18.01.2013 Views

Adil GÜNER, Vehbi ESER - optima

Adil GÜNER, Vehbi ESER - optima

Adil GÜNER, Vehbi ESER - optima

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LESSONS ON INTEGRATION FROM A HALF-CENTURY OF<br />

CHANGE IN PLANT SYSTEMATICS: CARLINA AND OTHER<br />

EXAMPLES<br />

Friedrich EHRENDORFER<br />

University of Vienna, Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany,<br />

Vienna, Austria: friedrich.ehrendorfer@univie.ac.at<br />

Since the middle of the last century the author has witnessed and was actively involved in the<br />

development of systematic and evolutionary botany from a solid “traditional” basis to what it is<br />

today. This is briefly reviewed with references to karyo- and biosystematic work on Galium,<br />

Asperula and Knautia, extensions into the chemosystematics of Asteraceae-Anthemideae and<br />

Rutaceae, conflicts with purely phenetic approaches in basal Angiosperm families (Winteraceae,<br />

Annonaceae, Dilleniaceae) and finally the break-through with the help of DNA-analytical<br />

methods in Rubiaceae-Rubieae, Dipsacaceae, Achillea and Carlina. It is obvious, that the<br />

integration of an increasing number of new technologies has placed “traditional” plant<br />

systematics on a much broader multidisciplinary and scientifically better supported basis. That<br />

certain problems and uncertainties remain in spite of these developments is illustrated by<br />

comparing an earlier monograph on Carlina (1990,1994) with recent DNA-supported research<br />

data. The genus Carlina (Asteraceae, Cardueae) is quite variable in growth form (from treelets to<br />

annuals) and includes ca. 28 species centred in the Mediterranean area and the Canary Islands,<br />

but with considerable extensions into temperate Eurasia. It is most closely related to Chamaeleon<br />

(with 3 Mediterranean species). Nuclear and plastid DNA sequences support the majority of the<br />

earlier conclusions on relationships and historical differentiation based on morphological,<br />

anatomical, karyological, phytochemical, ecological and chorological data. Nevertheless, there<br />

are obvious improvements and new phylogenetic aspects, but also new problems: Extinctions<br />

among basal clades apparently result in the choice of outgroups less suitable for the<br />

reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships and charcter change. Furthermore, accelerated<br />

genetic divergence in apomorphic and relatively young annual taxa may result in the artefact of<br />

their quite basal placement in the phylogenetic trees.<br />

Keywords: plant systematics, historical developments, multidisciplinarity, interpretation<br />

problems of DNA-data, Carlina.<br />

17<br />

29<br />

Oral Lectures

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!