STUDENT EVALUATION OF CLINICAL EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 11 ANOVA Statistics, Clinical Site Group by Scale Score df 1 df 2 F ratio p LMA Instit. Comm/ Feedback 10 73 1.21 .30 * Learning Opportunity 10 73 1.00 .46 Learning Support 10 73 1.44 .18 Department Atmosphere 10 73 1.87 .064 SMW Instit. Comm/ Feedback 6 54 3.41 .006 Learning Opportunity 6 54 1.74 .13 Learning Support 6 54 3.46 .006 Department Atmosphere 6 54 4.83 .001 SMA Instit. Comm/ Feedback 11 83 1.44 .17 Learning Opportunity 11 83 1.77 .073 * Learning Support 11 83 1.92 .048 Department Atmosphere 11 83 1.95 .045 * Note: violation of Homogeneity of Variance assumption according to Levene’s Statistic at p < .05 70
Table 12 Scale Score Means and Standard Deviations by Clinical Site Groups LMA 11 n = 11 Site Group Comm. / 12 n = 5 13 n = 6 14 n = 16 17 n = 5 19 n = 5 33 n = 4 39 n = 4 51 n = 9 54 n = 9 Feedback M = 14.45 SD = 3.96 M = 12.40 SD = 1.82 M =17.75 SD = 2.72 M = 16.95 SD = 6.99 M = 19.00 SD = 6.36 M = 12.60 SD = 2.70 M = 16.29 SD = 5.12 M = 14.0 SD = 6.98 M = 15.15 SD = 7.99 M = 12.33 SD = 3.08 Learning Opportunity M = 13.27 SD = 3.35 M = 13.60 SD = 3.51 M = 15.83 SD = 2.48 M = 17.39 SD = 6.25 M = 19.80 SD = 7.19 M = 12.40 SD = 3.44 M = 16.07 SD = 4.66 M = 18.50 SD = 10.47 M = 18.11 SD = 7.93 M = 16.11 SD = 7.52 71 Learning Support M = 15.35 SD = 3.72 M = 12.40 SD = 2.41 M = 20.00 SD = 1.90 M = 18.53 SD = 6.85 M = 19.40 SD = 6.34 M = 16.21 SD = 5.89 M = 14.29 SD = 5.19 M = 13.25 SD = 7.54 M = 17.21 SD = 6.19 M = 14.47 SD = 4.18 Dept. Atmosphere M = 12.00 SD = 3.26 M = 10.92 SD = 2.83 M = 15.00 SD = 1.41 M = 14.72 SD = 4.20 M = 14.20 SD = 4.20 M = 9.40 SD = 0.89 M = 12.25 SD = 0.96 M = 9.25 SD = 3.95 M = 12.98 SD = 4.78 M = 11.89 SD = 4.29
Page 1 and 2:
STUDENT EVALUATION OF CLINICAL EDUC
Page 3 and 4:
significant for any of the four sca
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents List of Tables vi
Page 7 and 8:
Tables List of Tables 1. Identifica
Page 9 and 10:
Student Evaluation of Clinical Educ
Page 11 and 12:
development of different skills and
Page 13 and 14:
Examples of applied learning enviro
Page 15 and 16:
hear about a topic, but must contac
Page 17 and 18:
with others and participation in a
Page 19 and 20:
ideal applied learning environment
Page 21 and 22:
contingencies present in the learni
Page 23 and 24:
that many aspects of the clinical e
Page 25 and 26:
The second instrument-based clinica
Page 27 and 28: Empirical Investigations of the Tra
Page 29 and 30: etween 18 and 31% of variance in sc
Page 31 and 32: .32 for the student actual form and
Page 33 and 34: significantly differentiated betwee
Page 35 and 36: were lower than preferred scores fo
Page 37 and 38: Table 1. Identification and Frequen
Page 39 and 40: Although the above-mentioned learni
Page 41 and 42: The original two-page SECEE instrum
Page 43 and 44: espondents. Analysis of item respon
Page 45 and 46: sites having few respondents. If in
Page 47 and 48: Chapter 3 Methods The following sec
Page 49 and 50: added, based on the applied cogniti
Page 51 and 52: Limiting the number of items while
Page 53 and 54: clinical sites, for the purposes of
Page 55 and 56: Descriptive Analysis Data from the
Page 57 and 58: Study participants responded “can
Page 59 and 60: Table 2 SECEE Inventory Forced-choi
Page 61 and 62: Item 22. Students helped each other
Page 63 and 64: Table 3 Scale Means and Standard De
Page 65 and 66: sites more favorably (M = 11.81) th
Page 67 and 68: Table 6 Reliability Coefficients fo
Page 69 and 70: assists in reducing the confounding
Page 71 and 72: Table 8 ANOVA Results, Student Leve
Page 73 and 74: Table 10 Scale Score Means and Stan
Page 75 and 76: Sophomore SMA students rated the Le
Page 77: Support at site group 5 more positi
Page 81 and 82: SMA 14 n = 7 Site Group Comm. / 17
Page 83 and 84: Analysis of Narrative Inventory Dat
Page 85 and 86: Analysis of the narrative student c
Page 87 and 88: Student comments reflecting scaled
Page 89 and 90: Table 17 Frequencies of Student Res
Page 91 and 92: Table 18 Frequencies of Student Res
Page 93 and 94: Chapter 5 Discussion and Conclusion
Page 95 and 96: their own clients as a hindrance to
Page 97 and 98: the Department Atmosphere scale, an
Page 99 and 100: end of semester perception of the l
Page 101 and 102: minimal grouping of sites was requi
Page 103 and 104: the instrument, the investigator fe
Page 105 and 106: also may have averted a higher inci
Page 107 and 108: number of students reporting that n
Page 109 and 110: 6. Add a fifth response item to the
Page 111 and 112: with individual patients, and are a
Page 113 and 114: separately at each item pertaining
Page 115 and 116: Conclusion The applied learning asp
Page 117 and 118: References American Association of
Page 119 and 120: Fraser, B. J. & O’Brien, P. O. (1
Page 121 and 122: Reilly, D. E. & Oerman, M. H. (1992
Page 123 and 124: Appendix A Original SECEE Instrumen
Page 125 and 126: Key: 1 = very seldom 2 = sometimes
Page 127 and 128: Inventory Scale Item Number Communi
Page 129 and 130:
Appendix C Revised SECEE Instrument
Page 131 and 132:
Key: 1 = Strongly Agree 2 = Agree 3
Page 133 and 134:
Key: 1 = Strongly Agree 2 = Agree 3
Page 135 and 136:
Table of Specifications for Student
Page 137 and 138:
Appendix E 129
Page 139 and 140:
Appendix F 131
Page 141 and 142:
KARI SAND-JECKLIN 2003 White Oak Dr
Page 143 and 144:
Staff Nurse: employed part-time at
show all

STUDENT EVALUATION OF CLINICAL EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?