07.02.2013 Views

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2003</strong>0032<strong>41</strong>7 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA<br />

Gyrophase-bunched Electrons: Cluster Observations and Simulations<br />

Gurgiolo, C.; Vinas, A. F.; Goldstein, Melvyn L.; [<strong>2003</strong>]; 1 pp.; In English; Yosemite <strong>2003</strong> Conference, <strong>2003</strong>, CA, USA;<br />

Copyright; Avail: Other Sources; Abstract Only<br />

The interaction of the solar wind with the Earth’s bow shock is responsible for a number of phenomena both upstream<br />

and downstream. One of the least understood and studied of these is the generation of gyrophase-bunched electrons. We will<br />

describe initial work searching for and analyzing such events in (Plasma Electron And Current Experiment (PEACE) data from<br />

CLUSTER. Plasma simulations will complement the data analysis. Recent analyses suggest that gyrophase-bunched electrons<br />

are present rather frequently in the upstream region, due either to energization in the reflection off the shock front or, more<br />

likely, to phase trapping in locally produced whistler wave fields.<br />

Author<br />

Solar Wind; Electrons; Shock Waves; Electron Plasma; Simulation<br />

<strong>2003</strong>0032480 NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />

Comparison of Stratus Cloud Properties Deduced from Surface, GOES, and Aircraft Data during the March 2000<br />

ARM Cloud IOP<br />

Minnis, Patrick; Smith, William L., Jr.; Dong, Xiquan; Mace, Gerald G.; Poellot, Michael; Marchand, Roger T.; Rapp, Anita<br />

D.; Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences; December 2002; 59, 23, pp. 3265-3284; In English; Original contains color<br />

illustrations; Copyright; Avail: Other Sources<br />

Low-level stratus cloud microphysical properties derived from surface and Geostationary Operational Environmental<br />

Satellite (GOES) data during the March 2000 cloud intensive observational period (IOP) at the Atmospheric Radiation<br />

Measurement (ARM) program Southern Great Plains (SGP) site are compared with aircraft in situ measurements. For the<br />

surface retrievals, the cloud droplet effective radius and optical depth are retrieved from a delta2-stream radiative transfer<br />

model with the input of ground-based measurements, and the cloud liquid water path (LWP) is retrieved from ground-based<br />

microwave-radiometer-measured brightness temperature. The satellite results, retrieved from GOES visible, solar-infrared,<br />

and infrared radiances, are averaged in a 0.5 deg x 0.5 deg box centered on the ARM SGP site. The forward scattering<br />

spectrometer probe (FSSP) on the University of North Dakota Citation aircraft provided in situ measurements of the cloud<br />

microphysical properties. During the IOP, four low-level stratus cases were intensively observed by the ground- and<br />

satellite-based remote sensors and aircraft in situ instruments resulting in a total of <strong>10</strong> h of simultaneous data from the three<br />

platforms. In spite of the large differences in temporal and spatial resolution between surface, GOES, and aircraft, the surface<br />

retrievals have excellent agreement with the aircraft data overall for the entire <strong>10</strong>-h period, and the GOES results agree<br />

reasonably well with the surface and aircraft data and have similar trends and magnitudes except for the GOES-derived<br />

effective radii, which are typically larger than the surface- and aircraft-derived values. The means and standard deviations of<br />

the differences between the surface and aircraft effective radius, LWP, and optical depth are -4\% +/- 20.1\%, -1\% +/- 31.2\%,<br />

and 8\% l+/- 29.395, respectively: while their correlation coefficients are 0.78, 0.92, and 0.89, respectively, during the <strong>10</strong>-h<br />

period. The differences and correlations between the GOES-8 and aircraft results are of a similar magnitude, except for the<br />

droplet sizes. The averaged GOES-derived effective radius is 23\% or 1.8 microns greater than the corresponding aircraft<br />

values. resulting in a much smaller correlation coefficient of 0.18. Additional surface-satellite datasets were analyzed for time<br />

periods when the aircraft was unavailable. When these additional results are combined with the retrievals from the four in situ<br />

cases, the means and standard deviations of the differences between the satellite-derived cloud droplet effective radius, LWP,<br />

and optical depth and their surface-based counterparts are <strong>16</strong>\% +/- 31.2\%, 4\% +/- 31.6\%, and -6\% +/- 39.9\%, respectively.<br />

The corresponding correlation coefficients are 0.24, 0.88, and 0.73. The frequency distributions of the two datasets are very<br />

similar indicating that the satellite retrieval method should be able to produce reliable statistics of boundary layer cloud<br />

properties for use in climate and cloud process models.<br />

Author<br />

Cloud Physics; Radiation Measurement; Atmospheric Radiation; Radiative Transfer; Particle Size Distribution; Infrared<br />

Radiation; Water<br />

<strong>2003</strong>0032987 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA<br />

A New Estimate of the Extragalactic Gamma-ray Background from EGRET Data<br />

Moskalenko, I. V.; Strong, A.; Reimer, O.; March 12, <strong>2003</strong>; 1 pp.; In English; 28th ICRC Meeting, 31 Jul - 7 Aug. <strong>2003</strong>,<br />

Japan; Copyright; Avail: Other Sources; Abstract Only<br />

We use the GALPROP model for cosmic-ray propagation to obtain our best prediction of the Galactic component of<br />

gamma rays, and show that away from the Galactic plane it gives an accurate prediction of the observed Energetic Gamma<br />

2<strong>41</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!