16.01.2013 Views

Publications - MPIfG

Publications - MPIfG

Publications - MPIfG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

30<br />

<strong>MPIfG</strong> Report 1999–2002<br />

states. While this expansion of the judicial power and independence<br />

in the Union has been widely explored, the issue of<br />

the geographical and temporal variations of the number of<br />

social cases referred by national courts to the ECJ remains<br />

neglected. The existence of substantive differences between<br />

Community-level legislation and national-level legislation<br />

and practices partly explains this uneven influence. Equally,<br />

the question of the different national judges’ “attitudes”<br />

towards Community law is also often mentioned. While not<br />

unfounded, such explanations are not very satisfactory. The<br />

objective of this postdoctoral project is to examine why, how<br />

and under what conditions national courts mobilize Com-<br />

Shareholder Value and Codetermination in<br />

Germany<br />

Martin Höpner<br />

This doctoral project examines the shareholder orientation of<br />

large German companies. During the 1990s, German companies<br />

such as Veba, Hoechst or Bayer began to change their<br />

policy towards investors. Companies introduced profitability<br />

targets and stock option plans, set up investor relations<br />

departments and changed their accounting standards in order<br />

to improve their relationship with shareholders. The increasing<br />

significance of shareholder value orientation in large<br />

firms has been attributed to several factors such as the internationalization<br />

of companies, changes in ownership and<br />

company structures, or the changing labor market of top<br />

managers. The project tests these hypotheses using econometric<br />

methods. It also examines the consequences of shareholder<br />

orientation of large companies for the German system of<br />

industrial relations. It is assumed that works councils have<br />

different attitudes towards the shareholder strategies of management,<br />

depending on whether the company is a potential<br />

target for hostile takeovers or not. Project duration: January<br />

1999 to December 2002. Main project: The Impact of<br />

Internationalization on German Industrial Relations<br />

Martin Höpner<br />

Wer beherrscht die Unternehmen? Shareholder Value, Managerherrschaft<br />

und Mitbestimmung in Deutschland. Frankfurt<br />

a.M.: Campus, 2003, 265 pp.<br />

munity social law and resort to the Community judicial<br />

sphere. It aims at explaining the divergent degree, forms and<br />

dynamics of judicial politics throughout the Union. The study<br />

has drawn more general conclusions regarding the differential<br />

impact of European integration on judicial politics in the<br />

social field. Project duration: October 1998 to February 2000.<br />

Sabrina Tesoka<br />

Judicial Politics in the European Union: Its Impact on National<br />

Opportunity Structures for Gender Equality. <strong>MPIfG</strong> Discussion<br />

Paper 99/2. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of<br />

Societies, 1999, 30 pp.<br />

Regime Competition and Integration in Political Economy<br />

Completed Projects<br />

Wolfgang Streeck, Martin Höpner (eds.)<br />

Alle Macht dem Markt? Fallstudien zur Abwicklung der<br />

Deutschland AG. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus, 2003, 289 pp.<br />

Martin Höpner, Jürgen Beyer<br />

The Disintegration of Organised Capitalism: German Corporate<br />

Governance in the 1990s. In: Herbert Kitschelt, Wolfgang<br />

Streeck (eds.), Germany: Beyond the Stable State. Special Issue<br />

of West European Politics. London: Frank Cass Publishers<br />

(forthcoming 2003)<br />

Wolfgang Streeck, Martin Höpner<br />

Alle Macht dem Markt? Einleitung. In: Wolfgang Streeck,<br />

Martin Höpner (eds.), Alle Macht dem Markt? Fallstudien zur<br />

Abwicklung der Deutschland AG. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus,<br />

2003, 11–59<br />

Martin Höpner<br />

European Corporate Governance Reform and the German Party<br />

Paradox. <strong>MPIfG</strong> Discussion Paper 03/4. Cologne: Max Planck<br />

Institute for the Study of Societies, 2003, 45 pp.<br />

Martin Höpner<br />

Mehr Mitbestimmung durch Shareholder-Value? In: Die<br />

Mitbestimmung, No. 6/2002, Allianz für mehr Transparenz,<br />

2–24 (2002)<br />

Martin Höpner, Gregory Jackson<br />

Das deutsche System der Corporate Governance zwischen<br />

Persistenz und Konvergenz. In: Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie<br />

und Sozialpsychologie, Vol. 54, No. 4, 36–368 (2002)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!