24.01.2013 Views

Organizational Change for Participatory Irrigation Management

Organizational Change for Participatory Irrigation Management

Organizational Change for Participatory Irrigation Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Surface and groundwater potential is maximum in Ganga basin followed by Brahmaputra.<br />

While resource potential of Brahmaputra is difficult to tap due to geographical conditions,<br />

Ganga basin has good potential <strong>for</strong> expansion and that is why Uttar Pradesh has maximum<br />

irrigated area in the country. Up to now, India has tapped easily exploitable irrigation<br />

potential, and further expansion is difficult. For example, inter-basin transfers etc. may be<br />

necessary, which will require huge financial resources and ef<strong>for</strong>ts.<br />

Another important aspect is that total assessed irrigation potential of India is only 139.89<br />

million ha while cultivated area is 142.215 million ha at present. It indicates that whole of the<br />

cultivated area cannot be irrigated according to present assessment. However, the gross<br />

irrigated area is only 71.510 million ha, which is about 51 percent of the ultimate irrigation<br />

potential leaving about 68.38 million ha. <strong>for</strong> further expansion of irrigation facilities.<br />

Impact of <strong>Irrigation</strong> on Farm Productivity<br />

With the expansion of irrigation facilities in India, use of other agricultural inputs such<br />

as improved and high-yielding varieties of seeds, fertilizes and pesticides etc. had increased<br />

considerably, resulting in considerable increase in farm production and crop productivity. At<br />

the time of independence, the food production was 51 million mt. Now it is about 200 million<br />

mt. Increase in food production with the increase in irrigated area is shown in Table 7. From<br />

Table 7 it is clear that there had been a considerable increase in food production as well as in<br />

average productivity since 1950-51 due to extension of irrigation facilities.<br />

Table 7. Growth in Irrigated Area, Food Production, and Productivity<br />

Year<br />

Irrigated Area<br />

(000 ha)<br />

Total Area<br />

(000 ha)<br />

- 197 -<br />

Production<br />

(000 mt)<br />

Average Yield<br />

(kg/ha)<br />

1950-51 18,317 97,321 50,825 522<br />

1955-56 20,626 110,560 66,850 605<br />

1960-61 22,080 115,581 82,018 710<br />

1965-66 24,032 115,103 72,347 629<br />

1970-71 30,558 124,316 108,422 872<br />

1975-76 34,114 128,181 121,034 944<br />

1980-81 37,614 126,669 129,589 1,023<br />

1981-82 38,448 129,138 133,295 1,032<br />

1982-83 40,206 125,095 129,519 1,035<br />

1983-84 40,115 131,163 152,374 1,162<br />

1984-85 40,628 126,673 145,539 1,149<br />

1985-86 41,675 128,023 150,440 1,175<br />

1986-87 40,484 127,195 143,418 1,128<br />

1987-88 42,909 119,696 140,354 1,173<br />

1988-89 43,671 127,674 169,922 1,331<br />

1989-90 44,526 126,507 170,627 1,349<br />

1990-91 45,459 127,835 176,390 1,380<br />

1991-92 46,283 121,871 168,373 1,382<br />

1992-93 48,259 123,148 179,483 1,457<br />

1993-94 49,900 122,754 184,260 1,501<br />

1994-95 - 123,548 191,093 1,547<br />

1995-96 - 123,437 185,048 1,499<br />

1996-97 - 124,509 199,321 1,601

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!