Publications - MPIfG
Publications - MPIfG
Publications - MPIfG
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
30<br />
<strong>MPIfG</strong> Report 1999–2002<br />
states. While this expansion of the judicial power and independence<br />
in the Union has been widely explored, the issue of<br />
the geographical and temporal variations of the number of<br />
social cases referred by national courts to the ECJ remains<br />
neglected. The existence of substantive differences between<br />
Community-level legislation and national-level legislation<br />
and practices partly explains this uneven influence. Equally,<br />
the question of the different national judges’ “attitudes”<br />
towards Community law is also often mentioned. While not<br />
unfounded, such explanations are not very satisfactory. The<br />
objective of this postdoctoral project is to examine why, how<br />
and under what conditions national courts mobilize Com-<br />
Shareholder Value and Codetermination in<br />
Germany<br />
Martin Höpner<br />
This doctoral project examines the shareholder orientation of<br />
large German companies. During the 1990s, German companies<br />
such as Veba, Hoechst or Bayer began to change their<br />
policy towards investors. Companies introduced profitability<br />
targets and stock option plans, set up investor relations<br />
departments and changed their accounting standards in order<br />
to improve their relationship with shareholders. The increasing<br />
significance of shareholder value orientation in large<br />
firms has been attributed to several factors such as the internationalization<br />
of companies, changes in ownership and<br />
company structures, or the changing labor market of top<br />
managers. The project tests these hypotheses using econometric<br />
methods. It also examines the consequences of shareholder<br />
orientation of large companies for the German system of<br />
industrial relations. It is assumed that works councils have<br />
different attitudes towards the shareholder strategies of management,<br />
depending on whether the company is a potential<br />
target for hostile takeovers or not. Project duration: January<br />
1999 to December 2002. Main project: The Impact of<br />
Internationalization on German Industrial Relations<br />
Martin Höpner<br />
Wer beherrscht die Unternehmen? Shareholder Value, Managerherrschaft<br />
und Mitbestimmung in Deutschland. Frankfurt<br />
a.M.: Campus, 2003, 265 pp.<br />
munity social law and resort to the Community judicial<br />
sphere. It aims at explaining the divergent degree, forms and<br />
dynamics of judicial politics throughout the Union. The study<br />
has drawn more general conclusions regarding the differential<br />
impact of European integration on judicial politics in the<br />
social field. Project duration: October 1998 to February 2000.<br />
Sabrina Tesoka<br />
Judicial Politics in the European Union: Its Impact on National<br />
Opportunity Structures for Gender Equality. <strong>MPIfG</strong> Discussion<br />
Paper 99/2. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of<br />
Societies, 1999, 30 pp.<br />
Regime Competition and Integration in Political Economy<br />
Completed Projects<br />
Wolfgang Streeck, Martin Höpner (eds.)<br />
Alle Macht dem Markt? Fallstudien zur Abwicklung der<br />
Deutschland AG. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus, 2003, 289 pp.<br />
Martin Höpner, Jürgen Beyer<br />
The Disintegration of Organised Capitalism: German Corporate<br />
Governance in the 1990s. In: Herbert Kitschelt, Wolfgang<br />
Streeck (eds.), Germany: Beyond the Stable State. Special Issue<br />
of West European Politics. London: Frank Cass Publishers<br />
(forthcoming 2003)<br />
Wolfgang Streeck, Martin Höpner<br />
Alle Macht dem Markt? Einleitung. In: Wolfgang Streeck,<br />
Martin Höpner (eds.), Alle Macht dem Markt? Fallstudien zur<br />
Abwicklung der Deutschland AG. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus,<br />
2003, 11–59<br />
Martin Höpner<br />
European Corporate Governance Reform and the German Party<br />
Paradox. <strong>MPIfG</strong> Discussion Paper 03/4. Cologne: Max Planck<br />
Institute for the Study of Societies, 2003, 45 pp.<br />
Martin Höpner<br />
Mehr Mitbestimmung durch Shareholder-Value? In: Die<br />
Mitbestimmung, No. 6/2002, Allianz für mehr Transparenz,<br />
2–24 (2002)<br />
Martin Höpner, Gregory Jackson<br />
Das deutsche System der Corporate Governance zwischen<br />
Persistenz und Konvergenz. In: Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie<br />
und Sozialpsychologie, Vol. 54, No. 4, 36–368 (2002)