24.12.2012 Views

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

Basic Analysis – Gently Done Topological Vector Spaces

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

100 <strong>Basic</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

and so �ϕ x � ≤ �x�. However, by the Hahn-Banach theorem, Corollary 5.24, for<br />

any given x ∈ X, x �= 0, there is ℓ ′ ∈ X ∗ such that �ℓ ′ � = 1 and ℓ ′ (x) = �x�. For<br />

this particular ℓ ′ , we then have<br />

|ϕ x (ℓ ′ )| = |ℓ ′ (x)| = �x� = �x��ℓ ′ �.<br />

We conclude that �ϕ x � = �x�, and the proof is complete.<br />

Thus, we may consider X as a subspace of X ∗∗ via the linear isometric embedding<br />

x ↦→ ϕ x . This leads to the following observation that any normed space<br />

has a completion.<br />

Proposition 9.2 Any normed space is linearly isometrically isomorphic to a dense<br />

subspace of a Banach space.<br />

Proof The space X ∗∗ is a Banach space and, as above, X is linearly isometrically<br />

isomorphic to the subspace {ϕ x : x ∈ X}. The closure of this subspace is the<br />

required Banach space.<br />

Definition 9.3 A Banach space X is said to be reflexive if X = X ∗∗ via the above<br />

embedding.<br />

Note that X ∗∗ is a Banach space, so X must be a Banach space if it is to be<br />

reflexive.<br />

Theorem 9.4 A Banach space X is reflexive if and only if X ∗ is reflexive.<br />

Proof If X = X ∗∗ , then X ∗ = X ∗∗∗ via the appropriate embedding. We see this<br />

as follows. To say that X = X ∗∗ means that each element of X ∗∗ has the form ϕ x<br />

for some x ∈ X. Now let ψ ℓ ∈ X ∗∗∗ be the corresponding association of X ∗ into<br />

X ∗∗∗ ,<br />

ψ ℓ (z) = z(ℓ) for ℓ ∈ X ∗ and z ∈ X ∗∗ .<br />

We have X ∗ ⊆ X ∗∗∗ via ℓ ↦→ ψ ℓ . Let λ ∈ X ∗∗∗ . Any z ∈ X ∗∗ has the form ϕ x , for<br />

suitable x ∈ X, and so λ(z) = λ(ϕ x ). Define ℓ : X → K by ℓ(x) = λ(ϕ x ). Then<br />

It follows that ℓ ∈ X ∗ . Moreover,<br />

|ℓ(x)| = |λ(ϕ x )|<br />

≤ �λ��ϕ x �<br />

= ��x�.<br />

ψ ℓ (ϕ x ) = ϕ x (ℓ)<br />

and so ψ ℓ = λ, i.e., X ∗ = X ∗∗∗ via ψ.<br />

= ℓ(x) = λ(ϕ x )<br />

Department of Mathematics King’s College, London

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!