(CRAM) For Wetlands User's Manual Version 5.0.2

More documents

Recommendations

Info

California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands v. 5.0.2 – Chapter 5 BIOTIC STRUCTURE ATTRIBUTE (WITHIN 50 M OF AA) Mowing, grazing, excessive herbivory (within AA) Excessive human visitation Predation and habitat destruction by non-native vertebrates (e.g., Virginia opossum and domestic predators, such as feral pets) Tree cutting/sapling removal Removal of woody debris Treatment of non-native and nuisance plant species Pesticide application or vector control Biological resource extraction or stocking (fisheries, aquaculture) Excessive organic debris in matrix (for vernal pools) Lack of vegetation management to conserve natural resources Lack of treatment of invasive plants adjacent to AA or buffer Comments BUFFER AND LANDSCAPE CONTEXT ATTRIBUTE (WITHIN 500 M OF AA) Urban residential Industrial/commercial Military training/Air traffic Dams (or other major flow regulation or disruption) Dryland farming Intensive row-crop agriculture Orchards/nurseries Commercial feedlots Dairies Ranching (enclosed livestock grazing or horse paddock or feedlot) Transportation corridor Rangeland (livestock rangeland also managed for native vegetation) Sports fields and urban parklands (golf courses, soccer fields, etc.) Passive recreation (bird-watching, hiking, etc.) Active recreation (off-road vehicles, mountain biking, hunting, fishing) Physical resource extraction (rock, sediment, oil/gas) Biological resource extraction (aquaculture, commercial fisheries) Comments 94 Present and likely to have negative effect on AA Present and likely to have negative effect on AA Significant negative effect on AA Significant negative effect on AA
California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands v. 5.0.2 – References REFERENCES Ambrose, R.F., J.C. Callaway, and S.F. Lee. 2006. An Evaluation of Compensatory Mitigation Projects Permitted Under Clean Water Act Section 401 by the California State Water Quality Control Board, 1991-1992. Prepared for California Environmental Protection Agency and California State Water Resources Control Board, Los Angeles, CA. 414 pp. Amoros, C. and G. Bornette. 2002. Connectivity and Bio-complexity in Water bodies of Riverine Floodplains. Freshwater Biology 47:761-776. Barbour, M.T., J.B. Stribling, and J.R. Karr. 1995. Multimetric approach for establishing and measuring biological condition. In Biological Assessment and Criteria, Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, Eds. Wayne S. Davis and Thomas P. Simon, CRC Press, Inc. Bartoldus, C.C., 1999. A comprehensive review of wetland assessment procedures: a guide for wetland practitioners. Environmental Concern Inc., St. Michaels, MD. Bormann, B.T., P.G. Cunningham, M.H. Brooks, V.W. Manning, and M.W. Collopy. 1994. Adaptive Ecosystem Management in the Pacific Northwest. U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-341. 22 pp. Brinson, M.M. 1993. A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical Report WRP- DE-4. Burglund, J. 1999. Montana Wetland Assessment Method. Montana Department of Transportation and Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Helena, MT. Cal-IPC. 2006. California Invasive Plant Inventory. Cal-IPC Publication 2006-02. California Invasive Plant Council: Berkeley, CA. Available: www.cal-ipc.org. Carletti, A., G.A. De Leo, and I. Ferrari, 2004. A critical review of representative wetland rapid assessment methods in North America, Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 14: S103–S113. CDF. 1998. California Forest Practice Rules. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Sacramento, CA. Collins, J.N. San Francisco Estuary Institute. 1998. Bay Area Watersheds Science Approach. Version 3. The role of watershed science to support environmental planning and resource protection. Oakland, CA. 36 pp. Collins, J.N. and R.M. Grossinger. 2004. Synthesis of scientific knowledge concerning estuarine landscapes and related habitats of the South Bay Ecosystem. Technical report of the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project. San Francisco Estuary Institute, Oakland, CA. Collins, J.N., M. Sutula, E.D. Stein, M. Odaya, E. Zhang, K. Larned. 2006. Comparison of Methods to Map California Riparian Areas. Final Report Prepared for the California Riparian Habitat Joint Venture. 85 pp. Collins, L.M., J.N. Collins, and L.B. Leopold. 1987. Geomorphic processes of an estuarine tidal marsh: preliminary results and hypotheses. In: International Geomorphology 1986 Part I. V. Gardner (ed.). John Wiley and Sons, LTD. Pp. 1049-1072. 95
Page 1 and 2:
California Rapid Assessment Method
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
LIST OF WORKSHEETS Worksheet 4.1: L
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
2.0 Overview California Rapid Asses
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
2.3 Developmental Framework Califor
Page 31 and 32:
KEY SERVICES Short- or long-term su
Page 33 and 34:
3.0 Summary California Rapid Assess
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60: 4.0 Summary California Rapid Assess
Page 61 and 62: California Rapid Assessment Method
Page 69 and 70: 4.2 Attribute 2: Hydrology Californ
Page 77 and 78: Condition Indicators of Channel Equ
Page 87 and 88: 4.3.2 Topographic Complexity Califo
Page 89 and 90: Rating A B C D Rating A B C D Calif
Page 105 and 106: Emergent Monocots with Canopy Calif
Page 109: California Rapid Assessment Method
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Appendix VI: List of Vernal Pool Pl
Page 173:
Laurel % Steve Landscape Joshua Ave
show all

(CRAM) For Wetlands User's Manual Version 5.0.2

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?