(CRAM) For Wetlands User's Manual Version 5.0.2

More documents

Recommendations

Info

California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands v. 5.0.2 – Chapter 4 Worksheet 4.7: Structural Patch Types for Vernal Pool Systems Identify each type of patch that is observed in the AA and enter the total number of observed patch types in Table 4.16 below. STRUCTURAL PATCH TYPE (check for presence) Small individual pools Large individual pools Small swales Large swales More than 1 pool cluster (a set of 3 or more interconnected pools with nearest neighbors less than 10 m apart) Drainage branches (more than 1 drainage branch) Simply-shaped pools (mostly round or oval) Complexly-shaped pools (not mostly round or oval) Plant hummocks Mima-mounds Animal burrows Bare soil Soil cracks 70 Vernal Pool Systems Total Possible 13 No. Observed Patch Types (enter here and use in Table 4.16 below) Table 4.16: Rating of Structural Patch Richness (based on results from worksheets). Rating Confined Riverine, Playas, Springs & Seeps, Individual Vernal Pools Vernal Pool Systems and Depressional Estuarine Nonconfined Riverine, Lacustrine A ≥ 8 ≥ 11 ≥ 9 ≥ 12 B 6 – 7 8 – 10 6 – 8 9 – 11 C 4 – 5 5 – 7 3 – 5 6 – 8 D ≤ 3 ≤ 4 ≤ 2 ≤ 5
4.3.2 Topographic Complexity California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands v. 5.0.2 – Chapter 4 A. Definition: Topographic complexity refers to the micro- and macro-topographic relief within a wetland due to physical, abiotic features and elevations gradients. B. Rationale: Topographic complexity promotes variable hydroperiods and concomitant moisture gradients that, in turn, promote ecological complexity by increasing the spatial and temporal variability in energy dissipation, surface water storage, groundwater recharge, particulate matter detention, cycling of elements and compounds, and habitat dynamics. Areas that are aerated due to flow across complex surfaces may promote volatilization of compounds, or re-suspension and export of water-borne material. C. Seasonality: This metric is not sensitive to seasonality. D. Field Indicators: Topographic complexity is assessed by noting the overall variability in physical patches and topographic features (Table 4.17 and Figure 4.6). Care must be taken to distinguish indicators of topographic complexity or habitat features within a wetland from different kinds of wetlands. For each type of wetland, topographic complexity can be evaluated by observing the number of elevational features that affect moisture gradients or that influence the path of water flow along a transect across the AA, and the amount of micro-topographic relief along the gradients or flow paths. Topographic gradients may be indicated by plant assemblages with different inundation/saturation or salinity tolerances. Tables 4.18a-d provide narratives for rating Topographic Complexity for all wetland types. Table 4.17: Typical indicators of Macro- and Micro-topographic Complexity for each wetland type. Type Examples of Topographic Features Depressional and Playas Estuarine Lacustrine Riverine Slope Wetlands Vernal Pools and Pool Systems pools, islands, bars, mounds or hummocks, variegated shorelines, soil cracks, partially buried debris, plant hummocks, livestock tracks channels large and small, islands, bars, pannes, potholes, natural levees, shellfish beds, hummocks, slump blocks, first-order tidal creeks, soil cracks, partially buried debris, plant hummocks islands, bars, boulders, cliffs, benches, variegated shorelines, cobble, boulders, partially buried debris, plant hummocks pools, runs, glides, pits, ponds, hummocks, bars, debris jams, cobble, boulders, slump blocks, tree-fall holes, plant hummocks pools, runnels, plant hummocks, burrows, plant hummocks, cobbles, boulders, partially buried debris, cattle or sheep tracks soil cracks, “mima-mounds,” rivulets between pools or along swales, cobble, plant hummocks, cattle or sheep tracks 71
Page 1 and 2:
California Rapid Assessment Method
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
LIST OF WORKSHEETS Worksheet 4.1: L
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
2.0 Overview California Rapid Asses
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
2.3 Developmental Framework Califor
Page 31 and 32:
KEY SERVICES Short- or long-term su
Page 33 and 34:
3.0 Summary California Rapid Assess
Page 35 and 36: California Rapid Assessment Method
Page 59 and 60: 4.0 Summary California Rapid Assess
Page 69 and 70: 4.2 Attribute 2: Hydrology Californ
Page 77 and 78: Condition Indicators of Channel Equ
Page 85: California Rapid Assessment Method
Page 89 and 90: Rating A B C D Rating A B C D Calif
Page 105 and 106: Emergent Monocots with Canopy Calif
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Appendix VI: List of Vernal Pool Pl
Page 173:
Laurel % Steve Landscape Joshua Ave
show all

(CRAM) For Wetlands User's Manual Version 5.0.2

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?