03.03.2023 Views

A.D. 381 heretics, pagans, and the dawn of the monotheistic state ( PDFDrive )

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

be deposed. He presented the small assembly of his bishops as if it represented

‘the western Church’ acting in defence of universal Christianity. The letter was

even addressed to Theodosius as well as to Gratian on the grounds that the

western bishops had a legitimate interest in the vacancy at Antioch, where the

rights of Paulinus should be upheld against those of Flavian. (It is interesting that

Ambrose made no mention of the Council of Constantinople, which had been

held earlier in the year. One must assume that he didn’t want it to be considered

more important than his own - though he certainly knew of it through Acholius

of Thessalonika, who attended the later sessions.) Theodosius’ reply was

dismissive. The eastern and western Churches, divided by geography and

language, and increasingly by separate administrations, were by now drifting

apart. When Bishop Damasus tried to regain the initiative for the west by calling

a council to be held in Rome in 382 to which all eastern bishops were invited,

only three easterners, among them Paulinus, discarded at Antioch, attended.

There is no evidence that Gratian acquiesced in Ambrose’s demand to depose

the two ‘Arian’ bishops. But Ambrose persisted. He was both helped and

hindered by the weakness of the young emperor, who seems to have been

particularly susceptible to the machinations of others when he established his

court permanently in Milan in March 381. Milan’s central location made it a

good base from which to defend the northern borders of the western empire, and

the young Valentinian II and his mother Justina were already settled there.

Ambrose benefited from the possibility of direct access to the court, but it was

clear that a number of important Christian figures arrived from Rome to take

advantage of the shift of power to Milan. One of their successes had been to

secure the removal of the Altar of Victory from the Senate in Rome, which had

always been associated with the success of the Senate’s deliberations. This was

part of a campaign to withdraw state funds for ancient rites and went along with

a refusal by Gratian to take on the traditional imperial title of pontifex maximus,

chief of the priesthood.

The court’s move to Milan was unpopular with those communities that had

prospered from the imperial presence in Trier and Sirmium. There was additional

resentment when Gratian recruited mercenaries from among the Alans, one of

the Germanic tribes. He showed a somewhat un-Roman enthusiasm for their

skill as archers, and his public appearance in an Alan costume might have been

the moment when his credibility was irrevocably lost. Stories of the lack of

control in his court and the proliferation of corruption abounded. Theodosius

paid him less and less respect and in January 383 accorded his own eldest son

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!