Adil GÜNER, Vehbi ESER - optima
Adil GÜNER, Vehbi ESER - optima
Adil GÜNER, Vehbi ESER - optima
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
LESSONS ON INTEGRATION FROM A HALF-CENTURY OF<br />
CHANGE IN PLANT SYSTEMATICS: CARLINA AND OTHER<br />
EXAMPLES<br />
Friedrich EHRENDORFER<br />
University of Vienna, Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany,<br />
Vienna, Austria: friedrich.ehrendorfer@univie.ac.at<br />
Since the middle of the last century the author has witnessed and was actively involved in the<br />
development of systematic and evolutionary botany from a solid “traditional” basis to what it is<br />
today. This is briefly reviewed with references to karyo- and biosystematic work on Galium,<br />
Asperula and Knautia, extensions into the chemosystematics of Asteraceae-Anthemideae and<br />
Rutaceae, conflicts with purely phenetic approaches in basal Angiosperm families (Winteraceae,<br />
Annonaceae, Dilleniaceae) and finally the break-through with the help of DNA-analytical<br />
methods in Rubiaceae-Rubieae, Dipsacaceae, Achillea and Carlina. It is obvious, that the<br />
integration of an increasing number of new technologies has placed “traditional” plant<br />
systematics on a much broader multidisciplinary and scientifically better supported basis. That<br />
certain problems and uncertainties remain in spite of these developments is illustrated by<br />
comparing an earlier monograph on Carlina (1990,1994) with recent DNA-supported research<br />
data. The genus Carlina (Asteraceae, Cardueae) is quite variable in growth form (from treelets to<br />
annuals) and includes ca. 28 species centred in the Mediterranean area and the Canary Islands,<br />
but with considerable extensions into temperate Eurasia. It is most closely related to Chamaeleon<br />
(with 3 Mediterranean species). Nuclear and plastid DNA sequences support the majority of the<br />
earlier conclusions on relationships and historical differentiation based on morphological,<br />
anatomical, karyological, phytochemical, ecological and chorological data. Nevertheless, there<br />
are obvious improvements and new phylogenetic aspects, but also new problems: Extinctions<br />
among basal clades apparently result in the choice of outgroups less suitable for the<br />
reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships and charcter change. Furthermore, accelerated<br />
genetic divergence in apomorphic and relatively young annual taxa may result in the artefact of<br />
their quite basal placement in the phylogenetic trees.<br />
Keywords: plant systematics, historical developments, multidisciplinarity, interpretation<br />
problems of DNA-data, Carlina.<br />
17<br />
29<br />
Oral Lectures