18.01.2013 Views

Planning for Sport and Active Recreation Facilities ... - Brent Council

Planning for Sport and Active Recreation Facilities ... - Brent Council

Planning for Sport and Active Recreation Facilities ... - Brent Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Map 31: Travel time map – sports halls<br />

Map 32: Personal share – sports halls<br />

57<br />

Symbol<br />

Personal Share of <strong>Sport</strong>s Halls<br />

Map 32 indicates areas within the borough which have<br />

high personal share (red) <strong>and</strong> low personal share (green).<br />

The map shows that residents who live in the South<br />

of the Borough have less personal share of sports halls<br />

compared to wards such as Queensbury <strong>and</strong> Fryent.<br />

Compared to London, <strong>Brent</strong> residents have a personal<br />

share of 0.76m² compared to London’s average of<br />

0.89m² <strong>and</strong> the national average of 1.43 m² per resident.<br />

Travel Time<br />

(minutes walking)<br />

0.42 - 4.632<br />

4.633 - 8.844<br />

8.845 - 13.056<br />

13.057 - 17.268<br />

17.269 - 21.48<br />

<strong>Facilities</strong> <strong>Planning</strong> Model<br />

<strong>Sport</strong>s Halls Run 1- key findings -<br />

current population <strong>and</strong> provision<br />

The findings of the <strong>Facilities</strong> <strong>Planning</strong><br />

Model (FPM) run <strong>for</strong> 2007 identifies<br />

that the capacity of <strong>Brent</strong>’s sports halls<br />

is above the London average. In fact, it<br />

is the second highest level of sports hall<br />

capacity across the study area (the seven<br />

neighbouring boroughs). However,<br />

because of issues of accessibility, dem<strong>and</strong><br />

outstrips capacity considerably across the study area as a<br />

whole.<br />

The FPM only includes sports halls with some public<br />

accessibility <strong>and</strong> over 459 m2 in size (3 badminton<br />

courts), as it is stated that sports halls need to<br />

be this size to make a significant impact on<br />

the community. However, smaller halls, as<br />

identified earlier, do play a part in meeting<br />

some local dem<strong>and</strong>. This means that,<br />

in total <strong>for</strong> this study, there were 48<br />

badminton courts located on ten sites.<br />

Currently within <strong>Brent</strong>, unmet dem<strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>s at 28.6%<br />

of the population - this equates to approximately 18<br />

publicly accessible badminton courts. The South East of<br />

the borough has the highest shortage at present <strong>and</strong><br />

17% of satisfied dem<strong>and</strong> is imported from Westminster,<br />

with 15% of dem<strong>and</strong> imported from Kensington &<br />

Chelsea. Some residents living in Welsh Harp <strong>and</strong><br />

Dollis Hill wards live outside a 1 mile catchment of a<br />

publicly accessible sports hall. Graph 7 illustrates the<br />

boroughs population that has access to sports halls, <strong>and</strong><br />

it shows that 14% of the borough do not have access<br />

to any publicly accessible sport halls. Compared to the<br />

neighbouring boroughs, this is only better than Barnet<br />

<strong>and</strong> Hammersmith <strong>and</strong> Fulham’s score.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!