03.03.2023 Views

A.D. 381 heretics, pagans, and the dawn of the monotheistic state ( PDFDrive )

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

were reunited with him. Unlike Augustine, who was to teach that man was so

heavily weighted with sin that he could never regain the grace of God through

his own efforts, Origen believed that the soul had powers of reason and free will

that it could harness to move towards God. In this he was drawing on Plato’s

concept of an ascent through reasoned thought to a fuller understanding of the

Forms and ‘the Good’.

Origen believed that Jesus had existed from the beginning of time but that the

Son was distinct from the Father and was used by him to mediate between the

Father and the inferior material world. Thus Jesus was subordinate to the Father,

who placed him within a human body for his mission. The Holy Ghost too was

subordinate and placed by Origen at the head of the created order.

Over a century later, after the parameters of theological debate had been

narrowed by Theodosius’ decree, many Christian thinkers were still prepared to

accept Origen’s greatness and the depth of his theological insights while

ignoring his subordinationism. But in his hunt for heresies, Epiphanius could not

let the legacy of Origen lie intact. In his Panarion he attacked Origen over his

subordinationism, his belief in the pre-existence of souls and his denial of the

resurrection of the body. To Epiphanius, Origen was the arch-heretic who had

inspired Arius.

Epiphanius had been born in Palestine, and in 393, now an old man, he

returned home to extirpate the Origenist heretics he believed flourished there.

His chief target was the worldly and confident Bishop of Jerusalem, John, who

was reputed to have subordinationist sympathies, but he started his campaign by

sending a band of monks to confront two of the most important intellectual

figures of the region. The scholar Jerome lived in a monastery in Bethlehem,

where he practised a rigid asceticism and worked on his Latin translation of the

Bible; Rufinus, less ascetic and more measured in his scholarship, was settled in

a monastery on the Mount of Olives. The two men had been friends since

childhood and both were known for their support of Origen. Jerome’s use of

Origen’s commentaries on the Bible was such that scholars have been able to

reconstruct lost works of Origen from Jerome’s plagiarism. 8 Rufinus was more

of an independent scholar, and had studied the master for six years under

Didymus the Blind, the famous scholar of Alexandria, who also admired Origen.

When Epiphanius’ monks arrived, Rufinus barred the gates of the monastery

to them and told them that they would be driven off with cudgels if they

persisted in trying to enter. The welcome the rebuffed monks received from

Jerome was very different. An isolated and often embittered man, Jerome had

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!