18.01.2013 Views

Image Reconstruction for 3D Lung Imaging - Department of Systems ...

Image Reconstruction for 3D Lung Imaging - Department of Systems ...

Image Reconstruction for 3D Lung Imaging - Department of Systems ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

is solved iteratively with the linearized operator being updated and re-applied at each<br />

iteration. However most difference image applications assume that the conductivity change<br />

over the time interval is small so that a single step with the linearized operator is sufficient to<br />

produce a solution that is “good enough.” The linear operator is developed as a Jacobian<br />

or sensitivity matrix. On a model with E elements and M boundary measurements the<br />

Jacobian is a M × E matrix. The Jacobian matrix is calculated column by column with<br />

the i th column describing the effect <strong>of</strong> the change in conductivity <strong>of</strong> the i th element on the<br />

signal, z measured between electrode pairs.<br />

3.2 Jacobian Derivation<br />

In section 2.1.2 both static and difference image reconstructions were modelled as ˆx = Bz.<br />

For difference imaging ˆx = ∆σ = σ2 − σ1 is the change in a finite element conductivity<br />

distribution due to a change in difference signal, z = v2 − v1, over a time interval (t1,t2).<br />

By convention the signal at t1 is considered to be the reference frame and the signal at t2<br />

is the data frame. Since σ1 is unknown, ˆx is interpreted as the change in conductivity with<br />

respect to the unknown initial conductivity x = ∆σ.<br />

The Jacobian <strong>for</strong> a linearized <strong>for</strong>ward problem is developed as follows using the notation<br />

<strong>of</strong> difference imaging: Construct a matrix H such that<br />

z = Hx + n (3.1)<br />

where H is the Jacobian or sensitivity matrix and n is the measurement system noise,<br />

assumed to be uncorrelated additive white Gaussian (AWGN). Each element i, j, <strong>of</strong> H is<br />

calculated as Hij = ∂zi<br />

�<br />

�<br />

and relates a small change in the ith difference measurement<br />

� ∂xj σ0<br />

to a small change in the conductivity <strong>of</strong> jth element [4]. H is a function <strong>of</strong> the FEM, the<br />

current injection pattern, and the background conductivity. A homogenous background<br />

conductivity with σ0 = 1 <strong>for</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the elements is used.<br />

In order to calculate the linear approximation matrix, H, the signal<br />

z = v2 − v1<br />

(3.2)<br />

is expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>ward model as z = T[V(σ2)]−T[V(σ1)]. T[] is an extraction<br />

operator that produces the measurements between electrodes from the nodal voltage matrix<br />

V. Under the assumption that the conductivity changes by only a small amount between<br />

the two times we can use σ1 = σ and σ2 = σ+∆σ which gives z = T [V(σ) − V(σ + ∆σ)].<br />

Further algebraic manipulation gives<br />

�<br />

�<br />

V(σ + ∆σ) − V(σ)<br />

z = T − ∆σ<br />

∆σ<br />

In the limit as ∆σ → 0:<br />

V(σ + ∆σ) − V(σ)<br />

lim<br />

∆σ→0 ∆σ<br />

= ∂V(σ)<br />

∂σ<br />

Neglecting noise, this allows us to write the linearized <strong>for</strong>m, equation 3.1, as<br />

�<br />

z = T − ∂V(σ)<br />

�<br />

∆σ<br />

∂σ<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!