07.02.2013 Views

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

Issue 10 Volume 41 May 16, 2003

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26<br />

METALS AND METALLIC MATERIALS<br />

Includes physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of metals and metallic materials; and metallurgy.<br />

<strong>2003</strong>0032265 Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA, USA<br />

3D Finite Element Analysis of Particle-Reinforced Aluminum<br />

Shen, H.; Lissenden, C. J.; February 01, 2002; 6 pp.; In English; Original contains black and white illustrations<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): NCC3-848; RTOP 706-85-24<br />

Report No.(s): E-13677; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />

Deformation in particle-reinforced aluminum has been simulated using three distinct types of finite element model: a<br />

three-dimensional repeating unit cell, a three-dimensional multi-particle model, and two-dimensional multi-particle models.<br />

The repeating unit cell model represents a fictitious periodic cubic array of particles. The 3D multi-particle (3D-MP) model<br />

represents randomly placed and oriented particles. The 2D generalized plane strain multi-particle models were obtained from<br />

planar sections through the 3D-MP model. These models were used to study the tensile macroscopic stress-strain response and<br />

the associated stress and strain distributions in an elastoplastic matrix. The results indicate that the 2D model having a particle<br />

area fraction equal to the particle representative volume fraction of the 3D models predicted the same macroscopic stress-strain<br />

response as the 3D models. However, there are fluctuations in the particle area fraction in a representative volume element.<br />

As expected, predictions from 2D models having different particle area fractions do not agree with predictions from 3D<br />

models. More importantly, it was found that the microscopic stress and strain distributions from the 2D models do not agree<br />

with those from the 3D-MP model. Specifically, the plastic strain distribution predicted by the 2D model is banded along lines<br />

inclined at 45 deg from the loading axis while the 3D model prediction is not. Additionally, the triaxial stress and maximum<br />

principal stress distributions predicted by 2D and 3D models do not agree. Thus, it appears necessary to use a multi-particle<br />

3D model to accurately predict material responses that depend on local effects, such as strain-to-failure, fracture toughness,<br />

and fatigue life.<br />

Author<br />

Aluminum Alloys; Finite Element Method; Strain Distribution; Triaxial Stresses; Stress-Strain Relationships; Tensile Stress;<br />

Computerized Simulation; Elastic Deformation<br />

<strong>2003</strong>0032927 NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, USA<br />

Specific Hardening Function Definition and Characterization of a Multimechanism Generalized Potential-Based<br />

Viscoelastoplasticity Model<br />

Arnold, S. M.; Saleeb, A. F.; February <strong>2003</strong>; 38 pp.; In English; Original contains black and white illustrations<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): NCC3-808; 22-713-82-35<br />

Report No.(s): NASA/TM-<strong>2003</strong>-212219; NAS 1.15:212219; E-13833; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Given the previous complete-potential structure framework together with the notion of strain- and stress-partitioning in<br />

terms of separate contributions of several submechanisms (viscoelastic and viscoplastic) to the thermodynamic functions<br />

(stored energy and dissipation) a detailed viscoelastoplastic multimechanism characterization of a specific hardening<br />

functional form of the model is presented and discussed. TIMETAL 21S is the material of choice as a comprehensive test<br />

matrix, including creep, relaxation, constant strain-rate tension tests, etc. are available at various temperatures. Discussion of<br />

these correlations tests, together with comparisons to several other experimental results, are given to assess the performance<br />

and predictive capabilities of the present model particularly with regard to the notion of hardening saturation as well as the<br />

interaction of multiplicity of dissipative (reversible/irreversible) mechanisms.<br />

Author<br />

Elastoplasticity; Viscoelasticity; Viscoplasticity; Hardening (Materials); Models; Thermodynamics; Titanium Alloys<br />

<strong>2003</strong>0033070 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA<br />

The FERRUM Project: Experimental Transition Probabilities of [Fe II] and Astrophysical Applications<br />

Hartman, H.; Derkatch, A.; Donnelly, M. P.; Gull, T.; Hibbert, A.; Johannsson, S.; Lundberg, H.; Mannervik, S.; Norlin, L.<br />

-O.; Rostohar, D.; November <strong>16</strong>, 2002; 8 pp.; In English<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): GR/L20276; HST-7302; Copyright; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />

We report on experimental transition probabilities for thirteen forbidden [Fe II] lines originating from three different<br />

metastable Fe II levels. Radiative lifetimes have been measured of two metastable states by applying a laser probing technique<br />

on a stored ion beam. Branching ratios for the radiative decay channels, i.e. M1 and E2 transitions, are derived from observed<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!