06.02.2013 Views

2. Behavioral Biology TALKS - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft

2. Behavioral Biology TALKS - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft

2. Behavioral Biology TALKS - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

een conducted to test the function of duets in different species and experimental<br />

evidence suggests that duetting serves a variety of functions. We investigated<br />

duetting in the Crimson-breasted Shrike Laniarius atrococcineus (Malaconotidae).<br />

The focus of our study was on two major functional hypotheses: the joint territorial<br />

defence (Land) and the mate-guarding (Lover) hypothesis. Both hypotheses predict<br />

increased duetting in response to conspecific playback; the critical distinction is in the<br />

relative threat posed by duets and same-sex solo intruders. If duets serve as mateguarding,<br />

signaling of solo same-sex intruders will receive the strongest response,<br />

whereas if territorial defence is the main function, signaling of paired intruders will<br />

receive stronger responses than single intruders. The playback experiments revealed,<br />

that females answered their partner?s song to form duets significantly more often<br />

during female solo playback, suggesting that female duet contributions serve to<br />

guard their males from unpaired females. Males were equally aggressive towards<br />

male solo playback and duet playback, but they produced more solo song during<br />

male solo playback and showed more jamming during duet playback. Solos used in<br />

response to male- solo playback indicate that territorial males may guard their<br />

females from intruding males to prevent them from copulating with their mates.<br />

Males additionally perform territorial defence, mostly through solo song but get<br />

some support from their female who occasionally joins them to perform duets.<br />

Study supported by a grant from the <strong>Deutsche</strong>r Akademischer Austausch Dienst<br />

(DAAD)<br />

�8 Katja Heubel A 704 / 14:15<br />

Bad choosiness? Female competition makes females picky<br />

Author(s): Katja Heubel 1<br />

Affiliation(s): 1 University of Tübingen<br />

Competition among females for access to mating opportunities and its effect on<br />

female mate choice decisions are poorly studied so far. Under natural conditions,<br />

female common gobies (Pomatoschistus microps) often compete for access to mates.<br />

The operational sex ratio is often female-biased and hence availability of nests and<br />

paternal care limited. Female-female competition can be expected to affect female<br />

decisions on mate choice and reproductive effort. With an increasing level of female<br />

competition for access to mates, there is a trade-off between choosing the best male<br />

and missed mating opportunities. I studied the effect of a female-competitive social<br />

environment on female mating decisions for male and nest quality. Female<br />

preferences and mating decisions for male size and nest size were tested either in<br />

presence or absence of competitive females. Surprisingly, females prefer males with<br />

larger nests regardless of the social environment. Preferences for male size, however,<br />

highly depend on the social context.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!