Planning for Sport and Active Recreation Facilities ... - Brent Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Map 31: Travel time map – sports halls Map 32: Personal share – sports halls 57 Symbol Personal Share of Sports Halls Map 32 indicates areas within the borough which have high personal share (red) and low personal share (green). The map shows that residents who live in the South of the Borough have less personal share of sports halls compared to wards such as Queensbury and Fryent. Compared to London, Brent residents have a personal share of 0.76m² compared to London’s average of 0.89m² and the national average of 1.43 m² per resident. Travel Time (minutes walking) 0.42 - 4.632 4.633 - 8.844 8.845 - 13.056 13.057 - 17.268 17.269 - 21.48 Facilities Planning Model Sports Halls Run 1- key findings - current population and provision The findings of the Facilities Planning Model (FPM) run for 2007 identifies that the capacity of Brent’s sports halls is above the London average. In fact, it is the second highest level of sports hall capacity across the study area (the seven neighbouring boroughs). However, because of issues of accessibility, demand outstrips capacity considerably across the study area as a whole. The FPM only includes sports halls with some public accessibility and over 459 m2 in size (3 badminton courts), as it is stated that sports halls need to be this size to make a significant impact on the community. However, smaller halls, as identified earlier, do play a part in meeting some local demand. This means that, in total for this study, there were 48 badminton courts located on ten sites. Currently within Brent, unmet demand stands at 28.6% of the population - this equates to approximately 18 publicly accessible badminton courts. The South East of the borough has the highest shortage at present and 17% of satisfied demand is imported from Westminster, with 15% of demand imported from Kensington & Chelsea. Some residents living in Welsh Harp and Dollis Hill wards live outside a 1 mile catchment of a publicly accessible sports hall. Graph 7 illustrates the boroughs population that has access to sports halls, and it shows that 14% of the borough do not have access to any publicly accessible sport halls. Compared to the neighbouring boroughs, this is only better than Barnet and Hammersmith and Fulham’s score.
Chapter Six Indoor Sports Facility Provision Graph 7: % population within 20 mins walking time of sports halls 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% AREA TOTAL % % Population within 20mins walking time of hall sites Brent Barnet Camden # Ealing Hammersmith & Fullham Unmet demand in 1km square Expressed as badminton courts (rounded) 2 to 2 (6) 1 to 2 (25) >0 to 1 (101) Harrow Kensington & Chelsea Westminster Map 33 provides a visual representation of the distribution of unmet demand –the light blue shades in the map towards the south east of the borough show areas where there is high unmet demand and where there is a need for at least 2 badminton courts and the green blocks show where there is need for 1-2 badminton courts to remove the unmet demand. It should be noted that the FPM analysis is only inclusive of publicly accessible sports hall space. Map 33: Unmet demand in 2007 – sports hall Chapter Six - Indoor Sports Facility Provision 2+ Halls 2 Halls 1 Hall No Halls 58
Page 1:
Planning for Sport and Active Recre
Page 4 and 5:
Foreword from Sport England In June
Page 6 and 7:
1 In early 2007, Sport England appr
Page 8 and 9:
3 of satisfaction, low levels of pr
Page 10 and 11:
5 Cricket Pitches Cricket is a loca
Page 12 and 13: 7 The need for a strategy In 2006,
Page 14 and 15: 9 Contents of the Strategy This rev
Page 16 and 17: 11 Brent is a place of contrasts. I
Page 18 and 19: 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20
Page 20 and 21: Map 5: The most and least income de
Page 22 and 23: Map 8: Public Transport Accessibili
Page 24 and 25: 19 Sport England have calculated sm
Page 26 and 27: 21 Brent is in the bottom national
Page 28 and 29: 23 Table 9: 2006 Active People surv
Page 30 and 31: 25 The development of facilities fo
Page 32 and 33: 27 and implemented’ planning poli
Page 34 and 35: 29 • We will develop a programme
Page 36 and 37: • Promoting Wembley as a major vi
Page 38 and 39: 33 There are two marketing tools th
Page 40 and 41: 35 incomes. They tend to suffer fro
Page 42 and 43: 37 Kev The other dominant group wit
Page 44 and 45: 39 Chloe The map identifies smaller
Page 46 and 47: 41 This chapter describes Sport Eng
Page 48 and 49: 43 Facilities Planning Model Sport
Page 50 and 51: 45 The Council is only one of many
Page 52 and 53: Vale Farm Sports Centre is showing
Page 54 and 55: 49 The locations of the swimming po
Page 56 and 57: 35000 30000 27500 25000 22500 20000
Page 58 and 59: 53 Using this classification Active
Page 60 and 61: 55 Facility Name Postcode Ward Cour
Page 64 and 65: 59 Sports Halls Run 2 - projected p
Page 66 and 67: 61 Site Name Postcode Ward Stations
Page 68 and 69: 63 Gym Memberships The table below
Page 70 and 71: 65 Table 19: Capacity Ratios - indo
Page 72 and 73: Table 20: Capacity Ratios - indoor
Page 75 and 76: Chapter six Outdoor Sports Faciliti
Page 83 and 84: Four STP’s are available on a pay
Page 93 and 94: Chapter Seven Priorities for Future
Page 101: Chapter Seven Priorities for Future
Page 104 and 105: 99 half of the expected population
Page 106 and 107: Local Standards for Outdoor Sports
Page 108 and 109: Table 43: Summary of Local Standard
Page 110 and 111: 105 Partnerships The delivery of th
Page 112 and 113:
Map 52: Secondary schools in Brent
Page 114 and 115:
sports grounds from development, op
Page 116 and 117:
Graph Map Table Description Page Ma
Page 118 and 119:
Graph Map Table Description Page 11
Page 120:
Produce by Brent Council’s Sports
show all

Planning for Sport and Active Recreation Facilities ... - Brent Council

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?