12.01.2013 Views

STUDENT EVALUATION OF CLINICAL EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT

STUDENT EVALUATION OF CLINICAL EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT

STUDENT EVALUATION OF CLINICAL EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

identification of their completed inventories. Perhaps students were hesitant to provide both<br />

inventory identification information and identification of the clinical site they were evaluating<br />

for fear of loss of anonymity, particularly if there were a limited number of students at the<br />

particular site.<br />

Student lack of specificity in identification of clinical sites also presented a problem for<br />

data analysis and interpretation. Although they were requested to identify the particular clinical<br />

area or department within a facility to which they were assigned, 54 student respondents<br />

identified their clinical learning sites with only a hospital name. This incomplete identification<br />

of clinical sites resulted in the grouping of all inventories identified only with the facility name<br />

into one site group for clinical site comparisons, potentially masking differences between distinct<br />

(but unidentified) clinical sites within the facility. Five of the 25 clinical site groups used in the<br />

comparative analysis included an unknown number of clinical sites within a particular hospital,<br />

potentially impacting the ANOVA results, particularly for LMA and SMW institutions. This<br />

incomplete clinical site identification may also have been a purposeful student act to protect<br />

anonymity. It may be that the request for identification of inventories will need to be removed in<br />

order to prompt students to accurately identify clinical sites. Perhaps in the future, separate<br />

student populations should be used to gather test-retest reliability data and to conduct clinical site<br />

comparisons, eliminating the need to gather student identification data for the site comparisons.<br />

Student identification of their inventories would only be necessary for those students completing<br />

evaluations of the same or different clinical sites over a period of time, for the purpose of<br />

comparison of individual student scores.<br />

Student data from one other demographic item were somewhat disconcerting to the<br />

researcher. In response to the item addressing assignment of a student resource person, the<br />

98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!