Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003
Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003
Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003
- TAGS
- volume
- 202.118.250.135
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>2003</strong>0034731 Nevada Univ., Las Vegas, NV<br />
Analysis of Two Methods of Isometric Muscle Contractions During the Anti-G Straining Maneuver<br />
Annicelli, Lance L.; <strong>May</strong> <strong>2003</strong>; 85 pp.; In English<br />
Report No.(s): AD-A4<strong>10</strong>693; UNLV-CI02-836; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A05, Hardcopy<br />
This study investigated the difference in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and Cardiac Output (CO) between two methods<br />
of isometric muscle contractions during the Anti-G Straining Maneuver (AGSM). 12 subjects (ages 18 to 38 years, height<br />
176.8 plus or minus 7.4 cm, body mass 78.8 plus or minus 15.6 kg, percent body fat 14.3 plus or minus 6.6\%) participated<br />
in the study. The study was a one-way within-subject design with test conditions counterbalanced. Two methods of isometric<br />
muscle contractions lasting 30 seconds each were assessed; an isometric push contraction and an isometric muscle tensing<br />
contraction. The dependent parameters were MAP and CO. The average MAP during the push contraction was 123 mmHg,<br />
SD plus or minus 11 and for tense was 118 mmHg, SD plus or minus 8. CO was 7.6 L/min, SD plus or minus 1.6 for push<br />
and 7.9 L/min SD plus or minus 2.0 for tense method. Dependent t-tests revealed t(11) = 1.517, p=0.157forMAPandt(11)<br />
= 0.875, p = 0.400 for CO. This study demonstrated that the two methods of isometric muscle contractions were not<br />
statistically different with regards to MAP and CO. Therefore, both forms of isometric contractions may be potentially useful<br />
when performing the muscle contraction portion of the AGSM.<br />
DTIC<br />
Heart Rate; Exercise Physiology; Stress (Biology)<br />
53<br />
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES<br />
Includes psychological factors; individual and group behavior; crew training and evaluation; and psychiatric research.<br />
<strong>2003</strong>0032427 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA<br />
Biologically Inspired Behavioral Strategies for Autonomous Aerial Explorers on Mars<br />
Plice, Laura; Pisanich, Greg; Lau, Benton; Young, Larry A.; December 09, 2002; <strong>16</strong> pp.; In English; IEEE <strong>2003</strong> Aerospace<br />
Conference, 8-15 Mar. <strong>2003</strong>, Big Sky, MT, USA; Original document is crooked and contains black and white illustrations<br />
Contract(s)/Grant(s): NAS2-00065; RTOP 712-92-43; RTOP 749-50-00; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />
The natural world is a rich source of problem- solving approaches. This paper discusses the feasibility and technical<br />
challenges underlying mimicking, or analogously adapting, biological behavioral strategies to mission/flight planning for<br />
aerial vehicles engaged in planetary exploration. Two candidate concepts based on natural resource utilization and searching<br />
behaviors are adapted io technological applications. Prototypes and test missions addressing the difficulties of implementation<br />
and their solutions are also described.<br />
Author<br />
Autonomy; Mars (Planet); Activity (Biology); Aerial Photography<br />
54<br />
MAN/SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY AND LIFE SUPPORT<br />
Includes human factors engineering, bionics, man-machine systems, life support, space suits and protective clothing. For related<br />
information see also <strong>16</strong> Space Transportation and Safety and 52 Aerospace Medicine.<br />
<strong>2003</strong>0032422 NASA Kennedy Space Center, Cocoa Beach, FL, USA, Dynamac Corp., Cocoa Beach, FL, USA<br />
Crop Production for Advanced Life Support Systems - Observations From the Kennedy Space Center Breadboard<br />
Project<br />
Wheeler, R. M.; Sager, J. C.; Prince, R. P.; Knott, W. M.; Mackowiak, C. L.; Stutte, G. W.; Yorio, N. C.; Ruffe, L. M.; Peterson,<br />
B. V.; Goins, G. D.; February <strong>2003</strong>; 69 pp.; In English; Original contains black and white illustrations<br />
Report No.(s): NASA/TM-<strong>2003</strong>-211184; NAS 1.15:211184; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A04, Hardcopy<br />
The use of plants for bioregenerative life support for space missions was first studied by the US Air Force in the 1950s<br />
and 1960s. Extensive testing was also conducted from the 1960s through the 1980s by Russian researchers located at the<br />
Institute of Biophysics in Krasnoyarsk, Siberia, and the Institute for Biomedical Problems in Moscow. NASA initiated<br />
bioregenerative research in the 1960s (e.g., Hydrogenomonas) but this research did not include testing with plants until about<br />
1980, with the start of the Controlled Ecological Life Support System (CELSS) Program. The NASA CELSS research was<br />
carried out at universities, private corporations, and NASA field centers, including Kennedy Space Center (KSC). The project<br />
151