THÃS EE - CESBIO - UniversitÃ© Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapitre 3. Article 1The methods are applied on the PRI images after calibration, georeferencing and spatialfiltering to reduce the effect of speckle. The initial number of looks in the georeferenced datais calculated to be L i =1.8, which is consistent with the nominal numbers of looks given forthat product (1 in range, 2 in azimuth). In this area, the fields are relatively large withF≈200m, and the pixel size is R=12.5m. This allows a 7x7 window to be used in the low-passbox filter. The resulting number of looks is L e =34.3, which is in agreement with (25)indicating that 22.0
Chapitre 3. Article 1of the acquisitions. The calculated value of ∆r TC is therefore not necessarily representative ofthe ∆r 90% parameter, and the assessment of ∆r TC,opt may be incorrect.Based on the results obtained in the PR method, the model can be effectively used to assessthe effects of channel gain imbalance or radiometric stability.B. Sensitivity to ambiguity ratioThe ambiguity is simulated by degrading the SLC images according to the relationship givenin (21), for each polarization and each date, and for five ambiguity ratio values: -5dB, -10dB,-17dB, -20dB and -25dB. The -5dB and -10dB values are not realistic but are neverthelesssimulated to test the sensitivity of the model. Contrarily to the analysis in IV.A. where thesource of the ambiguity is set at a constant backscatter value of 0dB to simulate the worstpossible case, a real scene is selected here from another subset of the image. This is thereforeexpected to produce lower additional errors than the theoretical study.After simulating the ambiguity in the complex amplitude images in slant-range geometry, thebackscattering coefficient is computed, a 3x15 low-pass box-filter is applied to reduce thespeckle while taking into account the different pixel spacing in range and azimuth, and theimages are georeferenced to the GIS geometry using tie-points. The number of looks of thegeoreferenced images is calculated to be L=19.Figure 15 represents the variations of the ∆r parameter and of the additional error due toambiguity as a function of the ambiguity ratio, calculated for the five experimental values andsimulated by the error model for the PR method. The error model is run with p(B)=0.75,L=19, ∆r=6.57dB, and I 1,B =-6dB, which is calculated from the HH and VV images.∆r (dB)8765432Effect of ambiguity on ∆rTheoretical resultsExperimental resultsAdditional error due to ambiguity (%)1098765432Additional error due to ambiguityTheoretical resultsExperimental results10-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5Ambiguity ratio (dB)10-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5Ambiguity ratio (dB)Figure 15. Effect of ambiguity ratio on the class separability (left) and additional error due toambiguity (right) for the polarization ratio method96
Page 4 and 5:
AbstractBecause of the importance o
Page 6 and 7:
que Monique, Delphine et Maud à l
Page 8 and 9:
Enfin, dans le cadre d’un troisi
Page 12 and 13:
6.2. Perspectives..................
Page 14 and 15:
Liste des tableauxTableau 1. Liste
Page 16 and 17:
Chapitre 1. Introduction générale
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Chapitre 2. Principes de l’imager
Page 44 and 45:
Chapitre 2. Principes de l’imager
Page 46 and 47: Chapitre 2. Principes de l’imager
Page 62 and 63: Chapitre 3. Modèle d’erreur pour
Page 74 and 75: Chapitre 3. Article 12011, Sentinel
Page 76 and 77: Chapitre 3. Article 1rrB⎛ p(A)⎞
Page 78 and 79: Chapitre 3. Article 1- p(B), the a
Page 80 and 81: Chapitre 3. Article 1imperfections,
Page 82 and 83: Chapitre 3. Article 11.210.80.60.40
Page 84 and 85: Chapitre 3. Article 1and p(B)=0.5 (
Page 86 and 87: Chapitre 3. Article 122∆ 2δShv+
Page 88 and 89: Chapitre 3. Article 1Additional err
Page 90 and 91: Chapitre 3. Article 1As suggested i
Page 92 and 93: Chapitre 3. Article 1Particular val
Page 94 and 95: Chapitre 3. Article 1Table 1 summar
Page 98 and 99: Chapitre 3. Article 1As predicted b
Page 100 and 101: Chapitre 3. Article 1Considering th
Page 102 and 103: Chapitre 4. Cartographie des riziè
Page 110 and 111: Chapitre 4. Article 2109
Page 124 and 125: Chapitre 5. Article 3USE OF ENVISAT
Page 126 and 127: Chapitre 5. Article 3during the rep
Page 128 and 129: Chapitre 5. Article 3which is plant
Page 130 and 131: Chapitre 5. Article 3the whole prov
Page 132 and 133: Chapitre 5. Article 3The 36 VGT-S10
Page 134 and 135: Chapitre 5. Article 3tTCTCTCTCr⎛
Page 136 and 137: Chapitre 5. Article 3Figure 7. Rice
Page 138 and 139: Chapitre 5. Article 3Table 3. Plant
Page 140 and 141: Chapitre 5. Article 3Table 5. Retri
Page 142 and 143: Chapitre 5. Article 3Tien GiangMTC
Page 144 and 145: Chapitre 5. Article 3Le Toan, T., R
Page 146 and 147:
Chapitre 6. Conclusion généraleLa
Page 148 and 149:
Chapitre 6. Conclusion généraleco
Page 150 and 151:
Annexe A. Rapport final du projet
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Annexe B. Présentation du projet
Page 158 and 159:
Annexe B. Présentation du projet
Page 160 and 161:
Annexe C. Article 4Annexe C159
Page 162 and 163:
Annexe C. Article 4161
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Annexe D. Article 5Annexe D175
Page 178 and 179:
Annexe D. Article 5177
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Bibliographie[1] United Nations Dep
Page 186 and 187:
[29] Lee J.-S., Grunes M.R., Pottie
show all

THÃS EE - CESBIO - UniversitÃ© Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

THÃS EE - CESBIO - UniversitÃ© Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier