03.03.2023 Views

A.D. 381 heretics, pagans, and the dawn of the monotheistic state ( PDFDrive )

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

his ‘betrayal’ would have to be baptised again; the retort was that baptism as a

sacrament was valid in itself irrespective of the cleric who administered the rite.

The dispute became so intractable that it caused a schism in North Africa. The

hardliners, known as the Donatists, followed their charismatic bishop Donatus,

while the rival group elected one Caecilian as their bishop.

At first Constantine appears to have been happy to let the Church deal with

the problem, and he asked the Bishop of Rome, Miltiades, to preside over a

small gathering of bishops, mostly from Italy, to decide the issue. But after

appeals and counter-appeals from both parties - Constantine was always ready to

listen to petitioners, often giving them personal audiences - he gradually, over

three or four years, tended towards the Caecilianists. Donatus’ refusal to

compromise with the imperial authorities led to the isolation of himself and his

followers from state patronage, which was now channelled towards the

Caecilianists. It was a moment of immense symbolic importance, because

Constantine was in fact shaping the form and structure of what became the

Roman Catholic Church. By supporting those bishops who were prepared to

acquiesce in his rule, he created an alliance between Church and state that was to

persist, if often uneasily, in western Europe for centuries to come. The precedent

had now been set that the emperor might intervene not only to strengthen the

Church but to influence doctrine. (There does seem to have been some initial

state persecution of the Donatists, but in 321 Constantine ordered the vicarius of

Africa to relent, and despite their lack of patronage, the Donatists flourished and

became the largest Christian community in Africa.)

These pragmatic moves went hand in hand with Constantine’s rise to

domination over the empire. Licinius had eliminated his rival Maximinus in 313

and became Constantine’s sole rival for power. Over the coming years the

relationship corroded, and the records suggest that Constantine gradually took

more decisions without reference to Licinius. In 323 Constantine crossed into

Licinius’ half of the empire, establishing a cause for war that his rival could not

ignore. In two major battles in 324, one near the city of Adrianople, Licinius was

defeated. Constantine now ruled the entire Roman empire, east and west, and to

celebrate he set in hand a new imperial capital, strategically placed on the site of

ancient Byzantium between Europe and Asia. The ‘new Rome’, Constantinople,

was to be capital first of the eastern empire, and later of the Byzantine empire

until its fall to the Ottoman Turks in 1453.

In the eastern empire Constantine encountered a Christian church that was

much more deeply rooted than anything he had found in the west. While only

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!