01.03.2024 Aufrufe

HANSA 03-2024

HullPIC 24 · Offshore-Wasserstoff · Forschungsschiffe · Royal Bodewes Shipyard · St. Lawrence & Great Lakes · Schiffbau und Häfen in Nordamerika · Flag State Performance · Schifffahrts-Essen 2024

HullPIC 24 · Offshore-Wasserstoff · Forschungsschiffe · Royal Bodewes Shipyard · St. Lawrence & Great Lakes · Schiffbau und Häfen in Nordamerika · Flag State Performance · Schifffahrts-Essen 2024

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

SCHIFFSTECHNIK | SHIP TECHNOLOGY<br />

based on full-scale data. This application is in line with the initial<br />

vision of ISO 19<strong>03</strong>0, as it focusses on »classic« eneryg saving devices,<br />

like wake-equalizing ducts.<br />

Mads Martinsen (Mærsk Mc-Kinney Møller Center for Zero Carbon<br />

Shipping) look from a ship operator’s side on Performance of<br />

energy efficiency technologies retrofitted on containerships. Other<br />

presentations look at energy saving retrofits which used to be considered<br />

to be exotic, but are increasingly considered in view of the<br />

CII crunch. Ruth (DNV) look at Long-term verification of ALS and<br />

WASP systems. ALS stands for air-lubrication systems, WASP for<br />

wind assisted ship propulsion. Both options have enjoyed exponential<br />

growth in shipping over the past 5 years, and are expected to see<br />

continued exponential take-up in shipping.<br />

Especially for WASP systems, the business case is often difficult<br />

to establish due to high uncertainties, as energy savings depends<br />

highly nonlinearly on ship speed and operational area. Masutani<br />

(Sumitomo) elaborates on this in Navigating a sustainable future<br />

with wind-assisted ship technology: NAPA, Norsepower, and<br />

Sumitomo‘s collaborative journey. The business case is there,<br />

often, but sophisticated performance monitoring is the best approach<br />

to quantify it.<br />

Artificial intelligence<br />

»Ebony and ivory, living in perfect harmony« came to my mind<br />

looking at the papers of this year’s HullPIC. Not thinking about a<br />

piano keyboard, but how the discussion on black-box models<br />

based on Artificial Intelligence and white-box models based on<br />

first-principles CFD simulations has evolved since 2016.<br />

There had been controversy around Artificial Intelligence in<br />

performance monitoring already during the development of<br />

ISO 19<strong>03</strong>0. The standard accepted CFD simulation as a standard<br />

approach to establishing baselines, i.e., the speed-power<br />

curves defining the ship’s calm-water performance for various<br />

drafts. Methods based on machine learning from data collected<br />

on ships, on the other hand, were relegated to Part 3 of<br />

the standard, deemed to be not mature enough or not enough<br />

independent experience was available to judge accuracy and<br />

reliability. Both first-principles and machine learning approaches<br />

continue to be developed, but a notable trend is the<br />

combination of the two, exploiting the respective strong points<br />

of both approaches.<br />

CFD is very valuable for insight into flows, and we continue<br />

to gain insight into CFD through dedicated validation data, ultimately<br />

increasing accuracy and reliability of CFD approaches<br />

which continue to become increasingly accessible, also in<br />

terms of cost. Most CFD validation has been against model<br />

tests, for good reasons. Model tests allow controlled ambient<br />

conditions and detailed measurements of flow details are easier.<br />

Alas, ship hydrodynamicists are well aware of the scale effects,<br />

making the flow around the full-scale real ship quite different<br />

from model-scale flows. While results for model tests are<br />

quite close together, extrapolations to full scale show much<br />

larger scatter.<br />

Dmitriy Ponkratov (JoRes) presents What did we learn from<br />

the ship scale blind CFD validation exercise? There is indeed<br />

much to learn, both because the JoRes team openly shares the test<br />

case data and results, allowing other CFD groups to test their approaches.<br />

»Blind« tests are particularly insightful, as the simulators<br />

do not know the experimental results ahead of their computations.<br />

Thus, there is no chance to tweak parameters until<br />

good agreement with experiments is achieved.<br />

Deep dive into trim optimisation<br />

Inno Gatin (Cloud Towing Tank) takes a Deep dive into trim optimisation:<br />

Physical phenomena behind the fuel savings. Trim optimization<br />

shares the need for baseline curves with performance<br />

monitoring. Parallel computation in numerical towing tanks,<br />

using the cloud for computing power, has brought down costs for<br />

such systematic computations considerably. The computations<br />

are often used as a standard building block in state-of-the-art per-<br />

Dein Partner für<br />

Bunker-Service<br />

Betriebs- und Schmierstoffe für den<br />

sicheren Betrieb Deiner Flotte.<br />

Infos unter:<br />

Tel. +49 40 53798470<br />

hoyer-marine.de<br />

<strong>HANSA</strong> – International Maritime Journal <strong>03</strong> | <strong>2024</strong><br />

45

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!