Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003
Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003
Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003
- TAGS
- volume
- 202.118.250.135
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>2003</strong>0032<strong>41</strong>7 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA<br />
Gyrophase-bunched Electrons: Cluster Observations and Simulations<br />
Gurgiolo, C.; Vinas, A. F.; Goldstein, Melvyn L.; [<strong>2003</strong>]; 1 pp.; In English; Yosemite <strong>2003</strong> Conference, <strong>2003</strong>, CA, USA;<br />
Copyright; Avail: Other Sources; Abstract Only<br />
The interaction of the solar wind with the Earth’s bow shock is responsible for a number of phenomena both upstream<br />
and downstream. One of the least understood and studied of these is the generation of gyrophase-bunched electrons. We will<br />
describe initial work searching for and analyzing such events in (Plasma Electron And Current Experiment (PEACE) data from<br />
CLUSTER. Plasma simulations will complement the data analysis. Recent analyses suggest that gyrophase-bunched electrons<br />
are present rather frequently in the upstream region, due either to energization in the reflection off the shock front or, more<br />
likely, to phase trapping in locally produced whistler wave fields.<br />
Author<br />
Solar Wind; Electrons; Shock Waves; Electron Plasma; Simulation<br />
<strong>2003</strong>0032480 NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />
Comparison of Stratus Cloud Properties Deduced from Surface, GOES, and Aircraft Data during the March 2000<br />
ARM Cloud IOP<br />
Minnis, Patrick; Smith, William L., Jr.; Dong, Xiquan; Mace, Gerald G.; Poellot, Michael; Marchand, Roger T.; Rapp, Anita<br />
D.; Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences; December 2002; 59, 23, pp. 3265-3284; In English; Original contains color<br />
illustrations; Copyright; Avail: Other Sources<br />
Low-level stratus cloud microphysical properties derived from surface and Geostationary Operational Environmental<br />
Satellite (GOES) data during the March 2000 cloud intensive observational period (IOP) at the Atmospheric Radiation<br />
Measurement (ARM) program Southern Great Plains (SGP) site are compared with aircraft in situ measurements. For the<br />
surface retrievals, the cloud droplet effective radius and optical depth are retrieved from a delta2-stream radiative transfer<br />
model with the input of ground-based measurements, and the cloud liquid water path (LWP) is retrieved from ground-based<br />
microwave-radiometer-measured brightness temperature. The satellite results, retrieved from GOES visible, solar-infrared,<br />
and infrared radiances, are averaged in a 0.5 deg x 0.5 deg box centered on the ARM SGP site. The forward scattering<br />
spectrometer probe (FSSP) on the University of North Dakota Citation aircraft provided in situ measurements of the cloud<br />
microphysical properties. During the IOP, four low-level stratus cases were intensively observed by the ground- and<br />
satellite-based remote sensors and aircraft in situ instruments resulting in a total of <strong>10</strong> h of simultaneous data from the three<br />
platforms. In spite of the large differences in temporal and spatial resolution between surface, GOES, and aircraft, the surface<br />
retrievals have excellent agreement with the aircraft data overall for the entire <strong>10</strong>-h period, and the GOES results agree<br />
reasonably well with the surface and aircraft data and have similar trends and magnitudes except for the GOES-derived<br />
effective radii, which are typically larger than the surface- and aircraft-derived values. The means and standard deviations of<br />
the differences between the surface and aircraft effective radius, LWP, and optical depth are -4\% +/- 20.1\%, -1\% +/- 31.2\%,<br />
and 8\% l+/- 29.395, respectively: while their correlation coefficients are 0.78, 0.92, and 0.89, respectively, during the <strong>10</strong>-h<br />
period. The differences and correlations between the GOES-8 and aircraft results are of a similar magnitude, except for the<br />
droplet sizes. The averaged GOES-derived effective radius is 23\% or 1.8 microns greater than the corresponding aircraft<br />
values. resulting in a much smaller correlation coefficient of 0.18. Additional surface-satellite datasets were analyzed for time<br />
periods when the aircraft was unavailable. When these additional results are combined with the retrievals from the four in situ<br />
cases, the means and standard deviations of the differences between the satellite-derived cloud droplet effective radius, LWP,<br />
and optical depth and their surface-based counterparts are <strong>16</strong>\% +/- 31.2\%, 4\% +/- 31.6\%, and -6\% +/- 39.9\%, respectively.<br />
The corresponding correlation coefficients are 0.24, 0.88, and 0.73. The frequency distributions of the two datasets are very<br />
similar indicating that the satellite retrieval method should be able to produce reliable statistics of boundary layer cloud<br />
properties for use in climate and cloud process models.<br />
Author<br />
Cloud Physics; Radiation Measurement; Atmospheric Radiation; Radiative Transfer; Particle Size Distribution; Infrared<br />
Radiation; Water<br />
<strong>2003</strong>0032987 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA<br />
A New Estimate of the Extragalactic Gamma-ray Background from EGRET Data<br />
Moskalenko, I. V.; Strong, A.; Reimer, O.; March 12, <strong>2003</strong>; 1 pp.; In English; 28th ICRC Meeting, 31 Jul - 7 Aug. <strong>2003</strong>,<br />
Japan; Copyright; Avail: Other Sources; Abstract Only<br />
We use the GALPROP model for cosmic-ray propagation to obtain our best prediction of the Galactic component of<br />
gamma rays, and show that away from the Galactic plane it gives an accurate prediction of the observed Energetic Gamma<br />
2<strong>41</strong>