Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003
Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003
Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003
- TAGS
- volume
- 202.118.250.135
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>2003</strong>0034728 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA<br />
The Retrospective Iterated Analysis Scheme for Nonlinear Chaotic Dynamics<br />
Todling, Ricardo; July 11, 2002; 12 pp.; In English; Original contains color illustrations; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03,<br />
Hardcopy<br />
Atmospheric data assimilation is the name scientists give to the techniques of blending atmospheric observations with<br />
atmospheric model results to obtain an accurate idea of what the atmosphere looks like at any given time. Because two pieces<br />
of information are used, observations and model results, the outcomes of data assimilation procedure should be better than<br />
what one would get by using one of these two pieces of information alone. There is a number of different mathematical<br />
techniques that fall under the data assimilation jargon. In theory most these techniques accomplish about the same thing. In<br />
practice, however, slight differences in the approaches amount to faster algorithms in some cases, more economical algorithms<br />
in other cases, and even give better overall results in yet some other cases because of practical uncertainties not accounted for<br />
by theory. Therefore, the key is to find the most adequate data assimilation procedure for the problem in hand. In our Data<br />
Assimilation group we have been doing extensive research to try and find just such data assimilation procedure. One promising<br />
possibility is what we call retrospective iterated analysis (RIA) scheme. This procedure has recently been implemented and<br />
studied in the context of a very large data assimilation system built to help predict and study weather and climate. Although<br />
the results from that study suggest that the RIA scheme produces quite reasonable results, a complete evaluation of the scheme<br />
is very difficult due to the complexity of that problem. The present work steps back a little bit and studies the behavior of the<br />
RIA scheme in the context of a small problem. The problem is small enough to allow full assessment of the quality of the RIA<br />
scheme, but it still has some of the complexity found in nature, namely, its chaotic-type behavior. We find that the RIA<br />
performs very well for this small but still complex problem which is a result that seconds the results of our early studies.<br />
Author<br />
Atmospheric Models; Atmospheric Physics; Climate; Numerical Analysis; Data Processing; Data Reduction; Iterative<br />
Solution<br />
<strong>2003</strong>0036980 California Energy Commission, Sacramento, ICF, Inc., Washington, DC<br />
Inventory of California Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-1999<br />
Birkinshaw, K.; Nov. 2002; In English<br />
Report No.(s): PB<strong>2003</strong>-<strong>10</strong>2668; PUB-600-02-001F; No Copyright; Avail: National Technical Information Service (NTIS)<br />
In September 2000, the California Legislature passed Senate Bill 1771, Senator Sher (Chapter <strong>10</strong>18, Statutes of 2000),<br />
requiring the California Energy Commission (Commission), in consultation with other state agencies, to update California’s<br />
inventory of greenhouse gas emissions in January 2002 and every five years thereafter. The inventory update is to include all<br />
emission sources in the State that were identified in the Commission’s 1998 report, Historical and Forecasted Greenhouse Gas<br />
Emissions Inventories for California. This report, Inventory of California Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-1999,<br />
presents the Commission’s preliminary estimates of emissions and carbon sinks from 1990 to 1999. As Senate Bill 1771<br />
requires, the report includes emissions of greenhouse gases and compares California’s emissions with the emissions from other<br />
states and nations. Limited information was available to allow a complete and thorough analysis and discussion of the impact<br />
of air quality and energy policies and programs on greenhouse gas emissions.<br />
NTIS<br />
Exhaust Emission; Exhaust Gases; Greenhouse Effect; Sinks; California; Inventory Management; Energy Technology;<br />
Climatology<br />
<strong>2003</strong>0036985 Department of Energy, Washington, DC<br />
Report on Broadband Solar Radiometer Inconsistencies at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern<br />
Great Plains (SGP) Central Facility During the ARM Enhanced Shortwave Experiment (ARESE)<br />
Long, C. N.; 1996; 20 pp.<br />
Report No.(s): PB<strong>2003</strong>-<strong>10</strong>2674; ARM-TR-003; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />
Broadband solar radiometer data collected at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Atmospheric Radiation Measurement<br />
(ARM) Southern Great Plains (SGP) Central Facility during the ARM Enhanced Shortwave Experiment (ARESE) exhibits<br />
inconsistencies and inter-calibration offsets. This report examines these problems, and in some cases, suggests error sources<br />
and possible solutions. The data discussed here covers the period from September 28, 1995, through October 30, 1995. Prior<br />
to that, the Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN) radiometer data were not being logged for about 2 and one half<br />
weeks. This problem was not rectified until we inquired about the data for September 27, 1995, in support of an ARESE<br />
analysis. Most of the following discussion is based on 5-minute averages of the data. Site reports state that on October 13,<br />
1995, the BSRN total shortwave (SW) pyranometer was changed to a newly calibrated one; therefore, much of the analysis<br />
140