07.02.2013 Views

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2003</strong>0033050 Army Safety Center, Fort Rucker, AL<br />

FLIGHTFAX: Army Aviation Risk-Management Information. <strong>Volume</strong> 30, Number 12<br />

Dec. 2002; <strong>16</strong> pp.; In English; Original contains color illustrations<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A4<strong>10</strong>539; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

No abstract available.<br />

Military Aviation; Aircraft Safety<br />

<strong>2003</strong>0033921 NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />

Evaluation of Trajectory Errors in an Automated Terminal-Area Environment<br />

Oseguera-Lohr, Rosa M.; Williams, David H.; April <strong>2003</strong>; 31 pp.; In English<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): RTOP 722-01-26-21<br />

Report No.(s): NASA/TM-<strong>2003</strong>-212174; NAS 1.15:212174; L-18273; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

A piloted simulation experiment was conducted to document the trajectory errors associated with use of an airplane’s<br />

Flight Management System (FMS) in conjunction with a ground-based ATC automation system, Center-TRACON<br />

Automation System (CTAS) in the terminal area. Three different arrival procedures were compared: current-day (vectors from<br />

ATC), modified (current-day with minor updates), and data link with FMS lateral navigation. Six active airline pilots flew<br />

simulated arrivals in a fixed-base simulator. The FMS-datalink procedure resulted in the smallest time and path distance errors,<br />

indicating that use of this procedure could reduce the CTAS arrival-time prediction error by about half over the current-day<br />

procedure. Significant sources of error contributing to the arrival-time error were crosstrack errors and early speed reduction<br />

in the last 2-4 miles before the final approach fix. Pilot comments were all very positive, indicating the FMS-datalink<br />

procedure was easy to understand and use, and the increased head-down time and workload did not detract from the benefit.<br />

<strong>Issue</strong>s that need to be resolved before this method of operation would be ready for commercial use include development of<br />

procedures acceptable to controllers, better speed conformance monitoring, and FMS database procedures to support the<br />

approach transitions.<br />

Author<br />

Flight Management Systems; Air Traffıc Control; Aircraft Approach Spacing; Aircraft Guidance; Approach Control; Pilot<br />

Support Systems; Navigation Aids<br />

<strong>2003</strong>0033927 Robertson Aviation, LLC, Tempe, AZ, USA<br />

A Study of Transport Airplane Crash-Resistant Fuel Systems<br />

Jones, Lisa, Technical Monitor; Robertson, S. H.; Johnson, N. B.; Hall, D. S.; Rimson, I. J.; March 2002; 240 pp.; In English<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): DTFA03-98-C-000<strong>16</strong>; RTOP 728-50-<strong>10</strong>-01<br />

Report No.(s): NASA/CR-2002-211437; NAS 1.26:211437; DOT/FAA/AR-01/82; RA-00-305-FAA; Copyright; Avail: CASI;<br />

A11, Hardcopy<br />

This report presents the results of a study, funded by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), of transport airplane<br />

crash-resistant fuel system (CRFS). The report covers the historical studies related to aircraft crash fires and fuel containment<br />

concepts undertaken by the FAA, NASA, and the U.S. Army, which ultimately led to the current state of the art in CRFS<br />

technology. It describes the basic research, testing, field investigations and production efforts which have led to the highly<br />

successful military CRFS, which has saved many lives and reduced costs of accidents. Current CRFS technology used in<br />

transport category airplanes is defined and compared to the available state-of-the-art technology. The report provides<br />

information to the FAA and other government organizations which can help them plan their efforts to improve the state of crash<br />

fire protection in the transport airplane fleet. The report provides guidance to designers looking for information about CRFS<br />

design problems, analysis tools to use for product improvement, and a summary of current and proposed regulations for<br />

transport category airplane fuel systems.<br />

Author<br />

Transport Aircraft; Crashworthiness; Aircraft Design; Technology Utilization; Aircraft Fuel Systems<br />

<strong>2003</strong>0033943 NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />

Evaluation of a Dispatcher’s Route Optimization Decision Aid to Avoid Aviation Weather Hazards<br />

Dorneich, Michael C.; Olofinboba, Olu; Pratt, Steve; Osborne, Dannielle; Feyereisen, Thea; Latorella, Kara; April <strong>2003</strong>;<br />

121 pp.; In English<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): RTOP 728-40-<strong>10</strong>-03<br />

Report No.(s): NASA/TM-<strong>2003</strong>-212172; NAS 1.15:212172; L-18271; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A06, Hardcopy<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!