12.01.2013 Views

STUDENT EVALUATION OF CLINICAL EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT

STUDENT EVALUATION OF CLINICAL EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT

STUDENT EVALUATION OF CLINICAL EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusion<br />

The applied learning aspect of nursing education is a critical component of the overall<br />

nursing program as the development of competent nursing practitioners depends to a great<br />

degree upon the quality of the clinical learning environment (Jacka & Lewin, 1986). Research<br />

has demonstrated that student perceptions of the learning environment account for an appreciable<br />

variance in student learning outcomes (Fraser, Williamson, & Tobin, 1987). The wide variety of<br />

clinical sites used for applied learning experiences may provide vastly different qualities of<br />

learning environments for nursing students. Thus, assessment of the quality of these sites is<br />

critical. Yet, to date, there has been a lack of a means to comprehensively evaluate the clinical<br />

learning environment and its impact on student learning. Accurate identification of the factors<br />

influencing student learning in the applied (clinical) environment is necessary, in order for<br />

nursing faculty and administrators to be able to assess the current status of these factors within<br />

the clinical settings used by a nursing program, to implement changes to improve the clinical<br />

learning environment, and to evaluate the benefit of changes that are made.<br />

The SECEE inventory provides an efficient means to begin to assess the quality of the<br />

clinical learning environment through the students’ eyes. The instrument is efficient to<br />

administer and analyze. Students in the sample population responded consistently to the<br />

instrument as a whole and to the scales within the inventory. Test-retest reliability was<br />

sufficiently high, given the additional student clinical experiences between initial and repeat<br />

testing. Data also indicated that students responded differently to the instrument when<br />

evaluating two discrete clinical environments.<br />

The SECEE inventory was demonstrated to detect differences between student sub-<br />

populations. Students responded differently to the instrument according to the institution in<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!