Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003
Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003
Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003
- TAGS
- volume
- 202.118.250.135
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>2003</strong>0038797 Lawrence Livermore National Lab., Livermore, CA<br />
Whither Deterrence. A Brief Synopsis<br />
Poppe, C.; Vergino, E.; Barker, B.; Brown, P.; Gilmartin, T. J.; <strong>May</strong> 29, 2002; 20 pp.<br />
Report No.(s): DE2002-15002153; UCRL-ID-148557; No Copyright; Avail: Department of Energy Information Bridge<br />
To most audiences, deterrence has been interconnected with nuclear weapons whose purpose had been to deter a Soviet<br />
attack. But, the Soviet Union has been gone for almost a decade. President George W. Bush has stated that Russia is not an<br />
enemy of the USA and the numbers of nuclear weapons can be dramatically reduced. It is important to note that deterrence<br />
has always transcended nuclear weapons. The USA first line of deterrence has been its formidable conventional warfare<br />
capability, designed to prevent conflict and win wars if necessary. The role of nuclear weapons has been to deter the use of<br />
nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction against U.S. interests during the conduct of conventional warfare and<br />
to ensure our ability to inflict massive destruction on any who would use nuclear weapons, or other weapons of mass<br />
destruction, against us. With regard to the Soviet Union, the threat of the use of nuclear weapons was a critical component<br />
of our deterrent to prevent massive Soviet conventional attack against our allies in Europe.<br />
NTIS<br />
Nuclear Weapons; Military Operations; Strategy<br />
<strong>2003</strong>0038803 Lawrence Livermore National Lab., Livermore, CA<br />
WSSX-A Joint U.S.-Russian Nuclear Counter-Terrorism Exchange<br />
Crites, T. R.; Sep. 25, 2002; 12 pp.<br />
Report No.(s): DE2002-15002158; UCRL-JC-149057; No Copyright; Avail: Department of Energy Information Bridge<br />
In 1994, the U. S. and Russian Federation governments formally agreed to exchange information on the safety and<br />
security of nuclear weapons. This agreement included three major elements, called Technical Working Groups (TWGs). TWG<br />
C deals with counter-terrorism. Its four assigned actions and U.S./Russian experience are reviewed in this paper. Although<br />
active exchange programs were created under TWGs A and B, involving workshops and laboratory-to-laboratory development<br />
projects, little work was initiated in TWG C, due to the sensitive nature of this information. After 9/11, however, it became<br />
clear that much could be gained by having each country share information to help solve the problem of nuclear proliferation<br />
among terrorist groups. Government-to-government meetings have reaffirmed the initial agreement to exchange information<br />
on this topic, and a number of joint project proposals are now under discussion. The Joint Steering Committee that oversees<br />
this exchange has approved approximately 20 projects. They include such topics as terrorist threat scenario development,<br />
detection of nuclear material and explosives in transportation containers, analysis of material mass and configuration, and<br />
consequence mitigation. It is expected that the joint development of these capabilities will enhance our ability to respond to<br />
a nuclear threat and to facilitate mutual assistance, should either party experience a nuclear terrorist event.<br />
NTIS<br />
United States; Russian Federation; International Cooperation; Terrorism; Nuclear Weapons<br />
85<br />
TECHNOLOGY UTILIZATION AND SURFACE TRANSPORTATION<br />
Includes aerospace technology transfer; urban technology; surface and mass transportation. For related information see also 03 Air<br />
Transportation and Safety, <strong>16</strong> Space Transportation and Safety, and 44 Energy Production and Conversion. For specific technology<br />
transfer applications see also the category where the subject is treated.<br />
<strong>2003</strong>0034667 Tokai Univ., Kanagawa, Japan<br />
Development of The Navigation System for The Visually Impaired by Using Optical Beacons<br />
Magatani, Kazushige; Sawa, Koji; Yanashima, Kenji; Oct 2001; 4 pp.; In English<br />
Report No.(s): AD-A4<strong>10</strong>481; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A01, Hardcopy<br />
Our objective of this study is the development of the navigation system which is used in the indoor space(eg. underground<br />
shopping mall, hospital, etc.) and supports activities of the visually impaired without help of others. This system is composed<br />
of optical beacons which are set on the ceiling and emit the position code as infrared signal, an optical receiver which receives<br />
signal from beacons, and a navigator which guides a user by artificial voice. Three subjects with low vision were tested in the<br />
hospital with our navigation system. 49 optical beacons were set on the ceiling, and the subject equipped with an optical<br />
receiver and a navigator. Each subject walked from the start point to the destination following the guidance voice. From these<br />
experiment, the following characteristics became clear. 1) On a pathway where a subject can fell the wall, every subjects could<br />
follow the navigation voice. 2) Some subjects couldn’t go across the wide pathway straight, and then the system lost their<br />
223