18.01.2013 Views

Image Reconstruction for 3D Lung Imaging - Department of Systems ...

Image Reconstruction for 3D Lung Imaging - Department of Systems ...

Image Reconstruction for 3D Lung Imaging - Department of Systems ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The presence <strong>of</strong> the electrodes is taken into account via appropriate boundary conditions<br />

which will appear as modifications to the equation <strong>for</strong> normal current, 2.6, on Γ. Electrode<br />

models are discussed in section 2.3.3. Equations 2.2 and 2.6 comprise the <strong>for</strong>ward<br />

problem in EIT and are used to find the voltage distribution within the medium. Analytic<br />

methods using series approximations [76][33] have been used to solve the <strong>for</strong>ward problem<br />

<strong>for</strong> simplified models such as a single contrast in a circular medium. However, solving the<br />

<strong>for</strong>ward problem <strong>for</strong> models with arbitrary geometries requires numerical techniques such<br />

as the finite element method. With such methods continuum problems <strong>of</strong> 2.2 and 2.6 are<br />

converted into discrete algebraic problems that can be solved with a computer.<br />

2.3 Finite Element Method<br />

The Finite Element Method (FEM) is a numerical analysis technique <strong>for</strong> obtaining approximate<br />

solutions to a wide variety <strong>of</strong> engineering problems. It was originally developed as<br />

a tool <strong>for</strong> aircraft design but has since been extended to many other fields including the<br />

modeling <strong>of</strong> electromagnetic and electrostatic fields [106]. Due to its ability to model arbitrary<br />

geometries and various boundary conditions the Finite Element Method is the most<br />

common method currently used <strong>for</strong> the numerical solution <strong>of</strong> EIT problems [92][100]. The<br />

following paragraphs borrow heavily from [75].<br />

In a continuum problem <strong>of</strong> any dimension the field variable, such as the electric potential<br />

in EIT, is defined over an infinite number <strong>of</strong> values because it is a function <strong>of</strong> the infinite<br />

number <strong>of</strong> points in the body. The finite element method first discretizes the medium under<br />

analysis into a finite number <strong>of</strong> elements collectively called a finite element mesh. Within<br />

each element the field variable is approximated by simple functions that are defined only<br />

within the individual element. The approximating functions (sometimes called interpolation<br />

or shape functions) are defined in terms <strong>of</strong> the values <strong>of</strong> the field variables at specified<br />

points on the element called nodes. Most EIT work uses linear shape functions in which all<br />

nodes lie on the element boundaries where adjacent elements are connected. Higher order<br />

shape functions will have interior nodes. In summary, the finite element method reduces<br />

a continuum problem <strong>of</strong> infinite dimension to a discrete problem <strong>of</strong> finite dimension in<br />

which the nodal values <strong>of</strong> the field variable and the interpolation functions <strong>for</strong> the elements<br />

completely define the behaviour <strong>of</strong> the field variable within the elements and the individual<br />

elements collectively define the behaviour <strong>of</strong> the field over the entire medium.<br />

There are three different methods typically used to <strong>for</strong>mulate Finite Element problems:<br />

1. Direct approach. The Direct approach is so called because <strong>of</strong> its origins in the direct<br />

stiffness method <strong>of</strong> structural analysis. The method is limited, however it is the most<br />

intuitive way to understand the finite element method.<br />

2. Variational approach. Element properties obtained by the direct approach can also<br />

be determined by the Variational approach which relies on the calculus <strong>of</strong> variations<br />

and involves extremizing a functional such as the potential energy. The variational<br />

approach is necessary to extend the finite element method to a class <strong>of</strong> problems that<br />

cannot be handled by direct methods. For example problems involving elements with<br />

non-constant conductivity, <strong>for</strong> problems using higher order interpolation functions and<br />

<strong>for</strong> element shapes other than triangles and tetrahedrons.<br />

3. Method <strong>of</strong> Weighted Residuals (MWR). The most versatile approach to deriving element<br />

properties is the Method <strong>of</strong> Weighted Residuals. The weighted residuals approach<br />

begins with the governing equations <strong>of</strong> the problem and proceeds without<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!