Suomen osallistumisen arviointi - Tekes

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6 Johtopäätökset ja suositukset.............................................................................................................566.1 IEA-yhteistyö on hyödyllistä............................................................................................................566.2 Tuloksellisuus edellyttää valintoja................................................................................................566.3 Sopimuskohtaisen arvioinnin kriteerit......................................................................................58Liitteet1 Kirjallisuusviitteet ja linkit..................................................................................................................592 Lyhenteitä...................................................................................................................................................603 Haastatellut henkilöt............................................................................................................................624 Työpaja.........................................................................................................................................................635 Kysely.............................................................................................................................................................64Tekesin raportit...........................................................................................................................................................738
SummaryThis is an evaluation report about Finland´s participation in theenergy research activities of the International Energy Agency(IEA).For more than 20 years Finland has taken part in the IEAenergy research and development cooperation, where Tekes(the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation)is acting as the national responsible organisation and as an officialparty in individual implementing agreements. PresentlyFinland has 22 signed active agreements with IEA coveringR&D activities in energy production and use, and their environmentalimpacts. The content of many of the aforementionedimplementing agreements cover the field of renewable energysources and the exchange of information in energy technology.The nature of the work is predominately exchange ofinformation of national projects or international cooperationprojects.The objectives of the evaluation were to analyse the benefits,relevance and added value of the participation, and produceproposals of how to develop the activities and clarify thecriteria of the participation. Special efforts were taken to estimatethe benefits of the activities to the Finnish enterprises.An earlier evaluation was carried out in the year 1997.The evaluation aimed at finding answers to several questions;such as what kind of objectives the participation hashad from the point of view of the enterprises, research andenergy policy, are the chosen agreements still relevant, whatkind of experiences have been gained from the participation,and what are the most important results and impacts especiallyfrom the point of view of the enterprises. For the newimplementing agreements the criteria and procedure for theparticipation should be drawn up, and this evaluation reportgives some guidelines and ideas for selecting new projectswithin the IEA energy research programs.The report describes in detail individual implementingagreements where Finnish research organisations and companiesare active. In this way the report may act as a singleinformation resource covering all activities of the Finnish participationin the IEA.The contents of the evaluation are based on the use ofbackground information (IEA and research agreement webpages) and on interviews from key persons, a web questionnaireand a workshop. The results and findings are partly presentedas citations from interviewed key persons, and themost significant critical aspects are analysed.Because IEA is not a financing organisation the projectsare chosen primarily according to the priorities of the financiersin each country. As a result of this report it was stated thatthere is no system in place to evaluate the needs of projectorganisations during their active period. In addition, a permanentteam working with fixed topics may be more efficientand in depth than the usual work carried out in conferences.Lack of communication between companies and researchinstitutions was regarded as a permanent problem.Proposals to improve the communication were given, e.g.by nominating company representatives as Task Leaders andmembers of Executive Committees in the IEA projects. This isa more common practice in many other countries comparedto Finland.Dissemination of the information is a permanent ongoingchallenge, both to the public and to universities andresearch institutions. The methods of how to disseminate theinformation regarding the opportunities that the IEA-cooperationmay offer to Finland should be reconsidered. A clearneed for improving the national coordination in order to makelong-term planning was reported. Tekes could take a moreactive role in coordinating the work in various programs. Amore active participation of enterprises should be encouragedwhich would result in more practical results and bringgreater opportunities for businesses. Short-term and flexibleprojects could be increased in this respect.9
Page 1: RAPORTTI 4/2013EnergiatutkimustaIEA
Page 4 and 5: Tekes - rahoitusta ja asiantuntemus
Page 6 and 7: SisältöEsipuhe...................
Page 10 and 11: The conclusions and recommendations
Page 12 and 13: 2Kansainvälinen energiajärjestö
Page 14 and 15: Hallintoneuvosto on myös viime kä
Page 16 and 17: Sopimusten piirissä on erilaisia m
Page 18 and 19: Kuva 2. Vastaukset kysymykseen ”K
Page 20 and 21: verran, koska esikilpailullisen yht
Page 22 and 23: Kuva 6. Pk-yrityksiä edustavien va
Page 24 and 25: 4.3 Uudet moottoripolttoaineet (Adv
Page 26 and 27: Kuva 7. Suprajohtava kaapeli.vikavi
Page 28 and 29: 28Taulukko 3. Osallistuminen DSM-oh
Page 30 and 31: sitti CHP-laitoksen sähköhyötysu
Page 32 and 33: Lisäksi sopimukseen kuuluu hallinn
Page 34 and 35: 4.10 Lämpöpumput (Heat PumpingPro
Page 36 and 37: 4.11 Älykkäät sähköverkot Smar
Page 38 and 39: Käsiteltävät alueet:••Tutkim
Page 40 and 41: Task 33. Biomassan terminen kaasutu
Page 42 and 43: Ohjelman painopisteitä ovat maank
Page 44 and 45: ••Markkinatavoite: Vedyn markki
Page 46 and 47: Tavoitteiden saavuttamiseksi tutkit
Page 48 and 49: ••leijukerroksen sintraantumiso
Page 50 and 51: CTI:n toiminnan alueita:••yksit
Page 52 and 53: 4.23 Energiateknologian systeemiana
Page 54 and 55: ”Toiminta painottuu tutkijoiden v
Page 56 and 57: 6Johtopäätökset ja suositukset6.
Page 58 and 59:
••Tarvittavien resurssien (raha
Page 60 and 61:
Liite 2Liite 2. LyhenteitäAFCAMFAM
Page 62 and 63:
Liite 3Liite 3. Haastatellut henkil
Page 64 and 65:
Liite 5Liite 5. Web-kysely1 Web-kys
Page 66 and 67:
Liite 5Kuva 2. Vastausten lukumää
Page 68 and 69:
Liite 54 Vastaukset kvantitatiivise
Page 70 and 71:
Liite 540Kuva 8. Vastaukset kysymyk
Page 72 and 73:
Liite 57 Kyselyn kokonaisarvioViime
Page 74:
Kyllikinportti 2, Länsi-PasilaPL 6
show all

Suomen osallistumisen arviointi - Tekes

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?