12.01.2013 Views

3. Postdoctoral Program - MSRI

3. Postdoctoral Program - MSRI

3. Postdoctoral Program - MSRI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

C 2 k as k goes to infinity (with inclusion of fixed points as the structure maps) we<br />

get another spectral sequence computing π∗ limk T HH(Z[C2]) C 2 k .<br />

Using calculations from our paper “RO(S 1 )-graded TR-groups of Fp, Z and<br />

ℓ” we understand the E2-term of this spectral sequence fairly well, but we kept<br />

getting the wrong answer in cases we can understand for different reasons. Finally<br />

we figured out that this happens because the spectral sequence does not converge!<br />

In retrospect that should not be too surprising, because we built T HH(Z[C2]) as<br />

a direct limit, and we cannot expect direct limits and inverse limits to commute.<br />

We still have a spectral sequence converging to π∗T HH(Z[C2]) C 2 k for each k, so<br />

I am still hopeful that our method will tell us something interesting.<br />

2.4. Algebraic K-theory in multiple variables. This is joint work with Teena<br />

Gerhardt, Mike Hill, and Ayelet Lindenstrauss. We do have some concrete results,<br />

but nothing is yet written up and it is still work in progress. We want to understand<br />

K(k[x1, . . . , xn]/(x a1<br />

1<br />

, . . . , xan<br />

n )), which we can do if we understand T HH of that<br />

ring sufficiently well.<br />

By a straightforward generalization of previous work of Hesselholt and Madsen<br />

we can write T HH as the iterated cofiber of a certain n-cube of easier-to-understand<br />

spectra. The key observation is that this is actually an n-cube of cyclotomic spectra,<br />

which essentially means that the K-theory is given by taking the iterated cofiber<br />

of a related n-cube of spectra.<br />

If k = Fp and p does not divide any of the ai’s we can compute the K-theory<br />

groups explicitly. Similarly, if k = Z we can compute the rationalized K-theory<br />

groups explicitly.<br />

Our hope is that there is some underlying structure, a generalized Witt vector<br />

construction, which gives a unified description of the K-groups in all cases. But<br />

that part is still work in progress.<br />

2.5. Structured Quartet Research Ensemble. The American Institute of Mathematics<br />

(AIM) has a program called SQuaRE which allows a small group to meet to<br />

work on a specific program. During the fellowship period (and immediately after) I<br />

met Andrew Blumberg, Teena Gerhardt, and Mike Hill twice at AIMs center inside<br />

Fry’s electronics store in Palo Alto, and once in Chicago to work on “algebraic<br />

K-groups”.<br />

One of the problems we were interested in is that of algebraic K-theory of Thom<br />

spectra. Given a loop map f : X → BF , where BF classifies stable spherical<br />

fibrations, we get a ring spectrum T h(f). In previous work Andrew Blumberg and<br />

coauthors developed a good model of T HH(T h(f)) as a spectrum. However, to<br />

be able to approach K(T h(f)) we need to understand T HH(T h(f)) as a genuine<br />

S 1 -spectrum.<br />

After some early missteps, we believe we now have such a model of T HH(T h(f))<br />

as a genuine (indeed cyclotomic) S 1 -spectrum. In the course of our work we believe<br />

we also managed to came up with a better model of T HH of a commutative ring<br />

spectrum as the left adjoint of the forgetful functor from commutative genuine S 1 -<br />

spectra to commutative ring spectra. This is important because the current model<br />

of T HH as a cyclotomic spectrum is rather complicated and not very conceptual.<br />

Since nothing has yet been written down this is still work in progress.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!