Sieog 2-2008

4. Petrou S.The economic consequences of preterm birth during
the first 10 years of life. BJOG 2005; 112 (Suppl. 1): 10-15.
5. Romero R e coll.The preterm labor syndrome. Ann. NY Acad.
Sci. 1994; 734: 414-429.
6. Romero R e coll.The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG 2007;
113 (Suppl. 3): 17-42.
7. Tiret L. Gene-environment interaction: a central concept in multifactorial
diseases. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2002; 61: 457-463.
8. Adams K e coll.The genetic contribution towards preterm delivery.
Semin. Fetal Neonatal. Med. 2004; 9: 445-452.
9. Goldenberg R e coll.The preterm prediction study: the value of
new vs standard risk factors in predicting early and all spontaneous
preterm births. Am. Public Health. 1998; 88: 233-238.
10. Nicolaides K. Some thoughts on the true value of ultrasound. Ultrsound
Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 30: 671-674.
11. Horsch S e coll. Brain abnormalities in extremely low gestational
age infants: a Swedish population based MRI study. Acta Paediatrica
2007; 96: 979-984.
12. Iams J e coll.The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous
premature delivery. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996; 334: 567-572.
13. Buekens P e coll. European Community Collaborative Study
Group on prenatal screening. Randomized controlled trial of routine
cervical examinations in pregnancy. Lancet 1994; 344: 841-844.
14. Heath V e coll. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction
of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.
1998; 12: 312-317.
15. Hassan S e coll. Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length
< or =15 mm have nearly a 50% risk of early spontaneous preterm
delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000; 182: 1458-1467.
16. Taipale P e coll. Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix at
18-22 weeks’ gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Obstet. Gynecol.
1998; 92: 902-907.
17. To M e coll. Prediction of patient-specific risk of early preterm
delivery using maternal history and sonographic measurement of cervical
length: a population-based prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet.
Gynecol. 2006; 27: 362-367.
18. Guzman E e coll. Longitudinal assessment of endocervical canal
length between 15 and 24 weeks’ gestation in women at risk for pregnancy
loss or preterm birth. Obstet. Gynecol. 1998; 92: 31-37.
19. Berghella V e coll. Prediction of preterm delivery with transvaginal
ultrasonography of the cervix in patients with high-risk pregnancies:
does cerclage prevent prematurity? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999;
181: 809-815.
20. Guzman E e coll.A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters
in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations.
Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2001; 18: 204-210.
21. Airoldi J e coll.Transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix to predict
preterm birth in women with uterine anomalies. Obstet. Gynecol.
2005; 106: 553-536.
22. Owen J e coll. Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women
at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. JAMA 2001; 286: 1340-
1348.
23. Celik E e coll. Cervical length and obstetric history predict spontaneous
preterm birth: development and validation of a model to pro-
VII
vide individualized risk assessment. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2008;
31: 549-554.
24. Tongsong T e coll. Single transvaginal sonographic measurement
of cervical length early in the third trimester as a predictor of preterm
delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 1995; 86: 184-187.
25. Berghella V e coll. Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual
examination as a predictor of preterm delivery. Am. J. Obstet.
Gynecol. 1997; 177: 723-730.
26. Tsoi E e coll. Sonographic measurement of cervical length in
threatened preterm labor in singleton pregnancies with intact membranes.
Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 25: 353-356.
27. Crane J e coll.Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical
length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased
risk: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2008;
31: 579-587.
28. Mesiano S. Myometrial progesterone responsiveness and the control
of human parturition. J. Soc. Gynecol. Investig. 2004; 11: 193-202.
29. O’Brien J e coll. Progesterone vaginal gel for the reduction of recurrent
preterm birth: primary results from a randomized, doubleblind,
placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 30:
687-696.
30. Fonseca E e coll. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth
among women with a short cervix. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007; 357: 462-
469.
31. De Franco EA e coll.Vaginal progesterone is associated with a
decrease in risk for early preterm birth and improved neonatal outcome
in women with a short cervix: a secondary analysis from a randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet.
Gynecol. 2007; 30: 697-705.
32. Espinoza J e coll.The prevalence and clinical significance of amniotic
fluid ‘sludge’ in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes.
Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 25: 346-352.
33. Bujold E e coll. Intra-amniotic sludge, short cervix, and risk of preterm
delivery. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2006; 28: 198-202.
34. Romero R e coll.What is amniotic fluid ‘sludge’? Ultrasound Obstet.
Gynecol. 2007; 30: 793-798.
35. Kusanovic J e coll. Clinical significance of the presence of amniotic
fluid ‘sludge’ in asymptomatic patients at high risk for spontaneous
preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 30: 706-714.
36. Gomez R e coll. Cervicovaginal fibronectin improves the prediction
of preterm delivery based on sonographic cervical length in patients
with preterm uterine contractions and intact membranes.Am.
Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 192: 350-359.
37. Smith V e coll.A systematic review and quality assessment of systematic
reviews of fetal fibronectin and transvaginal length for predicting
preterm birth. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2007; 133:
134-142.
38. Paternoster D e coll. Cervical phIGFBP-1 in the evaluation of the
risk of preterm delivery. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2007; 86: 151-
155.
39. Ting H e coll. Comparison of Bedside Test Kits for Prediction of
Preterm Delivery: Phosphorylated Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding
Protein-1 (pIGFBP-1) Test and Fetal Fibronectin Test. Ann. Acad.
Med. Singapore 2007; 36: 399-402.