07.02.2013 Views

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2003</strong>0036993 Pacific Northwest National Lab., Richland, WA<br />

Best Estimate Radiation Flux Value Added Product: Algorithm Operational Details and Explanations<br />

Shi, Y.; Long, C. N.; Oct. 2002; In English<br />

Report No.(s): PB<strong>2003</strong>-<strong>10</strong>2677; ARM-TR-008; No Copyright; Avail: National Technical Information Service (NTIS)<br />

This document describes some specifics of the algorithm for best estimate evaluation of radiation fluxes at Southern Great<br />

Plains (SGP) Central Facility (CF). It uses the data available from the three co-located surface radiometer platforms at the SGP<br />

CF to automatically determine the best estimate of the irradiance measurements available. The Best Estimate Flux (BEFlux)<br />

value added product (VAP) was previously named Best Estimate ShortWave (BESW) VAP, which included all of the<br />

broadband and spectral shortwave (SW) measurements for the SGP CF. In BESW, multiple measurements of the same<br />

quantities, were handled simply by designating one as the primary measurement and using all others to merely fill in any gaps.<br />

Thus, this BESW is better termed most continuous, since no additional quality assessment was applied. We modified the<br />

algorithm in BESW to use the average of the closest two measurements as the best estimate when possible, if these<br />

measurements pass all quality assessment criteria.<br />

NTIS<br />

Algorithms; Remote Sensing; Radiometers; Climatology; Heat Flux; Short Wave Radiation<br />

<strong>2003</strong>0036996 Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY, Pacific Northwest National<br />

Lab., Richland, WA<br />

ARM Millimeter Wave Cloud Radars (MMCRs) and the Active Remote Sensing of Clouds (ARSCL) Value Added<br />

Product (VAP)<br />

Clothiaux, E. E.; Miller, M. A.; Perez, R. C.; Turner, D. D.; Moran, K. P.; Mar. 04, 2001; 60 pp.; In English<br />

Report No.(s): PB<strong>2003</strong>-<strong>10</strong>2678; DOE/TM-ARM-VAP-002-1; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A04, Hardcopy<br />

The Millimeter Wave Cloud Radars (MMCRs) are designed as a remote sensing tool that can accurately detect almost all<br />

of the hydrometeors present in the atmosphere. To illustrate the difficulty of this task, the various types of hydrometeors that<br />

can occur in the atmosphere are considered in the context of detection by the MMCRs. Having outlined the nature of the<br />

remote sensing problem, a discussion ensues of the NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory (ETL) design of the<br />

MMCR. Next, we present the operational modes of the MMCRs and discuss them in some detail to illustrate the nature of<br />

the cloud products that are, and will be, derived from the MMCRs on a continuous basis.<br />

NTIS<br />

Remote Sensing; Clouds (Meteorology)<br />

<strong>2003</strong>0037179 Lawrence Livermore National Lab., Livermore, CA<br />

Intercomparison of Climate Data Sets as a Measure of Observational Uncertainty<br />

Feb. 22, 2002; In English<br />

Report No.(s): DE2002-15002142; UCRL-ID-147371; No Copyright; Avail: National Technical Information Service (NTIS)<br />

Uncertainties in climate observations are revealed when alternate observationally based data sets are compared. General<br />

circulation model-based ‘reanalyses’ of meteorological observations will yield different results from different models, even if<br />

identical sets of raw unanalyzed data form their starting points. We have examined 25 longitude-latitude fields (including<br />

selected levels for three-dimensional quantities) encompassing atmospheric climate variables for which the PCMDI<br />

observational data base contains two or more high-quality sources. For the most part we compare ECMWF with NCEP<br />

reanalysis. In some cases, we compare in situ and/or satellite-derived data with reanalysis. To obtain an overview of the<br />

differences for all 25 fields, we use a graphical technique developed for climate model diagnosis: a ‘portrait diagram’<br />

displaying root-mean-square differences between the alternate data sources. With a few exceptions (arising from the<br />

requirement that RMS differences be normalized to accommodate different units of variables) the portrait diagrams indicate<br />

areas of agreement and disagreement that can be confirmed by examining traditional graphics such as zonal mean plots. In<br />

accord with conventional wisdom, the greatest agreement between alternate data sets - hence the smallest implied<br />

observational uncertainty - occurs for upper tropospheric zonal wind. We also find fairly good agreement between reanalysis<br />

and more direct measures of precipitation, suggesting that modern observational systems are resolving some longstanding<br />

problems with its measurement.<br />

NTIS<br />

Climate Models; Data Processing<br />

142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!