06.01.2013 Views

Section 2 - Sugar Research and Development Corporation

Section 2 - Sugar Research and Development Corporation

Section 2 - Sugar Research and Development Corporation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SRDC fostered the greater use of economic tools<br />

such as gross margin analysis by cane harvesters<br />

<strong>and</strong> growers operators in decision-making with<br />

a focus on profi tability <strong>and</strong> not just productivity.<br />

This aspect until now has been under developed<br />

because key industry organisations generally<br />

did not provide economic advice with extension<br />

programs as it was assumed that high productivity<br />

was best for all sectors of the industry.<br />

SRDC support for extension of economic<br />

information was essential for the rapid adoption<br />

of improved cane farming systems <strong>and</strong> was<br />

achieved in part by funding a wider range of<br />

R&D providers not traditionally used in the sugar<br />

industry. SRDC has long recognised that people<br />

are the key to a prosperous <strong>and</strong> competitive<br />

sugar industry. Traditionally, development of skills<br />

<strong>and</strong> knowledge was through scholarships <strong>and</strong><br />

travel grants but more recently specifi c funding<br />

for grower group R&D projects is returning<br />

greater benefi ts because growers have much<br />

greater ownership of the results <strong>and</strong> are more like<br />

to adopt new <strong>and</strong> improved practices.<br />

Integration of an extension component within<br />

projects is gaining momentum <strong>and</strong> is encouraged<br />

as this speeds adoption. Several extension <strong>and</strong><br />

promotion projects have been funded by SRDC<br />

to identify <strong>and</strong> test new ways of increasing the<br />

rate of adoption of improved technologies <strong>and</strong><br />

best management practices on farm.<br />

IMPACT OF SRDC INVESTMENT ON R&D OUTCOMES<br />

Many projects are providing signifi cant returns<br />

for a relatively small investment – growers are<br />

increasingly taking control of their own R&D<br />

projects <strong>and</strong> working more closely with industry<br />

researchers, rather than relying on other people<br />

to solve on farm issues. Examples of such<br />

successful projects include:<br />

��harvest payment arrangements that provide<br />

incentives for quality product,<br />

��improved harvester design, effi ciency <strong>and</strong><br />

operation,<br />

��harvesting <strong>and</strong> transport of crop to supply<br />

additional fi bre for cogeneration,<br />

��grower-monitoring <strong>and</strong> management of the<br />

quality of water emanating from farms,<br />

��integration of grain legume <strong>and</strong> other cash<br />

crops to improve cane farming systems, <strong>and</strong><br />

��adaption of improved farming systems to suit<br />

local conditions.<br />

SRDC pursues a policy of supporting projects<br />

where economic, environmental <strong>and</strong> social<br />

impacts are all considered when planning <strong>and</strong><br />

evaluating research <strong>and</strong> development projects.<br />

This means that projects are more likely to<br />

provide outcomes that can be readily accessed<br />

<strong>and</strong> adopted by industry people.<br />

SRDC Annual Report 2010–2011 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!