07.02.2013 Views

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2003</strong>0034731 Nevada Univ., Las Vegas, NV<br />

Analysis of Two Methods of Isometric Muscle Contractions During the Anti-G Straining Maneuver<br />

Annicelli, Lance L.; <strong>May</strong> <strong>2003</strong>; 85 pp.; In English<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A4<strong>10</strong>693; UNLV-CI02-836; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A05, Hardcopy<br />

This study investigated the difference in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and Cardiac Output (CO) between two methods<br />

of isometric muscle contractions during the Anti-G Straining Maneuver (AGSM). 12 subjects (ages 18 to 38 years, height<br />

176.8 plus or minus 7.4 cm, body mass 78.8 plus or minus 15.6 kg, percent body fat 14.3 plus or minus 6.6\%) participated<br />

in the study. The study was a one-way within-subject design with test conditions counterbalanced. Two methods of isometric<br />

muscle contractions lasting 30 seconds each were assessed; an isometric push contraction and an isometric muscle tensing<br />

contraction. The dependent parameters were MAP and CO. The average MAP during the push contraction was 123 mmHg,<br />

SD plus or minus 11 and for tense was 118 mmHg, SD plus or minus 8. CO was 7.6 L/min, SD plus or minus 1.6 for push<br />

and 7.9 L/min SD plus or minus 2.0 for tense method. Dependent t-tests revealed t(11) = 1.517, p=0.157forMAPandt(11)<br />

= 0.875, p = 0.400 for CO. This study demonstrated that the two methods of isometric muscle contractions were not<br />

statistically different with regards to MAP and CO. Therefore, both forms of isometric contractions may be potentially useful<br />

when performing the muscle contraction portion of the AGSM.<br />

DTIC<br />

Heart Rate; Exercise Physiology; Stress (Biology)<br />

53<br />

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES<br />

Includes psychological factors; individual and group behavior; crew training and evaluation; and psychiatric research.<br />

<strong>2003</strong>0032427 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA<br />

Biologically Inspired Behavioral Strategies for Autonomous Aerial Explorers on Mars<br />

Plice, Laura; Pisanich, Greg; Lau, Benton; Young, Larry A.; December 09, 2002; <strong>16</strong> pp.; In English; IEEE <strong>2003</strong> Aerospace<br />

Conference, 8-15 Mar. <strong>2003</strong>, Big Sky, MT, USA; Original document is crooked and contains black and white illustrations<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): NAS2-00065; RTOP 712-92-43; RTOP 749-50-00; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

The natural world is a rich source of problem- solving approaches. This paper discusses the feasibility and technical<br />

challenges underlying mimicking, or analogously adapting, biological behavioral strategies to mission/flight planning for<br />

aerial vehicles engaged in planetary exploration. Two candidate concepts based on natural resource utilization and searching<br />

behaviors are adapted io technological applications. Prototypes and test missions addressing the difficulties of implementation<br />

and their solutions are also described.<br />

Author<br />

Autonomy; Mars (Planet); Activity (Biology); Aerial Photography<br />

54<br />

MAN/SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY AND LIFE SUPPORT<br />

Includes human factors engineering, bionics, man-machine systems, life support, space suits and protective clothing. For related<br />

information see also <strong>16</strong> Space Transportation and Safety and 52 Aerospace Medicine.<br />

<strong>2003</strong>0032422 NASA Kennedy Space Center, Cocoa Beach, FL, USA, Dynamac Corp., Cocoa Beach, FL, USA<br />

Crop Production for Advanced Life Support Systems - Observations From the Kennedy Space Center Breadboard<br />

Project<br />

Wheeler, R. M.; Sager, J. C.; Prince, R. P.; Knott, W. M.; Mackowiak, C. L.; Stutte, G. W.; Yorio, N. C.; Ruffe, L. M.; Peterson,<br />

B. V.; Goins, G. D.; February <strong>2003</strong>; 69 pp.; In English; Original contains black and white illustrations<br />

Report No.(s): NASA/TM-<strong>2003</strong>-211184; NAS 1.15:211184; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A04, Hardcopy<br />

The use of plants for bioregenerative life support for space missions was first studied by the US Air Force in the 1950s<br />

and 1960s. Extensive testing was also conducted from the 1960s through the 1980s by Russian researchers located at the<br />

Institute of Biophysics in Krasnoyarsk, Siberia, and the Institute for Biomedical Problems in Moscow. NASA initiated<br />

bioregenerative research in the 1960s (e.g., Hydrogenomonas) but this research did not include testing with plants until about<br />

1980, with the start of the Controlled Ecological Life Support System (CELSS) Program. The NASA CELSS research was<br />

carried out at universities, private corporations, and NASA field centers, including Kennedy Space Center (KSC). The project<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!