07.02.2013 Views

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2003</strong>0038797 Lawrence Livermore National Lab., Livermore, CA<br />

Whither Deterrence. A Brief Synopsis<br />

Poppe, C.; Vergino, E.; Barker, B.; Brown, P.; Gilmartin, T. J.; <strong>May</strong> 29, 2002; 20 pp.<br />

Report No.(s): DE2002-15002153; UCRL-ID-148557; No Copyright; Avail: Department of Energy Information Bridge<br />

To most audiences, deterrence has been interconnected with nuclear weapons whose purpose had been to deter a Soviet<br />

attack. But, the Soviet Union has been gone for almost a decade. President George W. Bush has stated that Russia is not an<br />

enemy of the USA and the numbers of nuclear weapons can be dramatically reduced. It is important to note that deterrence<br />

has always transcended nuclear weapons. The USA first line of deterrence has been its formidable conventional warfare<br />

capability, designed to prevent conflict and win wars if necessary. The role of nuclear weapons has been to deter the use of<br />

nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction against U.S. interests during the conduct of conventional warfare and<br />

to ensure our ability to inflict massive destruction on any who would use nuclear weapons, or other weapons of mass<br />

destruction, against us. With regard to the Soviet Union, the threat of the use of nuclear weapons was a critical component<br />

of our deterrent to prevent massive Soviet conventional attack against our allies in Europe.<br />

NTIS<br />

Nuclear Weapons; Military Operations; Strategy<br />

<strong>2003</strong>0038803 Lawrence Livermore National Lab., Livermore, CA<br />

WSSX-A Joint U.S.-Russian Nuclear Counter-Terrorism Exchange<br />

Crites, T. R.; Sep. 25, 2002; 12 pp.<br />

Report No.(s): DE2002-15002158; UCRL-JC-149057; No Copyright; Avail: Department of Energy Information Bridge<br />

In 1994, the U. S. and Russian Federation governments formally agreed to exchange information on the safety and<br />

security of nuclear weapons. This agreement included three major elements, called Technical Working Groups (TWGs). TWG<br />

C deals with counter-terrorism. Its four assigned actions and U.S./Russian experience are reviewed in this paper. Although<br />

active exchange programs were created under TWGs A and B, involving workshops and laboratory-to-laboratory development<br />

projects, little work was initiated in TWG C, due to the sensitive nature of this information. After 9/11, however, it became<br />

clear that much could be gained by having each country share information to help solve the problem of nuclear proliferation<br />

among terrorist groups. Government-to-government meetings have reaffirmed the initial agreement to exchange information<br />

on this topic, and a number of joint project proposals are now under discussion. The Joint Steering Committee that oversees<br />

this exchange has approved approximately 20 projects. They include such topics as terrorist threat scenario development,<br />

detection of nuclear material and explosives in transportation containers, analysis of material mass and configuration, and<br />

consequence mitigation. It is expected that the joint development of these capabilities will enhance our ability to respond to<br />

a nuclear threat and to facilitate mutual assistance, should either party experience a nuclear terrorist event.<br />

NTIS<br />

United States; Russian Federation; International Cooperation; Terrorism; Nuclear Weapons<br />

85<br />

TECHNOLOGY UTILIZATION AND SURFACE TRANSPORTATION<br />

Includes aerospace technology transfer; urban technology; surface and mass transportation. For related information see also 03 Air<br />

Transportation and Safety, <strong>16</strong> Space Transportation and Safety, and 44 Energy Production and Conversion. For specific technology<br />

transfer applications see also the category where the subject is treated.<br />

<strong>2003</strong>0034667 Tokai Univ., Kanagawa, Japan<br />

Development of The Navigation System for The Visually Impaired by Using Optical Beacons<br />

Magatani, Kazushige; Sawa, Koji; Yanashima, Kenji; Oct 2001; 4 pp.; In English<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A4<strong>10</strong>481; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A01, Hardcopy<br />

Our objective of this study is the development of the navigation system which is used in the indoor space(eg. underground<br />

shopping mall, hospital, etc.) and supports activities of the visually impaired without help of others. This system is composed<br />

of optical beacons which are set on the ceiling and emit the position code as infrared signal, an optical receiver which receives<br />

signal from beacons, and a navigator which guides a user by artificial voice. Three subjects with low vision were tested in the<br />

hospital with our navigation system. 49 optical beacons were set on the ceiling, and the subject equipped with an optical<br />

receiver and a navigator. Each subject walked from the start point to the destination following the guidance voice. From these<br />

experiment, the following characteristics became clear. 1) On a pathway where a subject can fell the wall, every subjects could<br />

follow the navigation voice. 2) Some subjects couldn’t go across the wide pathway straight, and then the system lost their<br />

223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!