Publications - MPIfG
Publications - MPIfG
Publications - MPIfG
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
10 Project Areas and Research Projects<br />
The Research Program<br />
The general theme of research at the institute is the conditions under which modern<br />
societies may be able to solve problems through collective action. The research<br />
program of the period from 1986–1995 focused on historically and internationally<br />
comparative studies of the interaction between political-administrative<br />
intervention and societal self-organization in selected sectors “close to the state” –<br />
namely in health care systems, organized research systems and large technical<br />
infrastructure systems, with a special emphasis on telecommunications. In the<br />
new program, the subjects of empirical research have changed in response to the<br />
growing importance of market interaction and international competition even in<br />
sectors that were formerly protected and tightly controlled by the authority of the<br />
nation state. In telecommunications, for instance, privatization and deregulation<br />
have progressed widely. The same holds true for other sectors traditionally close<br />
to the state, such as air and rail transportation, road hauling, the electronic media<br />
and energy supply. Similarly, the influence of government policy on industrial<br />
research has declined. Looking back at the last decade, we find a growing importance<br />
of market coordination in almost all functional sectors. This can be attributed<br />
in part to changes in political ideologies and perceptions of reality. But it is<br />
also a response to actual constraints presented by European integration, economic<br />
globalization and international regime competition, which have tended to make<br />
“market-correcting” national systems of regulation appear to be liabilities for<br />
international competitiveness.<br />
Real-world changes like these require a historically grounded definition of the<br />
questions guiding the institute’s second program period. While we continue to be