(CRAM) For Wetlands User's Manual Version 5.0.2

More documents

Recommendations

Info

California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands v. 5.0.2 – Chapter 4 C. Seasonality: Water source should be evaluated during the dry season. D. Office and Field Indicators: The assessment of this metric is the same for all wetland types. It can be assessed initially in the office using the site imaging, and then revised based on the field visit. For all wetlands, this metric focuses on direct sources of non-tidal water as defined above. The natural sources will tend to be more obvious than the unnatural sources. Evaluation of this metric should therefore emphasize the identification of the unnatural sources or diversions that directly affect the dry season conditions of the AA. The office work should initially focus on the immediate margin of the AA and its wetland, and then expand to include the smallest watershed or storm drain system that directly contributes to the AA or its immediate environment, such as another part of the same wetland or adjacent reach of the same riverine system within about 2km upstream of the AA. Landscape indicators of unnatural water sources include adjacent intensive development, irrigated agriculture, and wastewater treatment discharge. The typical suite of natural water sources differs among the wetland types. The effects of changing the natural sources or modifying them also differ among the types. The following discussion may be helpful in understanding these differences and recognizing them in the field. Estuarine: This metric is focused on the non-tidal water sources that account for the aqueous salinity regime of the AA during the early and middle months of the dry season, regardless of the time of year when these sources exist. The focus is usually on the tidal water that enters and exits the AA across the associated foreshore, as well as any local freshwater seeps or artificial sources of non-saline water that enter the site across its backshore. To assess the water source, the plant species composition of the wetland should be compared to what is expected, in terms of the position of the wetland along the salinity gradient of the estuary, as adjusted for the overall wetness of the water year. In general, altered sources are indicated by vegetation that is either more tolerant of saline conditions or less tolerant than would be expected. If the plant community is unexpectedly salt-tolerant, then an unnatural decrease in freshwater supply is indicated. Conversely, if the community is less salt-tolerant than expected, than an unnatural increase in freshwater is indicated. Slope Wetlands: Ground water is the source of water for seeps and springs (i.e., slope wetlands). It is generally expected that the source is perennial and relatively constant in volume throughout most years. The water source can be assessed, therefore, based on plant indicators of its permanence and consistency. The hydrologic needs of many plant species commonly found in wetlands have been determined (Reed 1988). Riverine, Depressional, Lacustrine, and Playas: The natural sources of water for these wetlands are mainly direct rainfall, groundwater discharge, runoff, and riverine flows. Whether the wetlands are perennial or seasonal, alterations in the water sources result in changes in either the high water or low water levels. Such changes can be assessed based on the patterns of plant growth along the wetland margins or across the bottom of the wetlands. 54
California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands v. 5.0.2 – Chapter 4 Vernal Pools: The hydrology of vernal pools and pool systems depends mainly on direct rainfall and runoff from the adjacent upland. Sub-surface flows between pools can be subtle, multi-directional, and difficult to assess, but significant during wet years. The effects of changes in water sources can be assessed according to the distribution, abundance, and size of individual pools and pool systems, as well as the pattern of plant zonation and interspersion. Table 4.9: Rating for Water Source. Rating Alternative States A B C D Freshwater sources that affect the dry season condition of the AA, such as its flow characteristics, hydroperiod, or salinity regime, are precipitation, groundwater, and/or natural runoff, or natural flow from an adjacent freshwater body, or the AA naturally lacks water in the dry season. There is no indication that dry season conditions are substantially controlled by artificial water sources. Freshwater sources that affect the dry season condition of the AA are mostly natural, but also obviously include occasional or small effects of modified hydrology. Indications of such anthropogenic inputs include developed land or irrigated agricultural land that comprises less than 20% of the immediate drainage basin within about 2 km upstream of the AA, or that is characterized by the presence of a few small stormdrains or scattered homes with septic systems. No large point sources or dams control the overall hydrology of the AA. Freshwater sources that affect the dry season conditions of the AA are primarily urban runoff, direct irrigation, pumped water, artificially impounded water, water remaining after diversions, regulated releases of water through a dam, or other artificial hydrology. Indications of substantial artificial hydrology include developed or irrigated agricultural land that comprises more than 20% of the immediate drainage basin within about 2 km upstream of the AA, or the presence of major point source discharges that obviously control the hydrology of the AA. OR Freshwater sources that affect the dry season conditions of the AA are substantially controlled by known diversions of water or other withdrawals directly from the AA, its encompassing wetland, or from its drainage basin within 2 km of the AA. Natural, freshwater sources that affect the dry season conditions of the AA have been eliminated based on the following indicators: impoundment of all possible wet season inflows, diversion of all dryseason inflow, predominance of xeric vegetation, etc. 55
Page 1 and 2:
California Rapid Assessment Method
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
LIST OF WORKSHEETS Worksheet 4.1: L
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20: California Rapid Assessment Method
Page 25 and 26: 2.0 Overview California Rapid Asses
Page 29 and 30: 2.3 Developmental Framework Califor
Page 31 and 32: KEY SERVICES Short- or long-term su
Page 33 and 34: 3.0 Summary California Rapid Assess
Page 59 and 60: 4.0 Summary California Rapid Assess
Page 69: 4.2 Attribute 2: Hydrology Californ
Page 77 and 78: Condition Indicators of Channel Equ
Page 87 and 88: 4.3.2 Topographic Complexity Califo
Page 89 and 90: Rating A B C D Rating A B C D Calif
Page 105 and 106: Emergent Monocots with Canopy Calif
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Appendix VI: List of Vernal Pool Pl
Page 173:
Laurel % Steve Landscape Joshua Ave
show all

(CRAM) For Wetlands User's Manual Version 5.0.2

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?