Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003
Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003
Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003
- TAGS
- volume
- 202.118.250.135
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>2003</strong>0036993 Pacific Northwest National Lab., Richland, WA<br />
Best Estimate Radiation Flux Value Added Product: Algorithm Operational Details and Explanations<br />
Shi, Y.; Long, C. N.; Oct. 2002; In English<br />
Report No.(s): PB<strong>2003</strong>-<strong>10</strong>2677; ARM-TR-008; No Copyright; Avail: National Technical Information Service (NTIS)<br />
This document describes some specifics of the algorithm for best estimate evaluation of radiation fluxes at Southern Great<br />
Plains (SGP) Central Facility (CF). It uses the data available from the three co-located surface radiometer platforms at the SGP<br />
CF to automatically determine the best estimate of the irradiance measurements available. The Best Estimate Flux (BEFlux)<br />
value added product (VAP) was previously named Best Estimate ShortWave (BESW) VAP, which included all of the<br />
broadband and spectral shortwave (SW) measurements for the SGP CF. In BESW, multiple measurements of the same<br />
quantities, were handled simply by designating one as the primary measurement and using all others to merely fill in any gaps.<br />
Thus, this BESW is better termed most continuous, since no additional quality assessment was applied. We modified the<br />
algorithm in BESW to use the average of the closest two measurements as the best estimate when possible, if these<br />
measurements pass all quality assessment criteria.<br />
NTIS<br />
Algorithms; Remote Sensing; Radiometers; Climatology; Heat Flux; Short Wave Radiation<br />
<strong>2003</strong>0036996 Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY, Pacific Northwest National<br />
Lab., Richland, WA<br />
ARM Millimeter Wave Cloud Radars (MMCRs) and the Active Remote Sensing of Clouds (ARSCL) Value Added<br />
Product (VAP)<br />
Clothiaux, E. E.; Miller, M. A.; Perez, R. C.; Turner, D. D.; Moran, K. P.; Mar. 04, 2001; 60 pp.; In English<br />
Report No.(s): PB<strong>2003</strong>-<strong>10</strong>2678; DOE/TM-ARM-VAP-002-1; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A04, Hardcopy<br />
The Millimeter Wave Cloud Radars (MMCRs) are designed as a remote sensing tool that can accurately detect almost all<br />
of the hydrometeors present in the atmosphere. To illustrate the difficulty of this task, the various types of hydrometeors that<br />
can occur in the atmosphere are considered in the context of detection by the MMCRs. Having outlined the nature of the<br />
remote sensing problem, a discussion ensues of the NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory (ETL) design of the<br />
MMCR. Next, we present the operational modes of the MMCRs and discuss them in some detail to illustrate the nature of<br />
the cloud products that are, and will be, derived from the MMCRs on a continuous basis.<br />
NTIS<br />
Remote Sensing; Clouds (Meteorology)<br />
<strong>2003</strong>0037179 Lawrence Livermore National Lab., Livermore, CA<br />
Intercomparison of Climate Data Sets as a Measure of Observational Uncertainty<br />
Feb. 22, 2002; In English<br />
Report No.(s): DE2002-15002142; UCRL-ID-147371; No Copyright; Avail: National Technical Information Service (NTIS)<br />
Uncertainties in climate observations are revealed when alternate observationally based data sets are compared. General<br />
circulation model-based ‘reanalyses’ of meteorological observations will yield different results from different models, even if<br />
identical sets of raw unanalyzed data form their starting points. We have examined 25 longitude-latitude fields (including<br />
selected levels for three-dimensional quantities) encompassing atmospheric climate variables for which the PCMDI<br />
observational data base contains two or more high-quality sources. For the most part we compare ECMWF with NCEP<br />
reanalysis. In some cases, we compare in situ and/or satellite-derived data with reanalysis. To obtain an overview of the<br />
differences for all 25 fields, we use a graphical technique developed for climate model diagnosis: a ‘portrait diagram’<br />
displaying root-mean-square differences between the alternate data sources. With a few exceptions (arising from the<br />
requirement that RMS differences be normalized to accommodate different units of variables) the portrait diagrams indicate<br />
areas of agreement and disagreement that can be confirmed by examining traditional graphics such as zonal mean plots. In<br />
accord with conventional wisdom, the greatest agreement between alternate data sets - hence the smallest implied<br />
observational uncertainty - occurs for upper tropospheric zonal wind. We also find fairly good agreement between reanalysis<br />
and more direct measures of precipitation, suggesting that modern observational systems are resolving some longstanding<br />
problems with its measurement.<br />
NTIS<br />
Climate Models; Data Processing<br />
142