23.02.2013 Views

Plant basal resistance - Universiteit Utrecht

Plant basal resistance - Universiteit Utrecht

Plant basal resistance - Universiteit Utrecht

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SCOPE<br />

109<br />

General discussion<br />

For a successful parasitic interaction, pathogens and insects have to cope with a plethora<br />

of plant defence mechanisms. Some of these defences are pre-existing, while others are<br />

inducible by the attacking organism. As was outlined in the General Introduction of this thesis<br />

(Figure 1; Chapter 1), induced defence in plants is based on sequentially activated defence<br />

layers that are active at different stages of the parasitic interaction. In general terms, these<br />

layers of the plant immune system can be separated between pre-invasive defence barriers,<br />

such as PAMP-induced closure of stomata (Melotto et al., 2006), early-acting post-invasive<br />

defence, such as localised deposition of ROS and callose (Luna et al., 2011), and late-acting<br />

post-invasive defences that are under control by de novo produced defence hormones, such<br />

as salicylic acid (SA; Heil and Ton, 2008). The overarching objective of the work presented in<br />

this thesis was to study the contribution of post-invasive defence barriers to <strong>basal</strong> <strong>resistance</strong><br />

(Chapters 2 and 3) and their impact on the interactions with plant-beneficial microbes, such<br />

as rhizosphere-colonizing Pseudomonas putida bacteria (Chapter 4).<br />

NATURAL OCCURRING VARIATION IN BASAL RESISTANCE<br />

The vast majority of studies on natural variation in plant defence have focussed on ETI (De<br />

Meaux and Mitchell-Olds, 2003; Holub, 2007; Van Poecke et al., 2007), which is likely due to<br />

the robustness and reproducibility of the ETI phenotype. There are also numerous studies<br />

about natural variation in <strong>basal</strong> <strong>resistance</strong> against pathogens and herbivores, many of which<br />

are based on the genetic model plant species Arabidopsis (Koornneef et al., 2004). However,<br />

relatively few of these have linked this variation to actual <strong>resistance</strong> mechanisms. The natural<br />

variation in <strong>basal</strong> <strong>resistance</strong> of Arabidopsis to insects often originates from differences<br />

in pre-existing pools of glucosinolates (Kliebenstein et al., 2001; Koornneef et al., 2004).<br />

Glucosinolates enable a rapid production of biocidal isothiocyanates after herbivore attack<br />

and could therefore, be viewed as a constitutively primed defence mechanism. Natural<br />

variation in <strong>basal</strong> <strong>resistance</strong> of Arabidopsis against pathogens, on the other hand, seems to<br />

stem from more diverse mechanisms than from glucosinolates. For instance, Denby et al.,<br />

(2004) reported that natural variation in <strong>basal</strong> <strong>resistance</strong> against the necrotroph Botrytis<br />

cinerea correlates with responsiveness of pathogen- and acifluorfen-induced camalexin, an<br />

indole-derived phytoalexin. Further genetic dissection of this <strong>basal</strong> <strong>resistance</strong> in a mapping<br />

population of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) revealed multiple small-to-medium-effect<br />

quantitative trait loci (QTLs), but it remained unclear to what extent these loci influence<br />

the responsiveness of camalexin induction itself. Similarly, Llorente et al. (2005) used a RIL<br />

population to dissect natural variation in <strong>basal</strong> <strong>resistance</strong> against the necrotrophic fungus<br />

Plectosphaerella cucumerina, which identified three different QTLs. The most influential

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!