12.07.2015 Views

La aquiescencia en los arbitrajes de la Corte ... - lima arbitration

La aquiescencia en los arbitrajes de la Corte ... - lima arbitration

La aquiescencia en los arbitrajes de la Corte ... - lima arbitration

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>La</strong> Aquiesc<strong>en</strong>cia <strong>en</strong> <strong>los</strong> <strong>arbitrajes</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>la</strong> <strong>Corte</strong> Internacional <strong>de</strong> Justicia<strong>de</strong> RREE <strong>de</strong> Nicaragua a su homólogo hondureño <strong>en</strong> <strong>la</strong> que por primera vez seevoca <strong>la</strong> invali<strong>de</strong>z <strong>de</strong> <strong>la</strong> s<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>cia 48 .<strong>La</strong> <strong>Corte</strong> <strong>de</strong>c<strong>la</strong>ró:Nicaragua’s failure to raise any question with regard to the validity of theAward for several years after the full terms of the Award had become knownto it further confirms the conclusion at which the Court has arrived. Theattitu<strong>de</strong> of the Nicaraguan authorities during that period was in conformitywith Article VI1 of the Gamez-Bonil<strong>la</strong> Treaty which provi<strong>de</strong>d that the arbitral<strong>de</strong>cision whatever it might be-and this, in the view of theCourt, inclu<strong>de</strong>sthe <strong>de</strong>cision of the King of Spain as arbitrator “shall be held as a perfect,binding and perpetual Treaty betwe<strong>en</strong> the High Contracting Parties, andshall not be subject to appeal” 49 .El caso <strong>de</strong>l Golfo <strong>de</strong> Maine no pres<strong>en</strong>ta tampoco mayores dificulta<strong>de</strong>s <strong>en</strong>cuanto a <strong>la</strong> <strong>de</strong>terminación <strong>de</strong> <strong>la</strong> fecha <strong>de</strong> inicio <strong>de</strong>l periodo a t<strong>en</strong>er <strong>en</strong> cu<strong>en</strong>ta.Este empieza mediante comunicaciones oficiales <strong>en</strong>tab<strong>la</strong>das <strong>en</strong> 1966 <strong>en</strong>tre elDepartam<strong>en</strong>to <strong>de</strong> Asuntos Exteriores <strong>de</strong>l Canadá y <strong>la</strong> Embajada americana <strong>en</strong>ese país 50 y concluye <strong>en</strong> 1968 cuando el Estado americano sugiere, por medio<strong>de</strong> canales diplomáticos, abrir conversaciones al respecto. Sin embargo, <strong>la</strong><strong>Corte</strong> consi<strong>de</strong>ra igualm<strong>en</strong>te <strong>la</strong> fecha <strong>de</strong> noviembre <strong>de</strong> 1969 <strong>en</strong> <strong>la</strong> que <strong>los</strong> EEUU<strong>de</strong>cidieron no reconocer ningún permiso <strong>de</strong> explotación librado por Canadá <strong>en</strong>el área <strong>en</strong> cuestión.In waiting until 10 May 1968 before suggesting, through diplomatic channels,the op<strong>en</strong>ing of discussions, while the question remained p<strong>en</strong>ding, andth<strong>en</strong> waiting a further year and a half, until November 1969, before statingclearly that no Canadian permit for the exploration or exploitation of th<strong>en</strong>atural resources of the Georges Bank contin<strong>en</strong>tal shelf would be recognized,the United States cannot be regar<strong>de</strong>d as having <strong>en</strong><strong>de</strong>avoured to keepCanada suffici<strong>en</strong>tly informed of its policy 51 .<strong>La</strong> <strong>Corte</strong> dictaminóque:… while it may be conce<strong>de</strong>d that the United States showed a certain imprud<strong>en</strong>cein maintaining sil<strong>en</strong>ce after Canada had issued the first permits48 Ib 213.49 Ib. p 213 -214.50 I.C.J. Reports 1959, p. 308.51 Id.262 Lima Arbitration N° 5 - 2012/2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!