12.01.2013 Views

(CRAM) For Wetlands User's Manual Version 5.0.2

(CRAM) For Wetlands User's Manual Version 5.0.2

(CRAM) For Wetlands User's Manual Version 5.0.2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

California Rapid Assessment Method for <strong>Wetlands</strong> v. <strong>5.0.2</strong> – Chapter 4<br />

Non-native species owe their occurrence in California to the actions of people ever since shortly<br />

before Euro American contact. “Invasive” species are non-native species that tend to dominate<br />

one or more plant layers within an AA. <strong>CRAM</strong> uses the California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-<br />

IPC) list to determine the invasive status of plants, with augmentation by regional experts.<br />

B. Rationale: The functions of whole-wetland systems are optimized when a rich native flora<br />

dominates the plant community, and when the botanical structure of the wetland is complex in<br />

3-dimensional space, due to species diversity and recruitment, and resulting in suitable habitat<br />

for multiple animal species. Much of the natural microbial, invertebrate, and vertebrate<br />

communities of wetlands are adjusted to the architectural forms, phenologies, detrital materials,<br />

and chemistry of the native vegetation. Furthermore, the physical form of wetlands is partly the<br />

result of interactions between plants and physical processes, especially hydrology. A sudden<br />

change in the dominant species, such as results from plant invasions, can have cascading effects<br />

on whole-system form, structure, and function.<br />

C. Seasonality: This suite of metrics is ideally assessed during the latter third of the growing<br />

season, when all plant layers have developed to their full extent.<br />

D. Field Indicators: The Plant Community Metric is assessed in terms of the similarity between<br />

the dominant species composition of the plant community and what is expected based on<br />

<strong>CRAM</strong> verification and validation studies, regional botanical surveys, and historical resources.<br />

This metric requires the ability to recognize the most common and abundant plants species of<br />

wetlands. When a <strong>CRAM</strong> field team lacks the necessary botanical expertise, voucher specimens<br />

will need to be collected using standard plant presses and site documentation. This can greatly<br />

increase the time required to complete a <strong>CRAM</strong> assessment.<br />

4.4.1.1 Number of Plant Layers Present<br />

The first submetric of the Plant Community Metric is the Number of Plant Layers Present in the<br />

AA. This submetric does not pertain to Vernal Pools or Playas. Plant layers play a large role in<br />

the assessment of the biotic structure attribute. They are distinguished from one another by the<br />

differences in average maximum heights of their co-dominant plant species. <strong>For</strong> the Other<br />

Depressional <strong>Wetlands</strong>, plus Estuarine, Lacustrine, and Non-confined Riverine <strong>Wetlands</strong> a<br />

maximum of five plant layers are recognized by <strong>CRAM</strong>. <strong>For</strong> Slope <strong>Wetlands</strong> and Confined<br />

Riverine <strong>Wetlands</strong>, a maximum of four layers are recognized. To be counted in <strong>CRAM</strong>, a layer<br />

must cover at least 5% of the portion of the AA that is suitable for the layer (see Appendix II). This<br />

would be the littoral zone of lakes and depressional wetlands for the one aquatic layer, called<br />

“floating.” The “short,” “medium,” and “tall” layers might be found throughout the non-aquatic<br />

areas of each wetland class, except in areas of exposed bedrock, mudflat, beaches, active point<br />

bars, etc. The “very tall” layer is usually expected to occur along the backshore, except in<br />

forested wetlands.<br />

It is essential that the layers be identified by the actual plant heights (i.e., the approximate<br />

maximum heights) of plant species in the AA, regardless of the growth potential of the species.<br />

<strong>For</strong> example, in a riverine system a young sapling redwood between 0.5 m and 0.75 m tall would<br />

belong to the “medium” layer, even though in the future the same individual redwood might<br />

belong to the “very tall” layer. Some species might belong to multiple plant layers. <strong>For</strong> example,<br />

groves of red alders of all different ages and heights might collectively represent all four non-<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!