B α =<br />
{(α,a) : a ∈ A α }.) As a consequence, this axiom gives substance to the cartesian<br />
product �<br />
α A α .<br />
We are now in a position to attack the existence problem of a Hamel basis.<br />
Theorem 5.7 Every vector space X (�= {0}) possesses a Hamel basis.<br />
Proof Let S denote the collection of linearly independent subsets of X, partially<br />
ordered by inclusion. Let {Sα : α ∈ J} be a totally ordered subset of S. Put<br />
S = �<br />
αSα . We claim that S is linearly independent. To see this, suppose that<br />
x 1 ,...,x m are distinct elements of S and suppose that<br />
λ 1 x 1 +···+λ m x m = 0<br />
for non-zero λ1 ,...,λ m ∈ K. Then x1 ∈ Sα1 ,...,x m ∈ Sαm for some α1 ,...,α m ∈<br />
J. Since {Sα } is totally ordered, there is some α ′ ∈ J such that Sα1 ⊆ Sα ′, ... ,<br />
Sαm ⊆ Sα ′. Hence x1 ,...,x m ∈ Sα ′. But Sα ′ is linearly independent and so we<br />
must have that λ1 = ··· = λm = 0. We conclude that S is linearly independent,<br />
as claimed.<br />
It follows that S is an upper bound for {Sα } in S. Thus every totally ordered<br />
subset in S has an upper bound and so, by Zorn’s lemma, S possesses a maximal<br />
element, M, say. We claim that M is a Hamel basis.<br />
To see this, let x ∈ X, x �= 0, and suppose that an equality of the form<br />
x = λ 1 u 1 +···+λ k u k<br />
is impossible for any k ∈ N, distinct elements u 1 ,...,u k ∈ M and non-zero<br />
λ 1 ,...,λ k ∈ K. Then, for any distinct u 1 ,...,u k ∈ M, an equality of the form<br />
αx+λ 1 u 1 +···+λ k u k = 0<br />
Department of Mathematics King’s College, London