03.03.2023 Views

A.D. 381 heretics, pagans, and the dawn of the monotheistic state ( PDFDrive )

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bethlehem. This was an outrageous intrusion on John’s prerogatives and John

retaliated by excommunicating the members of Jerome’s community, forbidding

any contact between them and the diocese’s clergy. Epiphanius returned to

Cyprus, from where he wrote a furious letter to John saying he should have been

only too glad to have had extra clergy found for him and demanding that he

repudiate the heretical views of Origen, which he listed in detail. John, realising

by now that he was dealing with someone who was seriously deranged, wisely

refused to reply. Not to be deterred, Epiphanius sent copies of his letter to all the

Palestinian monasteries, urging them to sever their ties with John. Epiphanius

had now succeeded in creating a state of civil war in John’s diocese.

If Epiphanius lacked any sense of judgement, Jerome proved as bad. His

monastery too had received a copy of Epiphanius’ letter to John, which was

written in Greek. One of Jerome’s guests, Eusebius, from Cremona in Italy,

could not speak the language and Jerome offered to provide him with a Latin

translation, in which he embellished the letter to make it sound even more

offensive than it was. Jerome’s abusive comments littered the margins. In a

farcical turn of events, the translated letter then somehow disappeared from

Eusebius’ desk and found its way back to John and Rufinus, who spotted the

embellishments to the translation. Anxious to protect his own reputation in the

west, where he feared he would now be regarded as a heretic, John let his

supporters in Rome know what Jerome had done. Jerome replied with the weak

argument that translators should always seek out the sense of a work rather than

just make a literal translation, and this was no more than he had done.

It was to his credit that John realised that a compromise had to be found. He

suggested that Theophilus, Bishop of Alexandria, should mediate. The first

attempt was disastrous, because Theophilus sent as his representative one

Isidore, a priest who had already written to John and Rufinus supporting their

stand against Jerome. A leaked copy of the letter had reached Jerome, and he

refused to accept its author as a conciliator. Theophilus persisted. A letter John

sent him showed that the bishop was eager to defuse the issue, and a carefully

worded letter sent by Theophilus to Jerome avoided placing any blame on him.

Just as Christ had been humble and the scriptures had preached brotherly love,

so too Jerome should seek peace with his bishop. Jerome’s reply is another

illustration of his intense social isolation. Grateful for the attention, he submitted

to Theophilus’ request. ‘Let him [John] be as he used to be when he loved me of

his own choice... If he shows himself like that, gladly I hold out my hands and

stretch my arms to him. He will have in me a friend and a kinsman, and will find

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!