06.02.2013 Views

2. Behavioral Biology TALKS - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft

2. Behavioral Biology TALKS - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft

2. Behavioral Biology TALKS - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

esults imply that instead of using only single electrical ‘snapshots’ of an object, fish<br />

have to make use of temporal modulations of a series of electric images caused by<br />

movement to reliably detect object shape.<br />

����12 Michael Blum<br />

The electric eel economizes on its electric organ discharges, required to paralyze<br />

prey until it is swallowed up<br />

Authors: Michael Blum 1 , Stefan Schuster 1 , Wolfram Schulze 1 , Peter Machnik 1<br />

Affiliation: 1 Department of Animal Physiology, Bayreuth<br />

The electric eel (Electrophorus electricus) is well known for its ability to generate<br />

strong Electric Organ Discharges (EODs) for self-defense and hunting. The electric eel<br />

is an obligate mouth breather and dies when access to water surface is denied.<br />

Accordingly its mouth mucosa is extremely thin and strong supplied with blood, so it<br />

is sensitive and susceptible to injury. To minimize this risk, Electrophorus electricus<br />

paralyzes its prey with strong EODs. It seems reasonable to think that the shocks are<br />

maintained as long as the prey is swallowed up, perhaps as a simple reflex that<br />

generates EODs while prey is in its mouth.<br />

Here we show, that Electrophorus electricus just uses its strong EODs until the prey is<br />

paralyzed, then it switches them off and just restarts pulsing if the prey starts moving<br />

again. So the strong EODs are just used when required.<br />

The obvious benefit of this tactic is that the electric eel is able to conserve energy.<br />

Furthermore there is another advantage. While the prey is getting shocked, its<br />

muscles contract thus fins erect, which could hurt the highly sensitive mouth cavity,<br />

especially if the prey has fin rays. So, its economic discharging behavior also keeps<br />

Electrophorus electricus from worrying about, if prey has fin rays or not.<br />

����13 Sabine Feyl<br />

Orientation in electric fields: More than line-following in electrosensory predators?<br />

Authors: Sabine Feyl 1 , Peter Machnik 1 , Wolfram Schulze 1 , Stefan Schuster 1<br />

Affiliation: 1 Department of Animal Physiology, University of Bayreuth<br />

In contrast to almost all other sensory systems the electrical sense does not seem to<br />

allow easy localisation of the sender. A number of thorough studies have convincingly<br />

shown that territorial electric fish approach discharging conspecifics by following the<br />

current lines and initially without knowing distance and direction to the source of the<br />

discharges.<br />

This strategy is safe but useless when the sender deactivates its discharges and it<br />

requires more time than a direct approach. Both may be important in a hunting<br />

context. According to this we asked if the ability to localise sender position efficiently<br />

is better developed in fish that hunt on the basis of electric signals. Such a situation is<br />

known for the electric eel Electrophorus electricus that preys on the weakly electric<br />

fish Gymnotus carapo. By mimicking the discharges of Gymnotus we analyse if<br />

Electrophorus can take a direct approach to the sender and detect it even when it<br />

goes silent.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!