Status of Wisconsin Agriculture 2010 - Agricultural & Applied ...
Status of Wisconsin Agriculture 2010 - Agricultural & Applied ...
Status of Wisconsin Agriculture 2010 - Agricultural & Applied ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Percent<br />
40<br />
36<br />
32<br />
28<br />
24<br />
20<br />
16<br />
12<br />
8<br />
4<br />
0<br />
Changes in Dairy Farm Equity<br />
Related to Financial Stress<br />
USDA’s <strong>Agricultural</strong> Resource Management<br />
Survey estimated total <strong>Wisconsin</strong><br />
dairy farm assets at the end<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2008 at $20.8 billion and total<br />
debt at $3.1 billion, leaving total<br />
equity at $17.7 billion. Equity was<br />
split 1/3-2/3 between dairy farms<br />
with more than $500,000 in sales<br />
and those with less than $500,000 in<br />
sales in 2008.<br />
<strong>Wisconsin</strong> dairy farm balance sheets<br />
weakened in 2009 from the combination<br />
<strong>of</strong> a loss in asset value and an<br />
Income Variables for <strong>Wisconsin</strong> Dairy Farms by Size Class, 2008<br />
Percent <strong>of</strong> Gross<br />
Returns to Assets<br />
(Left Axis)<br />
Percent <strong>of</strong><br />
Interest Expense<br />
(Left Axis<br />
increase in debt. The value <strong>of</strong> assets<br />
fell for three main reasons: (1) the<br />
value <strong>of</strong> dairy cows and heifers<br />
decreased because <strong>of</strong> much lower<br />
milk prices; (2) the value <strong>of</strong> land<br />
and buildings dropped because <strong>of</strong><br />
lower earning value; and (3) dairy<br />
farmers were forced to sell some<br />
assets (e.g., financial assets) to <strong>of</strong>fset<br />
negative cash flow.<br />
We estimated the loss in the value <strong>of</strong><br />
the state’s dairy cow inventory by<br />
subtracting reported USDA-NASS<br />
<strong>Wisconsin</strong> replacement cow prices<br />
in October 2009 ($1,200) from those<br />
Interest Expense as a<br />
Percent <strong>of</strong> Gross Returns<br />
to Assets (Right Axis)<br />
0<br />
$1,000,000 or more $500,000–$999,999 $250,000–$499,999 $100,000–$249,999 Less than $100,000<br />
2008 Sales<br />
Estimated <strong>Wisconsin</strong> Dairy Farm Assets and Debt by Sales Class,<br />
December 31, 2008. $Million<br />
Sales Class Assets Debt Equity<br />
$1,000,000+ 4,227 1,164 3,063<br />
$500,000 - 999,999 3,358 621 2,737<br />
$250,000 - 499,999 5,695 662 5,033<br />
$100,000 - 249,999 5,812 531 5,282<br />
< $100,000 1,741 161 1,580<br />
Total 20,833 3,139 17,695<br />
Source: <strong>Agricultural</strong> Resource Management Survey<br />
in October 2008 ($1,940). This<br />
yielded a $740/cow loss in value,<br />
which we reduced slightly to<br />
account for higher expected replacement<br />
cow prices later in 2009, then<br />
multiplied by the number <strong>of</strong> dairy<br />
cows in the state in November 2009<br />
(1.258 million cows). This gave us<br />
an estimated loss <strong>of</strong> cow value <strong>of</strong><br />
about $850 million.<br />
To estimate the loss in the value <strong>of</strong><br />
heifers, we assumed a ratio <strong>of</strong> 46<br />
heifers per 100 cows, which comes<br />
to about 575,000 heifers on <strong>Wisconsin</strong><br />
dairy farms in 2009. 2 We applied<br />
a loss in heifer value <strong>of</strong> $600 to<br />
derive an estimated total loss <strong>of</strong><br />
about $350 million. Combined with<br />
the estimated loss in cow value, this<br />
STATUS OF WISCONSIN AGRICULTURE <strong>2010</strong>—THE WISCONSIN FARM ECONOMY 5<br />
20<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
Percent<br />
2 USDA reports dairy heifers by state only for<br />
January. The January 2009 <strong>Wisconsin</strong> heifer<br />
count was 650,000. The U.S. heifer/cow ratio<br />
reported for July was 5 heifers per 100 cows<br />
less than the U.S. ratio in January. We<br />
reduced the January <strong>Wisconsin</strong> ratio by the<br />
same amount to derive July heifer numbers.