15.01.2013 Views

E_mg_GB_03_vorne-29_3_04

E_mg_GB_03_vorne-29_3_04

E_mg_GB_03_vorne-29_3_04

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

152<br />

Section 307 (I) of the H<strong>GB</strong> states that minority interests must be reported as a component of shareholders’<br />

equity. Minority interests are also contained in the Group’s net income or loss for the year.<br />

Under U.S. GAAP, however, minority interests are reported not under shareholders’ equity, but<br />

separately between equity and debt capital. Consequently, minority interests must be recognized<br />

as a separate income or expense item before the consolidated net income or loss.<br />

Differences in Accounting Policies and Reporting<br />

Reinstatement of Original Values for Long-Lived Assets<br />

If an asset has been written down due to impairment pursuant to section 253 (II) and (III) of the<br />

H<strong>GB</strong>, the requirement to reinstate its original value under section 280 (I) of the H<strong>GB</strong> states that this<br />

value may not be retained if the reasons for the write-down no longer apply at a later balance sheet<br />

date. In such cases, the asset must be written up.<br />

Under U.S. GAAP, the carrying amount of a long-lived asset has to be tested for impairment if<br />

events or changed circumstances indicate that the asset’s carrying amount may exceed its fair value.<br />

Impairment is measured by comparing the estimated future discounted pre-tax cash flows of the<br />

related asset to its carrying amount. SFAS 144 (‘Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-<br />

Lived Assets’) states that original values may not be reinstated even if the reasons for such a writedown<br />

no longer apply.<br />

Leases<br />

The accounting treatment of leases is not explicitly stated in the H<strong>GB</strong>. As a rule, we have therefore<br />

based our accounting treatment on the tax authorities’ pronouncements on leases, which state that<br />

leased assets should generally be capitalized by the lessor.<br />

U.S. GAAP contain detailed rules on the recognition of leases, especially SFAS 13 (‘Accounting for<br />

Leases’). These distinguish between capital leases and operating leases, depending on who bears<br />

the main risks and derives the main opportunities arising from use of the leased assets and is therefore<br />

deemed to be the beneficial owner. With capital leases, the lessee, as beneficial owner, has to<br />

capitalize the leased assets, while the lessor has to carry them as an asset in the case of operating<br />

leases.<br />

Valuation of Inventories<br />

Inventories are reported at cost. Section 255 (II) of the H<strong>GB</strong> states that manufacturing costs may<br />

include not just compulsory items such as direct material and production costs and specific manufacturing<br />

costs, but also attributable manufacturing overheads and administrative costs, depreciation,<br />

and the cost of certain social benefits. By contrast, U.S. GAAP (ARB 43) state that, in addition to<br />

direct costs, production-related overheads, depreciation, and production-related administrative costs<br />

have to be recognized as part of manufacturing cost.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!