06.02.2013 Views

2. Behavioral Biology TALKS - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft

2. Behavioral Biology TALKS - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft

2. Behavioral Biology TALKS - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the choice area more often than would be expected by chance. Also, they conducted<br />

more flights and, importantly, harvested more fruits in the dark than in the<br />

illuminated compartment. We conclude that LAN reduces the variety and quantity of<br />

ecosystem services that bats provide, i.e. specifically a reduction of seed dispersal<br />

and probably also of pollination. This might be particularly relevant in the tropics,<br />

where ecosystem services of bats are ecologically important for ecosystem<br />

functioning, and where at the same time the potential for light pollution to increase<br />

is very high.<br />

JG Boyles, PM Cryan, GF McCracken, TH Kunz (2011) Economic importance of bats in agriculture.<br />

Science 332:41-4<strong>2.</strong> SJ Ghanem, CC Voigt (2012) Increasing awareness of ecosystem services provided<br />

by bats. In: HJ Brockmann, TJ Roper, M Naguib, JC. Mitani LW Simmons (eds.) Advances in the study of<br />

behavior 44, Burlington Academic Press, pp. 279-30<strong>2.</strong><br />

7. Ecology POSTERS<br />

����40 Isabelle Flaig<br />

Recruitment behaviour and communication in Partamona orizabaensis<br />

Authors: Isabelle C. Flaig 1 , Ingrid Aguilar 1 , Thomas Schmitt 1 , Stefan Jarau 1<br />

Affiliation: 1 Institute of Experimental Ecology, University of Ulm, Germany<br />

Social insects have evolved communication systems to recruit nest mates to food<br />

sources. Foragers of several stingless bees species deposit pheromone trails on solid<br />

substrates to guide nest mates to food sources. Over fifty years ago, Kerr (1969)<br />

stated that stingless bees of the genus Partamona create aerial odour trails to recruit<br />

workers to resources. He postulated that foragers release pheromones during flight<br />

and lead naïve bees in large groups to food sources. However, experimental proof is<br />

lacking. We studied recruitment behaviour and communication mechanisms in the<br />

species Partamona orizabaensis.<br />

During field experiments, newly recruited bees had to choose between a recruitment<br />

feeder visited by experienced foragers and an unvisited control feeder. The recruits<br />

always preferred the recruitment feeder over the control, indicating that an efficient<br />

recruitment to the known feeding site took place. However, we never observed scent<br />

trail marking between the feeder and the nest.<br />

Additionally, we recorded the bees’ choice behaviour towards feeders baited with<br />

labial- and mandibular gland extracts, potential sources for recruitment pheromones.<br />

The bees did not prefer any of the gland extracts. Rather, mandibular gland<br />

compounds had a clear deterrent effect at feeders.<br />

Chemical analyses revealed that labial gland secretions are predominately composed<br />

of alkenes, whereas mandibular gland secretions contain alcohols and esters. This is<br />

interesting because esters are known to serve as recruitment pheromones in trail<br />

laying species. Whether these compounds are released by Partamona foragers during<br />

flight in order to guide recruits to food sources needs to be clarified in future studies.<br />

Kerr W. E. 1969. Evol. Biol. 3: 119-175<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!