07.02.2013 Views

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2003</strong>0034728 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA<br />

The Retrospective Iterated Analysis Scheme for Nonlinear Chaotic Dynamics<br />

Todling, Ricardo; July 11, 2002; 12 pp.; In English; Original contains color illustrations; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03,<br />

Hardcopy<br />

Atmospheric data assimilation is the name scientists give to the techniques of blending atmospheric observations with<br />

atmospheric model results to obtain an accurate idea of what the atmosphere looks like at any given time. Because two pieces<br />

of information are used, observations and model results, the outcomes of data assimilation procedure should be better than<br />

what one would get by using one of these two pieces of information alone. There is a number of different mathematical<br />

techniques that fall under the data assimilation jargon. In theory most these techniques accomplish about the same thing. In<br />

practice, however, slight differences in the approaches amount to faster algorithms in some cases, more economical algorithms<br />

in other cases, and even give better overall results in yet some other cases because of practical uncertainties not accounted for<br />

by theory. Therefore, the key is to find the most adequate data assimilation procedure for the problem in hand. In our Data<br />

Assimilation group we have been doing extensive research to try and find just such data assimilation procedure. One promising<br />

possibility is what we call retrospective iterated analysis (RIA) scheme. This procedure has recently been implemented and<br />

studied in the context of a very large data assimilation system built to help predict and study weather and climate. Although<br />

the results from that study suggest that the RIA scheme produces quite reasonable results, a complete evaluation of the scheme<br />

is very difficult due to the complexity of that problem. The present work steps back a little bit and studies the behavior of the<br />

RIA scheme in the context of a small problem. The problem is small enough to allow full assessment of the quality of the RIA<br />

scheme, but it still has some of the complexity found in nature, namely, its chaotic-type behavior. We find that the RIA<br />

performs very well for this small but still complex problem which is a result that seconds the results of our early studies.<br />

Author<br />

Atmospheric Models; Atmospheric Physics; Climate; Numerical Analysis; Data Processing; Data Reduction; Iterative<br />

Solution<br />

<strong>2003</strong>0036980 California Energy Commission, Sacramento, ICF, Inc., Washington, DC<br />

Inventory of California Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-1999<br />

Birkinshaw, K.; Nov. 2002; In English<br />

Report No.(s): PB<strong>2003</strong>-<strong>10</strong>2668; PUB-600-02-001F; No Copyright; Avail: National Technical Information Service (NTIS)<br />

In September 2000, the California Legislature passed Senate Bill 1771, Senator Sher (Chapter <strong>10</strong>18, Statutes of 2000),<br />

requiring the California Energy Commission (Commission), in consultation with other state agencies, to update California’s<br />

inventory of greenhouse gas emissions in January 2002 and every five years thereafter. The inventory update is to include all<br />

emission sources in the State that were identified in the Commission’s 1998 report, Historical and Forecasted Greenhouse Gas<br />

Emissions Inventories for California. This report, Inventory of California Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-1999,<br />

presents the Commission’s preliminary estimates of emissions and carbon sinks from 1990 to 1999. As Senate Bill 1771<br />

requires, the report includes emissions of greenhouse gases and compares California’s emissions with the emissions from other<br />

states and nations. Limited information was available to allow a complete and thorough analysis and discussion of the impact<br />

of air quality and energy policies and programs on greenhouse gas emissions.<br />

NTIS<br />

Exhaust Emission; Exhaust Gases; Greenhouse Effect; Sinks; California; Inventory Management; Energy Technology;<br />

Climatology<br />

<strong>2003</strong>0036985 Department of Energy, Washington, DC<br />

Report on Broadband Solar Radiometer Inconsistencies at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern<br />

Great Plains (SGP) Central Facility During the ARM Enhanced Shortwave Experiment (ARESE)<br />

Long, C. N.; 1996; 20 pp.<br />

Report No.(s): PB<strong>2003</strong>-<strong>10</strong>2674; ARM-TR-003; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Broadband solar radiometer data collected at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Atmospheric Radiation Measurement<br />

(ARM) Southern Great Plains (SGP) Central Facility during the ARM Enhanced Shortwave Experiment (ARESE) exhibits<br />

inconsistencies and inter-calibration offsets. This report examines these problems, and in some cases, suggests error sources<br />

and possible solutions. The data discussed here covers the period from September 28, 1995, through October 30, 1995. Prior<br />

to that, the Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN) radiometer data were not being logged for about 2 and one half<br />

weeks. This problem was not rectified until we inquired about the data for September 27, 1995, in support of an ARESE<br />

analysis. Most of the following discussion is based on 5-minute averages of the data. Site reports state that on October 13,<br />

1995, the BSRN total shortwave (SW) pyranometer was changed to a newly calibrated one; therefore, much of the analysis<br />

140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!